Tim Carcosa

@Sir_Dammed With the steam machine, trannies can bring their beanbags to life to play games with them!

The fuck am I looking at, bro

@miku_memesv2 @realhansard Cambridge!

@realhansard I like all the broken third world “English” in the replies of the original post

I don't even know what this means. What on Earth is mehndi?

@xwanyex I was expecting this post to end with 'This post is not about baseball.'

@ShaunDucky @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer Actually it's against the law.

@TimCarcosa @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer Look he can fuck your mum all he likes, you don't seem to mind.

Apparently in the New Diverse 007 First Light videogame. James bond is saved by a woman 3 times including the end

@ShaunDucky @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer "Hey mom, I'm arguing with this guy on X - I need to know if you would like to fuck this other guy who goes by the handle Uptown NYC? No? Gottem!"

@TimCarcosa @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer He said fuck every woman, that includes your mum. Mine wouldn't give consent, so are you calling him a rapist?

@ShaunDucky @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer If you meant something else mate you should have written something else, as you wrote it you're mad he's not really fucking your mom. Now all of a sudden you're saying you don't want him fucking your mom - why not? What's wrong with your mom?

@TimCarcosa @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer Fucks any woman, thats the meaning of incel. Dickhead.

@ShaunDucky @NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer Lol "you aren't a superspy who saves the world and fucks my mom? Fucking incel! You should save the world and fuck my mom in real life, like I do!"

@NYCUptown1 @Mangalawyer You need that in a video game because you can't IRL fucking incel.

Sometimes to troll left-wing journalists who ask me, "So, how do you define real German" I answer: "A real German is a German who is supposed to feel guilty for his past." The reactions are always priceless.

@therealrukshan @KeiranDinnie @Paul__Templeton Pacific islanders appreciate Australian statecraft and defence in my experience. I bet they'd like it a lot less if we lived on the other side of the planet and demanded special treatment like trying to outlaw negative comments about Aussies committing genocide.

There can be powerful organisations sure, especially in the west. Those lobbies represent the interests of the communities or groups involved usually citizens, and there can be international crossover. Even the union movement could be viewed as a lobby here, and we see the issues that can cause politically. So yeah it's not without it's problems. However if we are to apply these standard and especially people that worry about Israel, what do the people in Pacific nations think when Australia pours in billions to random projects to buy influence? It's even more blatantly done by governments in the West sometimes.

There’s a growing contradiction in the so-called “civic nationalist” camp that needs to be called out. They repeatedly tell us that Australian identity is not about race, history or ancestry — it’s just about “shared values.” Loyalty to Australia is all that matters, they say. Fair enough. If that’s truly their position, then let’s test it. If civic nationalists genuinely believe in putting Australia first above all other loyalties, then they should be the strongest supporters of ending foreign lobbying in this country. Yet many of the loudest voices pushing civic nationalism are noticeably silent — or actively hostile — when groups like the Australian Lobby Group call for an end to foreign influence and ethnic lobbying in Australian politics. This is the contradiction: If your loyalty is truly to Australia alone, why would you oppose measures that stop foreign governments and ethnic lobby groups from influencing Australian policy? True civic nationalists should be leading the charge to ban foreign donations and shut down foreign lobbying. Instead, we often see the opposite — people who wave the civic flag the highest are often the same ones deeply connected to diaspora networks and ethnic advocacy groups that lobby aggressively for their own interests. You can’t claim to be loyal only to Australian values while simultaneously supporting systems that allow foreign interests to shape Australian law and policy. If you truly believe in civic nationalism, then prove it. Support ending foreign lobbying. Put Australia first — not just in rhetoric, but in policy. Anything less is just civic nationalism in name only. @TopherField @2worldsPodcast @AusLobby @OzraeliAvi @therealrukshan @reignitedem

@therealrukshan @Paul__Templeton Foreign lobbying with authoritarian states like China and Israel is qualitatively different from lobbying with fellow high trust western democracies. Ethnonationalist nations will always out compete liberal democracies, because they're willing to fuck the 'other' over.

There are thousands of Australian lobbyists all over the world. These include individuals, government-run organisations, and corporations advocating on behalf of Australian interests and businesses. How do you think major Australian companies secure major international contracts and deals? And how do industries like mining, farming, and technology secure export/import deals? Beyond that there are various issues based Australian lobbies as well in other countries, or they do this through Foreign aid partnerships to shape Foreign policy objectives. Do you think Australians should be lobbying in other countries to benefit us, and using aid for instace in the Pacific to shape our foriegn policy objectives and other nations and industries? The people going on about foreign lobbying are conspiratorial when explaining it, but don't deal with the reality of the practice that we also engage in. Let me know your opinion on above and I'll try give my views, I just need to know you understand this is something we benefit from as well.

This whole ethnic vs civic fight is a psyop to keep the right divided. They don't want you centring Australia's Anglo-Celtic heritage because when you start thinking in trust hierarchy terms the idea of importing fucking Isis brides loses even the veneer of compassion. #auspol

@andrewlawrence Bud you need to lock down your skinsuit, your victim's pupils are visible in your eyes alongside your own.

Useful idiots.

@CROWSMEMORY @Paul__Templeton @2worldsPodcast @therealrukshan No one denies Aboriginal connection to the land. What we reject is ancestral guilt and word games that dress up hunter-gatherer realities in modern sovereignty rhetoric to undermine the nation built in 1788.

No one denies modern Australia was built through British colonisation and Anglo-Celtic institutions. What people reject is the idea that dismissing Aboriginal history, identity and sovereignty as “word games” somehow makes your own narrative historically superior. It just exposes the limits of your understanding.

The white Australia lobby has been pushing ethnonationalism and the mantra of racial purity while openly dehumanising non-white people for the past few months. These same people then act mystified when conservatives on the right with migrant heritage push back against their rhetoric and views. The next two years in Australia are going to be particularly unpleasant on topics of immigration and race, so if you’re going to engage in these debates, expect to hear differing views that might offend you.

@CROWSMEMORY @Paul__Templeton @2worldsPodcast @therealrukshan Nationalist. Nation is in the word. The Nation of Australia was built by Anglo-Celtic people. The land the Nation of Australia was built on is not the same thing. The entire edifice of indigenous Australian politics is built on word games.

I agree. We should all respect what Australia was built on. That would be the blood, dispossession and survival of Aboriginal people, the people who belonged to and cared for this land for tens of thousands of years before colonisation. You can’t talk about the foundation of Australia while erasing the original foundation beneath it ✌🏽

You're much more of a slave to the 1% that commit 50% of crimes than you are to the 1% that create 40% of the wealth.

@DaveDavos2 @SBS @RitaPanahi @rowandean @RealAndrewBolt AI image transformation is getting really good, I asked grok to re-create this picture of her as a Muppet, and check out this amazing result!

Neha Madhok is a regular on SBS. They, them, it Madhok claims to be an expert consultant on anti racism. Madhok advocates that white Australians should "fuck off back to England" because of their skin colour. So @SBS is promoting racism. @RitaPanahi @rowandean @RealAndrewBolt

@TheMilkBarTV @therealrukshan History is recorded. By definition. It is not history otherwise, it is myth. Indigenous Australians have a connection to the land that is indisputable, but it is not a history - and calling it history abuses the prosody of the word to invoke a warped perspective of reality.

There is no such thing as an “ethnic Australian.” Australian is a nationality, not a race. I’m Anglo-Celtic on both sides. One side of my family were convicts brought here with the First Fleet; the other emigrated from Britain in the 1960s. If you did a DNA test, the convict side obviously wouldn’t have an “Australian” strand of DNA that the other side doesn’t. They’d look very similar, aside from the usual mixed bag of ancestry. That isn’t to say Australia wasn’t built on British and Anglo-Celtic traditions - of course it was. And that’s largely why my Scottish and English grandparents, and their children who moved here in the 1960s, could assimilate so easily. But Australia is, and always has been, more than that. The history of Australia began long before the First Fleet landed and has evolved rapidly since, thanks in part to the contributions of many different ethnicities. What Australia is, and what it means to be Australian, has evolved over time as well. The problem we’ve arrived at is that we can no longer agree on what that means. That’s because many people want to deny the fact that this country was built on British and Anglo-Celtic traditions, while others want to reduce Australia solely to that - or solely to what came before it. Both groups are living in the past, and I think most Australians are bored with both. The reasonable middle ground is recognising that we owe a massive debt to British and Anglo-Celtic traditions - and yes, that includes colonialism. We can acknowledge the wrongs that were committed while also recognising that an incredible country emerged from it. Aboriginal Australians were here for tens of thousands of years. Anglo-Celtic Australians for hundreds. Both understandably have a massive stake in this country. But there are also the countless migrant communities who helped shape modern Australia. Italians and Greeks in particular transformed Australian food, business, hospitality, and culture, while Chinese, Lebanese, Vietnamese, Jewish, and many other communities made enormous contributions to the country’s economy, institutions, and way of life. Modern Australia was not built by one group alone, even if its core foundations were British and Anglo-Celtic. The reality is that Australia’s core institutions, laws, language, and democratic traditions are overwhelmingly British and Anglo-Celtic in origin, and pretending otherwise is dishonest. That heritage should be recognised, honoured, and embraced. But modern Australia also sits on a continent with tens of thousands of years of Aboriginal history behind it, alongside generations of migrant contributions that have helped shape the country’s culture and identity over time. To be Australian is not about race or blood - it’s about embracing, contributing to, and respecting that shared national story in all its complexity.

@awhitelash @Partisangirl It's either 31 or 2 million, they aren't sure. But it's one of those. At first I read it as 15.5 million but that would be ridiculous.

@Partisangirl what number is 31/2 supposed to be?

How many Jews are there in the world? 43 years ago the population of Jews in the world was 15 million. - source Washington post. Now they tell us it’s still 15 million, something doesn’t add up. What’s so special about that number? A thread 🧵

I don't really see these super bunkers billionaires like Altman and Zuckerberg are building as expressions of fear, more autism. Largely due to all the elaborate high tech bunkers my teen friends and I designed in preparation for when we became millionaires (it was the nineties).