Tim

Amor te deixa conseguir ver coisas sobre uma pessoa que ninguém mais vê. É realmente algo especial. E, tenho alguém especial. Obrigado pelo teu amor.

@uwunetes I'm not sure about camera quality, but what about OnePlus?

i am filled with rage

@wholyv C++ for me as well. It's the first language (and one of the only ones I've used, aside from C, Python, a bit of rust and go) and I know the best. It's easy to make stuff with a language with widespread usage and that you know the best.

C++ is probably the only language that has revolutionised the entire civilisation. I consider it even more revolutionary than python for very good reasons. If i could choose only one language for the rest of my life, it would be cpp.

@hood_sanctuary The keyboard reminded me of the Japanese swipe keyboard (I think 9-key or flick?)

@QuantenMac @Emmett31539642 @unixpill @HowieDuhzit @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh I wouldn't interact with this guy. Spouted false information consistently, and blocked me when given concrete evidence against what he was claiming. He simply doesn't know what he's talking about.

@Emmett31539642 @unixpill @HowieDuhzit @josephfounder @TheTimBrick @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh I don’t need super crazy opsec and ephemeral systems for my day to day distribution. If I was doing stuff that required that I would set it up accordingly

The Arch Linux Core Dev Team is asking r/ArchLinux sub-reddit mods to censor people unhappy with Age Verification in Arch. It appears that Arch Linux considers criticism of Age Verification to be a "Code of Conduct" violation. From an r/ArchLinux moderator responding to a censored user: "I got a DM from much higher up the chain asking me to remove it. Whilst I technically don't answer to them, I do respect their wishes. They don't like someone they consider as part of the core dev teams being called out like that. What you did broke the Arch Linux CoC."

@pawdiefur_fury @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk Ahh sorry, what I meant was, if an application requires the date to be a specific value, you can just, input a valid value, nothing will check that it's right. Though you are right, it's not required, can be left null.

@TheTimBrick @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk not even, its completely optional and can be left null

@pawdiefur_fury @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk inputting into the db*

@pawdiefur_fury @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk Exactly. For anything using systemd's new userdb entry, it's as easy as inputting a valid date lol

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh And you know what, in spite of him, I'm creating my own fork of that.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh Lmao the dude blocked me cuz I pointed it out that the repo was still available after he said he "copyrighted" it. Fucking people don't know how shit works, and then get mad when you point it out. For anyone who wants it: github.com/Jeffrey-Sardin…

@pawdiefur_fury @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk Yeah I know, I used age verification in the wrong way here. I was trying to point out that despite what people are saying about Omarchy not having the systemd change, it will because it's just arch (which uses systemd). For clarification to anyone who sees, it's not verification.

@TheTimBrick @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk systemd does NOT have age verification, only a field that can be used to store the users birth date. It does not check age and is not required or even ever asked for.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh Did I even mention mass surveillance my dude?

@TheTimBrick @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh and as i said before, this is NOT mass surveillence, the government uses other methods for that. this to stop kids from doing illegal activities. i AM PUSHING FOR IT AFTER SEEING SOME OF THE SICK SHIT KIDS ARE DOING ON TELEGRAM AND DISCORD and using vpns to hide it.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh Furthermore, as I have already said in a previous reply, we both were talking about two different things. Of course, the owner of the repository dictates what is modified *on his repo*. That jurisdiction ends as soon as the owner of the repository changes, e.g. if it's forked.

@TheTimBrick @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh they why was it locked so that no other dev can remove it? the lock has nothing to do with comments at all. it locks the age field up so that it cannot be removed. the comment lock came after the change was locked you dumbass piece of shit

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh What I sent and what you said have no correlation at all. What I messaged was the open source license, permitting anyone to copy and modify it as they please. This is why things like liberated systemd are allowed to exist, because it is permitted under the license of the original

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh No, it is not removed, still completely available, because that's not how it works.

@TheTimBrick @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh it is now removed. linus removed it himself.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh Is it something you've read? It's something I have :D "You may modify your copy or copies of the Library or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Library, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above"

@TheTimBrick @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh it is under the licenses. something you forgot.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh And, liberated systemd is still up, so whatever you did, did nothing. The power of open source is that you can change it how you want. Check the LICENSE.LGPL2.1 file in the official repo dictating how the project can be used and modified.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh But that doesn't stop me from modifying the copy on my own machine, or hosting it on a private git instance, etc. Also, are you meaning DMCA? (digital millennium copyright act)? If so, the content is not under copyright protection.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh The issue was we were both thinking about different things. I can easily revert the merge by cloning it and reverting. (`git revert -m 1 HASH`). And the maintainers if they chose to can by the same. I was talking about possibility while you were meaning a decision (I believe).

@TheTimBrick @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh you are so damn wrong and 16 people have said it can't be removed. END OF DISCUSSION. YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW REPOS OR PRS AND MERGES WORK.

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh Though, still, there is no "lock" functionality that does this, other than the social constructs of the project. The only official GitHub lock functionality is to lock the conversation in a PR/MR/Conversation, etc, as I've given screenshots for

@Emmett31539642 @dessertcowboy @josephfounder @LundukeJournal @nvk @dhh I think we're talking about two separate things. The merge can be prevented from changing by the mantainers, as they are owners over it. However, it is just as easy to clone it locally and revert the commit, which I have done just that.