AzureMist

8.1K posts

AzureMist

AzureMist

@TinaAzureM

Katılım Mayıs 2016
26 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg Because the people will never oppose the gov no matter how often it does bad things as long as there is a pretense of "i'll just vote for {insert same party but different colour} next time"
English
0
0
0
1
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg the property is the paper with the writing, not the idea it transmits you could copy it but you would ruin your reputation and no one would want to trade with you anymore
English
0
0
0
3
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg So, there's a difference between an idea and blueprints/plans. Then, I insist, why should it be legal to let people buy plans, if not to coax others not to copy it?
English
1
0
0
5
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg because it was an example for the single biggest force that drives down wages of course old people are another issue but it's only really a problem due to the the wage depression in the first place, if you can't reitre you can't. I can't speak for spain so i won't comment on that
English
1
0
0
6
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg Why should women do such a thing? Why shouldn't old people retire and let it just be? Around half the population here in Spain isn't working here in Spain, told by those who are in working age and don't and those who aren't. Therefore, it is already occurring.
English
1
0
0
6
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg no because it is not the companies who do any of this, it is the gov, and no the gov is not supposed to be the "overseer of the companies" The companies are not acting against the will of the gov because they can't, their very existence as a company relies on gov approval.
English
1
0
0
4
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @emptimas @AllyFogg If it's so, give me some examples of this induction. So, the gvt is the bad guy because he is supposed to be overseer of the companies and the companies still find their way to mess it, is it what you mean?
English
1
0
0
6
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg you would not buy the idea, you buy the plans. like how something is made with what materials etc. for example: patent: car you buy detailed instructions on how to build it so that you don't have to develop it yourself but you can just develop it yourself
English
1
0
0
5
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg realistically? you can't it's borked there is no way out idealistically? women should all voluntarily return to being housewives. Slashing the labour force by effectively 50% would improve wages, but i am not deluded enough to think that such a thing could ever happen
English
1
0
0
6
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg it is observation and history not just "supposition" "printing" in the literal sense is not often the case but as you yourself said rates are an inflationary force and those are under the purview of the government
English
1
0
0
4
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @emptimas @AllyFogg You suppose "people doesn't have foresight", which is just a supposition which could be solved by teaching those who want to be taught. Also, the gvt doesn't usually print money just like the Moon Knight meme, it's proven itself really bad, and it only occurs when there's not +
English
2
0
0
11
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg Because the government profits through the control of certain corporations. Patents aren't. Someone making something that would infringe on a patent does not infringe on property rights, ideas are not property, just like numbers aren't.
English
1
0
0
6
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg Inflation is effectively taxation. If the government does something ie print money like during the coof days they can gain a lot of short term political capital at the cost of the devaluation of the currency, and since most people have no foresight there are no real cons about it
English
1
0
0
7
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @emptimas @AllyFogg I know some doesn't want to learn, yet it's clear that if they're shown reasons since the first time they would undertand them, their number will (likely) decrease until they aren't anymore a problem.
English
1
0
0
6
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@NoahKamara99 @katakana_kurisu @Mateuschannel @narryyonce @_ggLAB >japan never apologized >>japan apologized here source >b...but many politicians deny it >>so apologies don't matter until every japanese person accepts it? >b...but i didn't say that >>you implied it >s...strawman that's a strawman reeeeee you are just a dishonest person tis all
English
1
0
0
18
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg no because monopolies require the gov to stamp out all competition, or create hurdles that make it impossible for someone to start competing. This includes patents for example
English
1
0
0
8
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg banks are not private entities they are highly regulated government organizations that parade themselves as private. just look at the process to start your own bank, any organization that has the capability to move inflation is a highly regulated and controlled arm of the gov.
English
1
0
0
5
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @emptimas @AllyFogg Which policies? And there are private ogs with the capability, its name is cryptostuff. Also, the gvt isn't the only who increases inflation, banks (through interests) and also other companies do. Part of the evidence is the 2008's real estate crisis in Spain.
English
1
0
0
5
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg Y tú sugieres que la respuesta es dejar a unos pocos capturar los bienes sin aportar ningún esfuerzo más, mientras otros necesitan vender su fuerza de trabajo como algo vital, probablemente muriendo si son incapaces de venderla más o si nadie la comprase por su verdadero coste.
Español
2
0
0
17
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg They are in fact not doing that ebcause they do not have control over the economy. The government through its policies increases inflation, no private organization has the capability to increase the money supply.
English
1
0
0
9
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @emptimas @AllyFogg That first paragraph's false, he coerts you by attacking your positive freedom, your freedom to have real choices (not to starve to death or work to death). How does inflate the gvt the currency? Also, some of them take the money which you earn over the minimum wage.
English
1
0
0
17
AzureMist
AzureMist@TinaAzureM·
@487Maximo @emptimas @AllyFogg they are in the same situation which is having their property rights infringed on by the government, the only difference is that they can cope with it due to having a bigger "buffer". And sure if people did do that it would but that's not how reality works and people won't do it
English
1
0
0
8
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @emptimas @AllyFogg They aren't "in the same situation", they can make mistakes, those who have nothing but their own don't. About the second paragraph, I have to insist: if people pressures the gvt, then it probably won't have any choice but to land right the wages (which would be +
English
2
0
0
15
Aitor Martínez R.
Aitor Martínez R.@487Maximo·
@TinaAzureM @Vaulter67 @AllyFogg And you suggest the answer is to let some captivate the goods without putting in effort while others need vitally to sell their workforce, likely dying if they're unable to sell it anymore or if there's no one willing to buy it at its actual cost but at one lower.
English
1
0
1
15