Theostasis Veritas

We're proud to announce that "You Don't Know The REAL Ten Commandments" is now live and available for purchase on Amazon, both in eBook and Paperback. Grab your copy today! amazon.com/dp/B0F9VB6ZJM

Biologically speaking, peak fertility for women is 15-21 yrs old. That's when their body and their eggs are the healthiest, both genetically and epigenetically. They will handle pregnancy and labor better, recover quicker, and provide better, healthier offspring to their man.

Same with glasses. In most cases, it's an unnecessary crutch whose overuse stagnates the body's natural ability to work underused muscles and build elasticity to heal itself.

2.5 Billion babies aborted since 1900. 40+% of all babies conceived last year were already murdered in the womb. A normalized, correct understanding of Biblical marriage, polygyny, and patriarchy/gender roles solves at least 70% of this problem worldwide. So yeah, to combat incorrect Christian teachings on sex, we need to focus on both poking holes in their false teachings and offering Biblically correct teachings about sex.

Good meme, and ultimately a good point. Men, don't raise a princess or a queen, raise your daughters humble enough to be a king's wife, consort, or handmaid. The word "queen" is predated by the older "quean" meaning whore, prostitute, or promiscuous woman - probably because men be queuein' up to see them, if you know what I mean😜 - from the old English cwene/cwen, meaning simply woman. And this reveals a hidden truth most people don't want to acknowledge. In the most basic sense, all women, being dependents, whether promiscuously or not, trade sex for resources. For all of history, marriage has been a committed arrangement where men provide women with food, clothing, shelter, resources, etc. in exchange for sex, babies, childcare, and housekeeping. Thus, the fundamental role of women in society, being the physically weaker sex, whose most important job to society is the bearing and nurture of young, vulnerable children, is to provide enough value to a man that he is willing to commit to support her in staying home and having babies. On the front end, this looks like kindness, affection, sexuality, nurture, loyalty, a submissive/team-player attitude, and some simple joy and competence in regards to cooking and/or housekeeping. Once sex/commitment is given in one-flesh bodily union (aka natural marriage), it's as simple as keeping his tummy fed, his balls drained, and his home a place he's happy to keep coming home to every day. This is the scope of responsibility that gives you as a woman the most freedom and most joy in life. Don't try to be a "queen". You're not the special one. Don't worry about everything going on in the world. That's your husband's job. Women are naturally people-oriented. That's your husband first, your children second, other close friends and family third, and other community and neighbors fourth. Everything beyond that with politics and society and all the crazy news and psy-ops and rumors of wars, that's your husband's job to protect you from all that emotional and mental mess. That's his burden to carry.

Society needs bumbling British intellectuals, whose apologetic attitude, not wanting to be arrested for their speech, is reassuring to the system, allowing them to speak truth about many problematic societal trends without much push-back, so long as they don't touch nationalism.

Facts. I find it appalling to admit, but when I got sexually involved with a girl in high school (we were both "virgins", if you can call a man a virgin), I thought the appropriate Christian repentance at the time was to break it off with her and move on, because I viewed her as this Jezebelic temptation to sin and lead me away from God (even though she was Christian) Little did I realize that per the Bible we were already one-flesh married, and the correct prescribed way for me to "make it right" would have been to formalize the relationship between our families and claim her as my rightful wife, and to protect and provide for her the rest of my life. Yes, in one sense, I have nobody to blame but myself, but also at the same time, I can't deny that it was unbiblical Christian prescriptions perpetuated by modern Christianity specifically around sex and sexuality that led directly to my own sin/unrighteousness in this instance.

I wasn't implying that, but it is true to an extent. You can google "Telegony" in animals. It's a classical Greek theory that Google will tell you it's been debunked in humans by modern genetics, but animal breeding experiments explicitly show us otherwise. In order to get purebred animal breeds, the female can't have been previously sexually involved with any other breeds. There were horse experiments specifically where females that were previously unsuccessfully bred with zebras went back to their own breed and the babies came out striped from the female's previous sexual partners, showing the females retained DNA from previous male sexual partners that had inseminated them. But that wasn't the point I was making specifically. Higher body count gives women more mental and emotional health issues and impede pairbonding. Women with a body count 10-20 have a <25% chance of remaining faithful/committed for life. Whereas the chances of a woman with over 20 previous male sexual partners maintaining a lifelong sexually-exclusive relationship with one man after that are statistically zero. The research I'm referencing compared a woman's number of previous male sexual partners with percentage likelihood of remaining married and sexually faithful for the rest of their life. We have no evidence of any woman with more than 20 previous male sexual partners committing faithfully to one man for the rest of her life. Other autopsy research also indicates that a majority percentage of old women who'd never given birth to a male baby retained male Y-chromosomal DNA in their brain, even after four or five decades. While not definitively proven, the evidence when viewed collectively, appears to indicate strongly that women retain DNA from male sexual partners as a means of accommodation and recognition, because it's foreign tissue entering their body. Therefore every additional male partner that puts his semen inside her creates biological confusion within her body that has holistically broad negative effects, such as mental and emotional health issues, and even physical issues that may affect later offspring. And this creates a really good argument from nature for Biblical one-flesh marriage. When a man puts his seed inside a virgin, she retains his DNA so her body can recognize him as her husband. This is why it was the crime of adulteration to sleep with another man's one-flesh wife, thus adulterating her and her one-flesh relationship with her husband, making mixed-flesh with multiple men.

@TheostasisBooks Are you implying a woman with a higher body count gives children more potential problems? That's crazy. Anywhere I can read up on this? Google isn't giving me much

Yeah, but also, virginity counts for negative in your 30s, this is a major reason why the conversation has shifted to body count. If you're a Christian woman who is still a virgin in your 30s, you've spent half or more of your life habitually sexually repressing your natural, God-given procreative impulses. This means a) you probably have a lot of ego and identity attached to it, b) it's going to be very hard (and likely take years of effort) for you to actually relax into those feelings in a marital relationship to have a rewarding sex life, and c) it's likely there's going to be a whole lot of conscious or unconscious trauma associated directly with your husband (as your "defiler") when you finally get married that will almost certainly lead to major marital strife, hostility, neglect and rejection towards him. And this is a major reason why the data shows that female virginity actually ranks third in likelihood of a lasting/successful marriage. According to the Pew research data, women that had one bad other experience or relationship beforehand are the most loyal group to marry. They learned quickly by experience what type of guy to avoid, and they're both more selective and more humble and committed when the right guy comes along and they lock in. Second to that are women who give you their virginity outside of state/legal marriage as a marker of inner commitment. Maybe you're engaged or cohabiting. Maybe you're high school sweethearts. Either way, they're ride-or-die committed from the get-go and sex (the natural act of marrying your bodies together, aka one-flesh bodily union) WAS their marital commitment to you, regardless of whenever you actually decide to have a wedding. Third is women who actually wait 'til their wedding night. A shocking percentage of these marriages will either end up in divorce, or be sexless, lonely, codependent, married in name only, require years of therapy, or with one or both parties having affairs or turning to porn along the way, and the statistical likelihood of such problems tends to only get worse the older the woman is. (Fourth best option is a woman under 25 with a body count of 2-9. Fifth is a woman aged 25-35 with a body count of 2-9, Sixth is any still fertile woman with a body count of 10-20. Worst option is 20+, regardless of age.) If you really want to do the whole "wait til the wedding night" thing, then marry a 19-year-old virgin, because the longer she fixes that sexual repression into her identity, the more neuroses she will develop, and the more strain it will cause a marriage. Biologically, 98% of us have "adolesced" into adulthood (sexual maturity) before our 16th birthday, and that was a normal healthy marriageable age for most women for all of mankind's existence until the last 50-100 years. 99% chance she was a virgin, and because she'd just "come into bloom" so to speak, she was very open and explorative in her sexuality at the time of marriage. Now, average age of first marriage for a woman in the US is 31. Chances are she'll have a double-digit body count before you come along, give you 1-2 kids, one of them will be autistic or have a chronic health condition, and at some point, she'll either cheat, want to open the relationship/swing, and/or destroy your life in divorce court within a decade. But even if you married a 31-year-old, devoutly religious virgin, most of those problems are statistically still likely, the risk is just about 30% less. i.e. You might have 2-3 kids (one of whom will still be autistic or chronically ill) instead of 1-2. Your 50% chance of divorce or adultery is down to a 35% chance. But almost every metric men are looking for in a long-term committed relationship (marriage) goes down with the increased age of the woman beyond 25. Case in point, a 35-year-old woman passes on more genetic degradation and risk to her offspring than having kids with your first cousin while she's in her 20s. If you're in your 50s or 60s, a 35-year-old woman who can still give you 3 kids may be awesome. But 35-45 is a healthy and successful man's prime, whereas a 35-year-old woman is already significantly down-the-hill at this point. A woman's prime (under current laws) is 18-25 (biologically, it's 15-25, but that's a discussion for another time). But this is precisely why just 200 years ago in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice (that is still taking the world by storm), the Bennett sisters are 15-22 years old, whereas Darcy, Wickham, and Bingley are all 35-40 years old. This is marriageable prime for both genders. The man is established in himself and his career, the woman is young enough to still be in her fertile peak. A woman who is already well on her way down the fertility hill and is still a virgin has essentially squandered her most fertile years, and that's a fundamentally undesirable trait. Sure, it's not as bad as a woman who wasted those years with hyper promiscuity and abortion, and it might be admirable in some respects, especially platonically, but it's not desirable in a wife.

Society, and especially women, need to understand that their fertile prime is 15-25 years old and whereas it's 30-45 for men. Women, especially Christian women, should be encouraged to prioritize marriage and children during those ages, especially to established men in their 30s. This promotes basically everything men are wanting in wives: Young, fertile, healthy, virgin/low body count, more submissive, respectful, open-minded, positive, etc. If women still want college or a career, they could have as many as 7 or even 8 children between 15 and 25, and then all their children will be in school by the time the mother is 30 years old. She can focus the next 30-40 years of her life on a career at that point in her life if she still wants those things. And for all the reformed promiscuous single mothers and high body-count OF girls who convert to Christianity to try and have a fresh start in their 30s, the solution is becoming the second or third polygamous wife to a good, established Christian family man. Those two solutions would solve 80-90% of the current marriage problems in the West, especially birth rates.

@TheostasisBooks What's your conclusion?

God also literally opened and closed wombs to get Jacob to take additional wives in Genesis so he could better fulfill God's primary commandment to mankind to multiply and fill the earth. You don't think He couldn't have given Jacob 12 sons from 2 women or 1 woman, if He wanted?

@pearlythingz -Social stigma -"Tradition" -Convenience in all things "government-related" once you have children -Women delusionally thinking marriage is "safer" for them specifically because the government essentially holds a club over their husband's head for the rest of their lives...

If people stop having sex once they get married then why do people get married at all

Probably because they're so physically comfortable and pampered in this modern world of material convenience and emotional/mental fear/trauma that they incorrectly prioritize emotional security in a relationship over normal masculine physical protection, provision, leadership, etc. They also probably want to feel "unconditionally loved" by a man because they're codependently externalizing their self-worth, and erroneously believe they need that level of external emotional security in order to go through all the physical emotional changes required to have a baby, instead of taking 100% accountability for how they personally think and feel about everything in their life, including proactively promulgating mindfulness techniques in their daily life.

Why do women think it's okay to get fat in a relationship? The entire comment section on this one is people telling her she should dump him

@paleochristcon @StefanMolyneux Probably because atheists often fall prey to the stupidity of things like utilitarianism and veganism because they can't justify a rational hierarchy of values and preferences, because that leads one inevitably to a belief in ultimate good on the one hand and evil on the other.

@StefanMolyneux Can you explain why the suicidal empathy is much higher from godless progressives than christian conservatives then?

Christians cannot defend their civilization because they have strong tendencies to pathological 'empathy' and martyrdom. I'm telling you - it's rational philosophy or nothing.

@MicheleMon7364 @Mishtrash @CahtDoge @TheEcho13 A woman is killed by a male partner or relative every 10 minutes worldwide. In that same period of time (every 10 minutes), 1000 male babies are killed by their mothers in the womb. Modern women kill men 1000x as often as men kill women.

@TheostasisBooks @Mishtrash @CahtDoge @TheEcho13 A misnomer. Not being responsible with your sperm then blaming the recipient for the outcome. Me kill women for being pregnant so your argument is without merit. Bye.

If women only want you when they’re economically dependent on you for survival, they don’t want you.

@Mishtrash @CahtDoge @MicheleMon7364 @TheEcho13 No, it's statistical psychology. About 2-3% men (depending on the population in question) show clear traits of clinical narcissism. It's about 39-58% of women (again, depending upon the population in question). City dwellers tend to be more narcissistic than rural folk.

@TheostasisBooks @CahtDoge @MicheleMon7364 @TheEcho13 Most wouldn't? Even married women can be raped by their husbands. Yes, they have to be smarter than men. Women are beautiful and desired. They are the ones pursued. You see that as narcissistic, when it is male projection.

@Mishtrash @CahtDoge @MicheleMon7364 @TheEcho13 Yes, a man could physically intimidate a woman, but most wouldn't. Women, being smaller, weaker & generally unable to control a man by force, tend toward verbal and emotional manipulation, even deluding themselves. This is why they're 20x more likely to be narcissists than men.

@CahtDoge @MicheleMon7364 @TheostasisBooks @TheEcho13 Men are physically stronger than women and can easily coerce or trick a woman. That's why "stealthing" has become a crime.

@Mishtrash @MicheleMon7364 @CahtDoge @TheEcho13 😂😂😂😂😂

@TheostasisBooks @MicheleMon7364 @CahtDoge @TheEcho13 Do you think men don't force some women to have an abortion. Men make the decision as much as women do.

@Mishtrash @MicheleMon7364 @CahtDoge @TheEcho13 So what do you call it when women murder their own babies in the womb 2,000x as often as men murder women?

@MicheleMon7364 @CahtDoge @TheostasisBooks @TheEcho13 When men hate women, they rape and murder us. When women hate men, we stay away from them. The fact that a woman wants to stay away from men is seen as disrespect and hate shows how different our experiences in life are.

@Mishtrash @MicheleMon7364 @CahtDoge @TheEcho13 Funny, 'cause I see a lot more men avoiding modern women.