Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Astro
12K posts
Astro
@Thomisticae
Roman Catholic. Strict Observance Thomist. Kabab Enjoyer. “Cognitio enim Trinitatis in unitate est fructus et finis totius vitae nostrae.” D. Thomae Aquinatis
Katılım Kasım 2021
500 Takip Edilen8.4K Takipçiler
@Thomisticae @WalmartThomist Whatever helps you sleep at night!
English
St. Bellarmine wrote these works 400 YEARS AGO and the Gregorianum won't let us scan them? Bastards.
The saints obviously intended their works to be the common possession of the Church. These policies spit on their memory and are an injustice and a disgrace.
Ryan Grant: Cigar smoking pseudo-intellectual 🚬@chesterbelloc3
@AllanRuhl @WalmartThomist No, they wouldn't let me scan it when I was there 8 years ago.
English
Astro retweetledi
Funnily enough...Thomas Stapleton accuses the Protestants of Platonizing in their view of justification, not of Nominalism. 🤔
English
@DeThomist I wonder why almost all pious and all learned men of history have been exclusively Catholic, and not Jew, Muslim, Protestant, Eastern or Oriental "Orthodox".
English
@Thomisticae Some of the men with the most wisdom and intelligence in history just happened to be Catholic… I wonder why.
English
While others affirm that negative reprobation too depends on the foreseen sins. But whatever the case may be, we do believe in DOUBLE predestination, and more properly, we believe in a QUADRUPLE predestination: 1. to grace, 2. to glory, 3. to fall into sin, and 4. to damnation.
English
🧵You seriously need to stop. Reprobation is twofold, negative and positive. Loosely defined, the former is the permissive decree of the divine will for individuals to fall into sin, while the latter is the eternal punishment.
Shameless Popery@ShamelessPopery
Yes, predestination to Heaven is both biblical and Church teaching. However, we reject the Calvinist notion of “double predestination” in which God predestines some people to Hell: “God predestines no one to go to hell; for this, a willful turning away from God (a mortal sin) is necessary, and persistence in it until the end. In the Eucharistic liturgy and in the daily prayers of her faithful, the Church implores the mercy of God, who does not want ‘any to perish, but all to come to repentance’ (2 Peter 3:9).” (CCC 1037)
English
@Danieltrs01 @BessyNic @Eugenikos3 @AyoLuhY 15 year old african dummy, I'm gonna tell your parents to take away your phone, you bark too much.
English
English
@BessyNic @Eugenikos3 @AyoLuhY He doesn't know any of this, because these guys read scholastics by ctrl + f (search function). Some of these re-tards came up with an insane idea that "Suarez taught active spiration was an ens rationis" 🤣 And then I humiliated them and they all disappeared.
English
@Eugenikos3 @AyoLuhY Maxo, I will try to charitably help you to see for yourself why what you wrote is absurd, ok?
Bear with me for a moment.
Can you define for me “terminus”? Hint: V Met. 1022a1-14, also check St. Thomas’ Lect. 19.
And can you tell me how terminus qui/quod and quo differ?
English
@Eugenikos3 @AyoLuhY What in the world have I just read?
Congrats, another illiterate and laughable thread.
God tests my patience regularly by putting such things in my path.
English
@BessyNic @Eugenikos3 @AyoLuhY There are literally no intelligible statements in any of his slides. None of those words even mean anything. I am waiting for him to show me how these words actually mean anything. It's like saying "pure act good being hahaha cheese moon, sun, earth, universal, therefore, etc."
English
Astro retweetledi
@Thomisticae This is actually an argument of credibility that can be developed
English
Astro retweetledi
Although Scripture can be used to demonstrate certain teachings are wrong, the teaching of the Church suffices to identify errors.
Kevin Fernandez@sincead33
St. John of Damascus says that the Church's tradition is the rule of believing and those who reject it are unbelievers.
English
@averagelutheran I do, and you are super dumb. I never said these are the arguments, but propositions. I am calling propositions dumb, it doesn't matter how good the defense is if a proposition is erroneous. Does it matter if you write 700 pages to defend the proposition that "God is a creature"?
English
