Holloway

45.3K posts

Holloway banner
Holloway

Holloway

@TheTalkWatcher

Katılım Ağustos 2011
1.1K Takip Edilen351 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
I have a habit of ending up at the 6 O'clock of spooky license plates. In 2016 I even ended up behind a TRUMP plate. But sadly forgot to take a photo. This has nothing to do with the blog does it? thearea51blog.blogspot.com
Holloway tweet mediaHolloway tweet mediaHolloway tweet media
English
0
0
28
0
Holloway retweetledi
Melodies & Masterpieces
Melodies & Masterpieces@SVG__Collection·
“Machine Gun” by Jimi Hendrix is one of those solos that will still be studied a thousand years from now.
English
99
1.1K
5.2K
225.8K
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
The US ruling class capitalist ideology prevents the US from implementing peaceful policies that require state companies. The macro economy should not be controlled by oligarchs who personally profit from owning it. The energy sector should be publicly owned.
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher

With nuclear energy we could be producing price stable greener & cheaper urea fertilizer. Plus it has the huge upside of not having maintain an empire that sends it's boys to die on foreign shores so US billionaire oligarchs can live like Platonic pigs. This is the peace solution

English
0
1
1
17
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
With nuclear energy we could be producing price stable greener & cheaper urea fertilizer. Plus it has the huge upside of not having maintain an empire that sends it's boys to die on foreign shores so US billionaire oligarchs can live like Platonic pigs. This is the peace solution
Holloway tweet mediaHolloway tweet mediaHolloway tweet media
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher

Without using any petrochemicals the US can meet all of it's urea fertilizer needs with a single nuclear park or with 3 regional distributed hubs. We would be completely independent. No need to send soldiers the Middle East to secure the Strait of Hormuz. This war is immoral on

English
0
0
0
29
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
They control US foreign policy. They have been against nuclear energy from the beginning. Because it would make their petrochemical assets less valuable or even a stranded asset. They decided it was better to kill millions of people rather than go nuclear.
English
0
0
0
6
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
The energy war now being fought in the Persian Gulf is not justified in the classical Platonic sense. We don't need any of the petrochemical resources of the Gulf. We have technology that can replace it. The Energy war shows who is really in control of the USA - the oil boys.
English
1
0
0
6
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
Without using any petrochemicals the US can meet all of it's urea fertilizer needs with a single nuclear park or with 3 regional distributed hubs. We would be completely independent. No need to send soldiers the Middle East to secure the Strait of Hormuz. This war is immoral on
Holloway tweet mediaHolloway tweet media
English
1
0
0
44
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
This is where I part ways with the social media vox populi. A war between China and the USA will include space capabilities. The US keeps it's strategic cards close to the vest. I think a war between China and the USA will start in space. China will be blind in the first moves.
Kevin Castley 🇨🇦@KevinCastley

We don’t talk enough about just how badly the US would get COOKED if it were foolish enough to start a war with China We often hear in the news American politicians demonizing China and threatening a war over Taiwan— an island they don’t even recognize as a state… But if they were to make good on their threats and appease the reddit libcon-zionist Atlantoids who post B2 dam memes and uphold cartoon dogs on blu*sky— they would get so pulvarized it’s not even funny Let’s look at each traditional dimension of a war with China: air, land, and sea. I won’t get into AI and satellite warfare because that’s beyond obvious in favour of China. China leads AI development and was first to shoot down a satellite But in the air, the US has the most favourable matching. The US has more stealth aircraft and could do some damage. But Chinese air to air missiles are superior these days. Pakistan SMOKED India’s Air Force last year armed with Chinese missiles Once China detects the US it’s ejection time for their pilots They will have a challenge staying out of radar detection even with their stealth In sea it’s not close. US ships are technically better, but China has more ships. But more importantly, China has 200x the shipbuilding capacity of the US So once both navies have sustained a large amount of damage, China can rapidly replenish their numbers The US is down and out once they lose their ships. It will take them decades to rebuild their navy On the ground they will be unable to get very far because China has a larger army equipped with drones and goodies to throw at the US And they can’t paratroop troops from stealth fighters or bombers so they won’t be able to get far inland without getting shot down The only things the US can really do is hit their critical infrastructure and manufacturing. But if they go in that direction, China can do the same to the US with their ICBMs. The US doesn’t have a path to victory They don’t even have a path to victory against Iran. It’s beyond goofy for them to claim they could take China The People’s Liberation Army would COOOK the US 🔥

English
0
0
0
11
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
Stewart Copeland son of CIA founding member Miles Copeland Sr. Plays "Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic" | The Police youtu.be/aYr1G5X4d4g?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
0
7
Holloway retweetledi
Megatron
Megatron@Megatron_ron·
NEW: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran FM Araghchi: “No nation in history has stood for nearly a month against the greatest nuclear-armed power on earth and stopped them from achieving a single goal. This is a point of pride for all of humanity.”
English
292
3.3K
16.7K
316.3K
Holloway retweetledi
The Communists
The Communists@CPGBML·
«A communist is by nature an internationalist, but he is also a patriot» –Fidel Castro "A communist is stronger than a capitalist, because a communist cannot be bought for any amount of money. A communist has a conscience, while a capitalist has nothing but money. He doesn't even have a homeland; for him, his homeland is wherever he gets paid more. A communist is by nature an internationalist, but he is also a patriot. He fulfills his international duty in any country, while at the same time bearing communist responsibility towards his own people." –Fidel Castro Source #Cuba #Castro @BeornAndTheShieldmaiden 🚀Boost🚀
The Communists tweet media
English
20
204
871
12.5K
Holloway retweetledi
Ryan Grim
Ryan Grim@ryangrim·
Who runs Cuba is not my business or your business. But if my tax dollars are spent to block a NICU from getting fuel, then that is my problem and it should be yours too. Do you know how expensive it is for us to enforce this blockade? We need that money here, and those babies need the power to stay on. This is Erich, he’s 2 months old, and here’s the doctor explaining how they hand pump his ventilator when the power goes out
English
79
2.7K
8.7K
117.7K
Holloway retweetledi
James Tate
James Tate@JamesTate121·
Iran trolling Trump again.🤣
English
157
2.2K
6.1K
116.5K
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
Prediction - Given the fact people are blaming "Zionists" for the US attack on Iran. If the US loses the war causing a global depression. Racists will blame "the Jews." The result will be an increase in hate crimes against Jews in the immediate post imperial period.
English
0
0
0
35
Holloway retweetledi
LolitA★☭★
LolitA★☭★@LolyCuba·
Tengo intolerancia al fascismo y porquerías afines. Y tú ⁉️
LolitA★☭★ tweet media
Español
561
740
3.1K
35.4K
Holloway retweetledi
ابوخالد الافغاني
مبدع يصنع مجسم لتر!.مب من أعواد الكبريت ويقوم بإشعالها في مشهد إبداعي ورائع للغاية.
العربية
165
1.9K
9.5K
2.5M
Holloway
Holloway@TheTalkWatcher·
@BowesChay He is a delusional ardent Zionist. Iran is going to come out of this war as the undisputed regional hegemon.
English
0
0
1
17
Chay Bowes
Chay Bowes@BowesChay·
Philosopher Sam Harris claimed that regime-change in Iran would be "easy" because the people "want it" How's that worked out Sam?
English
620
395
2.3K
42.3K