Institute for the Study of War

54.6K posts

Institute for the Study of War banner
Institute for the Study of War

Institute for the Study of War

@TheStudyofWar

ISW is a policy research organization focused on U.S. national security. Email: [email protected]. https://t.co/FO1PVyOnYB

Washington D.C. Katılım Eylül 2009
3.3K Takip Edilen1.1M Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Institute for the Study of War
NEW: Iran’s counterproposal to the United States reportedly includes a three-phase plan that seeks to quickly end the war, guarantee no future combined force strikes on Iran, and address the Strait of Hormuz in the first phase, while delaying talks on Iran’s nuclear program to a second phase. Full update⬇️ Iran appears to be offering the possibility of discussing nuclear issues at a later date in order to push the United States to end the war and lift its naval blockade. The United States has reportedly responded to Iran’s counterproposal, according to Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
English
7
29
134
61.8K
Institute for the Study of War
MORE: Ukrainian forces have been steadily increasing the range, volume, and intensity of their long-range strike campaigns against Russian oil infrastructure and military assets in Russia and occupied Ukraine’s territories since mid-March 2026, heavily targeting port and oil infrastructure in Leningrad Oblast and Krasnodar Krai. Ukrainian forces are using Ukraine’s intensified domestic air and naval drone production to intensify strikes against Russia. Ukrainian forces are exploiting the large attack surface of Russia’s deep rear and the wide footprint of Russian oil infrastructure and military assets. Continued Ukrainian drone strikes are degrading Russia’s ability to store and transport oil and are impacting Russian oil export revenues, which may partially offset the elevated Russian revenues from global spikes in oil prices.
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
Institute for the Study of War@TheStudyofWar

NEW: Ukrainian forces continue their long-range strike campaign against Russian military assets and oil infrastructure, exploiting vulnerabilities in Russian air defenses. Other Key Takeaways ⬇️ - Russia’s additional revenues from rising oil prices are likely insufficient to fundamentally change the course of Russia’s growing economic issues. - Senior Russian bankers continue to express worries over economic issues that will continue to mature throughout the 2026 fiscal year, despite increased Russian oil revenues. - Ukrainian forces recently advanced northwest of Orikhiv. - Russian forces launched one Iskander-M ballistic missile and 268 long-range drones against Ukraine overnight.

English
4
42
177
26.7K
Institute for the Study of War
2/ The IRGC Navy likely attacked a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz on May 3, likely to sustain high shipping costs and oil prices to pressure the United States to make concessions. United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) reported that multiple small craft attacked a vessel—likely the Liberian-flagged, Greek-owned Minoan Falcon—11 nautical miles west of Sirik, Hormozgan Province, Iran. The vessel sailed northbound through the Strait of Hormuz before it abruptly turned south, likely due to the attack. UKMTO confirmed that the vessel’s crew members are safe. The IRGC Navy previously attacked and likely redirected two Greek-owned vessels toward Iran on April 22. CTP-ISW assessed on May 2 that some elements of the regime may be willing to endure the United States’ economic and military pressure while simultaneously imposing economic and political costs on the United States to try to pressure the United States to soften its negotiating demands.
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
English
3
16
57
18.2K
Institute for the Study of War
NEW: Ukrainian forces continue their long-range strike campaign against Russian military assets and oil infrastructure, exploiting vulnerabilities in Russian air defenses. Other Key Takeaways ⬇️ - Russia’s additional revenues from rising oil prices are likely insufficient to fundamentally change the course of Russia’s growing economic issues. - Senior Russian bankers continue to express worries over economic issues that will continue to mature throughout the 2026 fiscal year, despite increased Russian oil revenues. - Ukrainian forces recently advanced northwest of Orikhiv. - Russian forces launched one Iskander-M ballistic missile and 268 long-range drones against Ukraine overnight.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
English
8
85
389
58.5K
Institute for the Study of War
NEW: Iran’s counterproposal to the United States reportedly includes a three-phase plan that seeks to quickly end the war, guarantee no future combined force strikes on Iran, and address the Strait of Hormuz in the first phase, while delaying talks on Iran’s nuclear program to a second phase. Full update⬇️ Iran appears to be offering the possibility of discussing nuclear issues at a later date in order to push the United States to end the war and lift its naval blockade. The United States has reportedly responded to Iran’s counterproposal, according to Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Esmail Baghaei.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
English
7
29
134
61.8K
Institute for the Study of War
MORE 🧵(1/3): ISW has observed evidence to assess that Russian forces lost control of 116 square kilometers in April 2026, not counting areas into which Russian troops may have infiltrated. The Russian rate of advance across the battlefield has been steadily declining since November 2025 as continued Ukrainian ground counterattacks, Ukrainian mid-range strikes, the February 2026 block on Russia’s use of Starlink terminals in Ukraine, and the Kremlin’s throttling of Telegram have exacerbated existing problems within the Russian military. The relative decline in the rate of Russian advances may be related in part to annual seasonal patterns. ISW has previously observed relative declines in the rate of Russian advances during March and April due to seasonal weather effects, namely the muddy rasputitsa season, the period in which melting frozen winter ground and spring rains degrade conditions for mechanized movement. Russian forces have previously increased their advances in May and June as the ground dries, and it remains to be seen whether such trends will repeat in 2026.
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
Institute for the Study of War@TheStudyofWar

NEW: Russian forces in April 2026 suffered a net loss of territory controlled in the Ukrainian theater for the first time since Ukraine’s August 2024 incursion into Kursk Oblast. Other Key Takeaways: The relative decline in the rate of Russian advances may be related in part to annual seasonal patterns. The rate of Russian advances has slowed in 2026 compared to 2025, but the changing character of the war, particularly Russia’s increased use of infiltration tactics over the course of 2025, makes year-on-year comparisons difficult. The Kremlin uses Russian infiltration tactics in part to exaggerate Russian control of terrain. ISW has reviewed and refined its mapping data and methodology, identifying and rectifying some data artifacts that did not affect the visible map geometry but did affect some calculations of area. These changes have not affected ISW’s previously assessed trendlines of the Russian rate of advance. Russian milbloggers identified problems with the Russian air campaign and assessed that Russian forces may not be able to take advantage of reported increased bombing capabilities. Russian forces recently advanced near Novopavlivka and in western Zaporizhia Oblast. Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area. Ukrainian forces likely struck a Russian air defense system during their April 30 to May 1 overnight strike against Krasnodar Krai. Russian forces launched 163 drones toward Ukraine overnight.

English
8
118
406
81.9K
Institute for the Study of War retweetledi
Institute for the Study of War
Our latest interactive map "Russia's Cognitive Warfare Infrastructure" is live. Navigate to the links in our thread to view this map, along with its related research report. (1/2)
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
English
15
214
470
69K
Institute for the Study of War
3/ The Kremlin uses Russian infiltration tactics in part to exaggerate Russian control of terrain. ISW has observed evidence to assess that Russian forces seized or infiltrated into a net of 28.28 square kilometers in April 2026 and a total of 1716.42 square kilometers from November 2025 to April 2026. Russian forces seized only 1443.35 square kilometers in the same time period, however. Russian forces have been using infiltration tactics in part to create the perception of continuous Russian advances across the front and to support Kremlin cognitive warfare efforts to exaggerate Russian successes. Russian forces, however, do not control these infiltration areas, which are often collocated among Ukrainian positions in contested “gray zones.” ISW’s mapping methodology for infiltration areas is more generous to Russian forces than ISW’s methodology for mapping Russian advances or controlled terrain, moreover. ISW’s methodology requires a lower evidentiary threshold for expanding the assessed Russian infiltration layer than the evidentiary threshold needed to subsequently recode these Russian infiltration areas as Ukrainian-held. It will often be the case, for example, that Russian forces lost the positions they gained during an initial infiltration mission but that ISW did not observe evidence to support an assessment that Ukrainian forces regained this position. The evidence that a Russian infiltration mission has occurred, such as video of a Ukrainian strike against a small group of Russian infiltrators, can also be evidence that the infiltration failed if all the infiltrators were eliminated. ISW will still code the area as infiltrated in the absence of evidence that Ukrainian forces reoccupied the ground.
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
English
0
14
72
22.8K
Institute for the Study of War
2/ The rate of Russian advances has slowed in 2026 compared to 2025, but the changing character of the war, particularly Russia’s increased use of infiltration tactics over the course of 2025, makes year-on-year comparisons difficult. ISW has observed evidence to assess that Russian forces seized 1,443.35 square kilometers in the past six months (November 2025 to April 2026) compared with 2,368.38 square kilometers seized during the same time period in 2024-2025. Russian forces seized an average of 2.9 square kilometers per day in the first four months of 2026 compared to 9.76 square kilometers per day in the first four months of 2025. Russian forces have been increasingly using infiltration tactics since Fall 2025, however, and ISW created its assessed Russian infiltration layer to depict these infiltration areas as distinct from areas in which Russian forces have advanced and seized territory. Comparisons of Russian gains this year with those of previous years, when infiltration tactics were rarer, are not straightforward, as Russian forces exert a significantly lower degree of control over infiltration areas than they do over seized areas.
Institute for the Study of War tweet media
English
2
18
78
24.8K
Institute for the Study of War
NEW: Russian forces in April 2026 suffered a net loss of territory controlled in the Ukrainian theater for the first time since Ukraine’s August 2024 incursion into Kursk Oblast. Other Key Takeaways: The relative decline in the rate of Russian advances may be related in part to annual seasonal patterns. The rate of Russian advances has slowed in 2026 compared to 2025, but the changing character of the war, particularly Russia’s increased use of infiltration tactics over the course of 2025, makes year-on-year comparisons difficult. The Kremlin uses Russian infiltration tactics in part to exaggerate Russian control of terrain. ISW has reviewed and refined its mapping data and methodology, identifying and rectifying some data artifacts that did not affect the visible map geometry but did affect some calculations of area. These changes have not affected ISW’s previously assessed trendlines of the Russian rate of advance. Russian milbloggers identified problems with the Russian air campaign and assessed that Russian forces may not be able to take advantage of reported increased bombing capabilities. Russian forces recently advanced near Novopavlivka and in western Zaporizhia Oblast. Ukrainian forces recently advanced in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area. Ukrainian forces likely struck a Russian air defense system during their April 30 to May 1 overnight strike against Krasnodar Krai. Russian forces launched 163 drones toward Ukraine overnight.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
English
12
213
802
173.2K
Institute for the Study of War
NEW: Iran does not appear to have altered its negotiating position over the management of the Strait of Hormuz and its nuclear program in its latest proposal. Some elements of the Iranian regime may calculate that Iran can impose sufficient economic and political costs on the United States to coerce the United States to make concessions. Other Key Takeaways: Iran is taking steps to try to withstand the US naval blockade. Iran has reportedly begun reducing its oil production as its storage capacity reaches its limits. Iran is likely reducing oil production rather than halting it because shutting down oil production could cause significant damage to Iranian oil fields. Hezbollah may be domestically producing first-person view (FPV) drones. Hezbollah posted footage on May 2 showing Hezbollah fighters domestically producing drones, but it is unclear if the drones in the video are FPV drones. Hezbollah’s video comes after an Israeli military official told the Associated Press on April 30 that Israel believes that Hezbollah is domestically manufacturing FPV drones.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
English
20
149
473
149.1K
Institute for the Study of War retweetledi
Institute for the Study of War
NEW: Ukrainian forces struck Russian oil infrastructure in Krasnodar and Perm krais and Orenburg Oblast between April 29 and May 1, including a strike against the Tuapse Oil Refinery for the fourth time since April 1. The Ukrainian General Staff confirmed that Ukrainian forces recently struck several Russian aircraft up to 1,676 kilometers from the international border. Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil infrastructure degraded the average output of Russian oil refineries to their lowest level since December 2009. Neither Russian nor Ukrainian forces made confirmed advances on the frontline. Russian forces launched 409 drones toward Ukraine overnight.
Institute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet mediaInstitute for the Study of War tweet media
English
7
167
715
67.9K