ThinkForWealth

Most people think: “Make more money = build wealth” I thought the same. I was wrong. For years I focused on earning more …but nothing really changed. Then I understood this: Wealth isn’t about how much you make. It’s about what you do with it. Simple: Earn → Keep → Grow Most people only do step 1. That’s why they stay stuck even when income goes up. If you’re making money but not building wealth, you’re not alone. You’re just missing the basics.

I know someone who had €25,000 sitting in the bank. For years. He didn’t want to risk it. So he did nothing. After 5 years: Still €25,000. Now compare that to someone who invested it simply. Nothing aggressive. Let’s say ~5–7% per year. After 5 years: That €25,000 could be around €32,000–€35,000. Same money. Same time. Different decision. That’s the cost of doing nothing.

@0xLuxi It’s how you handle small money that decides what happens when it scales.

If you don’t respect small money, you’ll never see big money.

@elonmusk Crazy level of precision. Stuff like this really makes you think where this could be in 5–10 years.

Neuralink

@NoLimitGains Big headline… but the real impact comes from how things unfold from here.

@benkellyone Some of it is distraction… but a lot of people just don’t have a plan for their money.

You're not broke. You're distracted. • DoorDash 4x a week • Subscriptions you forgot about • Keeping up with the neighbors • New phone every 2 years • Upgrading the car, never the income A few years of focus can fund the next 50.

@NoLimitGains This is not just about AI. It’s about how fast the system is changing. Companies move for efficiency. But people need time to adjust. That gap is where problems start.

🚨 China just ruled that firing workers to replace them with AI is illegal. Here’s what actually happened. A tech company in Hangzhou fired a worker after replacing his role with automation. They offered him a reassignment at a 40% pay cut. He refused, they terminated him. Court ruled: ILLEGAL. The companies’ legal argument was that AI adoption counts as a “major change in objective circumstances” under Chinese labor law, which allows dismissal. Courts in Hangzhou and Beijing both rejected it. AI adoption is a voluntary business decision. The cost of that decision cannot be transferred to the employee. Before any AI-driven termination, companies must now offer retraining first, then reassignment at fair pay. Only after both fail can they terminate, and only with full compensation. The US has no equivalent ruling. No federal protection, no precedent. 170,000 American workers were laid off citing AI this year alone. Not one of those dismissals triggered a legal challenge that stuck. China is deploying AI faster than almost any country on earth. They’re not slowing it down. I’ve been here for a very long time and when I make a new move in the market, I’ll mention it here. Make sure you’re following with notifications on, this is very important. Many people will wish they followed me sooner.

@connorcrd The issue is… people build the image first, then try to catch up financially. It should be the other way around.

if you're broke, don't act like you're rich.

@The_MMW The problem is… most people use money to upgrade their lifestyle, not their freedom.

Money is the tool. Freedom is the goal. Never confuse the two.

@QC_Capitals It can be. But a good yield doesn’t mean much if nothing else is growing.

Is passive income through dividends actually worth it?

If you’re making money but still not building wealth, this is usually what’s missing: You don’t have a clear way to manage it. It’s just: Earn → Spend → Repeat No structure. No control. Try this instead: → Decide how much you keep (even €100–€200) → Move it to a separate savings or investment account as soon as you get paid → Don’t touch it That’s it. Not complicated. But this is where things start to change. Most people don’t need more income. They need a clear plan for their money. Because without a plan, more money just disappears faster.

Getting a higher salary feels like progress. And it is… at the beginning. Then something you don’t really notice happens: Your life starts adjusting to it. Not dramatically. Just small shifts: €800 rent → €1,200 Cooking → ordering more €3 coffee → €5 coffee Nothing crazy. But 6–12 months later: That “higher salary” feels… normal. Now you need it just to maintain your lifestyle. I’ve seen people go from €2k → €5k/month …and still feel like nothing changed. Why? Because income grew. But nothing was kept. If you don’t control this early, you’ll repeat it at every level. More money won’t fix it. Only behavior will.

@InTheAssembly Big outcome. But moves like this come from conviction + positioning. Not just capital.

A 25 year old just turned $225 million into $5.5 billion in 12 months. Here’s exactly what he bought. Leopold Aschenbrenner got fired from OpenAI in April 2024. He spent the next few months writing a 165-page thesis predicting AGI by 2027. Then he launched a fund and put his money where his thesis was. He bought zero Nvidia. Zero Microsoft. Zero Google. Zero Amazon. He bought what AI actually runs on. Bloom Energy (BE), power infrastructure for data centers. Up 1,422% in one year. Lumentum (LITE), optical components that move data between chips. Up 1,331%. Sandisk (SNDK), storage. Up 3,130%. CoreWeave (CRWV), GPU cloud infrastructure. Up 166%. Iris Energy (IREN), AI computing and data centers. Up 583%. The thesis was simple: every AI company needs energy, bandwidth, storage, and compute. Nobody was buying those. Everyone was buying the AI companies themselves. He was right. His fund now manages $6 billion. Backed by Patrick and John Collison of Stripe and former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman. I’m adding this to my watchlist. Every time he files a new 13F, we will break it down here. Turn on notifications so you don’t miss the alert, this is VERY important. Many people will wish they followed us sooner.

@NoLimitGains Insane. When things move like this… it usually means we’re entering a new phase.

Holy shit. This is absolutely insane. We are in uncharted territory.

@Brownmoose Maybe. But Dubai works like that for a reason. Not every country is built the same.

@ThinkForWealth_ Maybe other gov should take note instead of always rising taxe

If you make a $100,000 salary per year, you owe • $45k in taxes if you live in France • $34k in taxes if you live in Canada • $18k in taxes if you live in USA • $0 in taxes if you live Dubai. Can anyone explain to me how Dubai does it?

@mskoriwilson True. Making money is one part. Keeping and growing it is another. Most people never learn that.

The 1% of people who actually make it are the people who take responsibility for their own lives. They don't wait for the world to change. They change themselves.

@Steezehuman Not even close. You just haven’t started yet.

I’m 27 - no job - no girlfriend - no friends - no money - no hairline - no sociallife - no savings - no brain cell - no wifi(stealing neighbour’s) - no food Is it over for me?

@AccentInvesting Earning is powerful. But without keeping and investing, it doesn’t turn into wealth.

Your greatest asset isn't your house or your car. It is your ability to earn and invest.

@InTheAssembly If it was truly “too dangerous” you wouldn’t be reading about it here. Attention > truth most of the time.

Something crazy just happened and nobody is talking about it. Anthropic built an AI model so dangerous it refused to release it publicly. That model is now sitting inside the NSA. Claude Mythos found thousands of zero-day vulnerabilities across every major operating system and web browser. THOUSANDS. Over 99% of them were still unpatched when Anthropic announced the model. It can outperform human experts at building exploit chains that lead to full system takeovers, in software that has been audited millions of times. Dario Amodei said the fallout “for economies, public safety, and national security, could be severe.” So Anthropic didn’t release it. They gave it to roughly 50 companies under Project Glasswing, including Apple, Microsoft, Google, CrowdStrike, and JPMorgan. Defenders only, controlled access. $100 million in usage credits. Then the Pentagon called Anthropic a “supply-chain risk” and ordered defense contractors to stop using their technology. The White House called them a “radical left, woke company.” Meanwhile the NSA kept using Mythos anyway. Now Anthropic wants to expand access to 70 more organizations. The White House is blocking it, citing compute constraints and national security priorities. The same administration that banned the company is now trying to control who gets the weapon. CrowdStrike, Palo Alto, and Zscaler got crushed in the days after the announcement. Because if one AI can find every vulnerability in your product before you do, what exactly are you selling? If you want to know where WE are deploying capital next, turn on post notifications this is very important. Many people will wish they followed us sooner.

@LarkDavis Everyone wants to grow. Few know how to keep. That’s why: Earn → Keep → Grow in that order.

What's your biggest financial focus for the next 6 months?