Andrew Young

257 posts

Andrew Young

Andrew Young

@Tojosan1664

Katılım Kasım 2024
73 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
WeGotitBack 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇸
Liberal woman is UPSET with Sharon Osbourne for wanting to attend the Tommy Robinson UTK rally… “Glad your husband ( Ozzy ) cheated on you and he’s Dead” These liberals are nasty people
English
1.4K
882
3.9K
88.4K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@JuliaHB1 It’s the first briefing you’d ask for moving into the post. Either she knew already or wanted plausible deniability. Labour have a different definition of plausible.
English
0
0
1
312
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@tom_watson Says a man whose first speech in the Lords was an apology for peddling false sex scandal claims. 🤮🤮
English
0
0
0
25
Tom Watson
Tom Watson@tom_watson·
He is many things but Keir Starmer is not a liar.
English
9.6K
354
2K
423.9K
Lee Hurst
Lee Hurst@LeeHurstComic·
@TMurfin101 Because it’s worth putting up one last fight for my kids.
English
26
1
79
7.3K
Lee Hurst
Lee Hurst@LeeHurstComic·
Restore isn’t going to win the next General Election, guaranteed. If Reform DOESN’T win the next General Election, neither Restore or Reform will ever win a General Election after that, guaranteed. We have one General Election left. If we fail, you should get out as soon as you can as we will be done.
English
697
493
2.5K
103.3K
The Green Party
The Green Party@TheGreenParty·
"You’ve got to start taxing the rich and actually making them pay." Green Party peer Jenny Jones on making sure the wealthiest actually pay what they owe on BBC Politics Live.
English
273
439
1.2K
87.3K
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
This is the key to it. To believe No.10 you have to believe Robbins unilaterally took it upon himself to override the vetting. Of itself an incredible action. But even more ludicrously, that having done so he told no-one in No.10.
James Cleverly🇬🇧@JamesCleverly

It’s clear that No10’s strategy is to make the FCDO Perm Sec the scapegoat. There is ZERO chance that someone who’d just been appointed would risk their entire career by NOT telling the FS about the vetting. Perhaps verbally rather than in writing, but he would have been told!

English
94
383
1.6K
64.3K
Kosher
Kosher@koshercockney·
A throwback to Starmer saying Mandelson passed the security vetting. We found out today that Mandelson failed the vetting and he gave him the job anyway. Starmer flat out lied to the public.
English
9
35
166
16K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@afneil Labour MP’s wouldn’t recognise competence if it slapped them in the face. This is standard mendacious behaviour so a non-issue, move on.
English
0
0
4
522
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
We now have the Government response: Neither the PM nor 10 Downing Street nor the Cabinet Office knew the Foreign Office had decided to ignore the fact Mandelson had failed his security vetting. Call it the ‘know-nothing’ government. But it leaves a major question unanswered: why would the FO take it on itself to make such a huge judgement call — and not inform/consult Downing Street? What was in it for the FO? It hadn’t even necessarily wanted Mandy, unlike Starmer and the 10 Downing Street operation. Doesn’t add up.
Andrew Neil@afneil

BREAKING NEWS (with the potential to be massive): The Guardian reveals Peter Mandelson failed advanced security vetting before becoming US ambassador. He was initially denied developed vetting clearance in January 2025 - weeks after Keir Starmer had officially announced his appointment. Foreign Office was ‘encouraged’ to deploy a rarely-used power to override the recommendation from security officials. The Government promised total transparency on the Mandelson affair after MPs forced it to release of a batch of documents about the process. But nothing it has released reveals this startling fact. Indeed, Starmer has always insisted Mandelson was subject to 'security vetting, carried out independently by the security services, which is an intensive exercise that gave him clearance for the role'. Developing …

English
1.1K
2.3K
10.3K
419.3K
Will Coleshill
Will Coleshill@WillColeshill·
Restore Britain🇬🇧 is Polling THIRD in Wales! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🟢 Green - 22.9% 🌼 Plaid - 14.7% 🇬🇧 Restore - 13.2% 👈 ➡️ Reform - 12.9% 🌹 Labour - 12.8% 🌳 Tory - 9.9% 🔶 LibDem - 4.9% Restore🇬🇧 currently leads Reform & Labour by a narrow margin. @FindoutnowUK (15th-16th April) LINK ⬇️
English
284
466
3.7K
272.8K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@DPJHodges He’ll get away with it. At least Teflon Tony did it with panache.
English
0
0
0
549
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
I'm not even sure what the debate is now. It's crystal clear what happened. Keir Starmer decided Peter Mandelson was going to be his ambassador. The process was then gerrymandered to ensure he got what he wanted. The statement to the House due process was followed was just a lie.
English
154
830
3.9K
38.8K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
Maybe the US war gamed the Iran after all…. The blockage gives China limited options; ask the IRGC to ride shotgun, use their own SF or allow the USN to turn tankers around. Ludicrous to suggest this wasn't planned for.
English
0
0
0
14
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@DPJHodges Whisper it but men have worse outcomes than women. When’s Wes calling out misandry? Again just a tummy rub to a key Labour voter demographic. So cynical.
English
0
0
0
87
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
Whisper it. But Wes Streeting is doing a good job as Health Secretary, and Labour MPs are starting to notice. Was a narrative that his proximity to Mandelson had killed his leadership chances. I'm not so sure.
Wes Streeting@wesstreeting

Making sure women have more choice, voice and power in the NHS. Tackling the everyday sexism and medical misogyny that sees women dismissed and caused avoidable harm. Faster access to better care. Proud to launch the @UKLabour Government’s Women’s Health Strategy today 👇🏻

English
214
36
349
86.5K
Suffragent
Suffragent@Suffragent_·
FFS‼️There is no ‘medical misogyny’. If anything, men’s health needs focus: 🟥Men die sooner 🟥NHS spend less on men 🟥Prostate cancer screening recently blocked 🟥Men lead in 9 of top 10 killer diseases 🟥Most doctors are women @wesstreeting @andrewgregory @VickyPattison
Suffragent tweet media
English
31
78
276
5.4K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@triffic_stuff_ Reid and Balls make my skin crawl. I’d help fund a psychological study of their viewers. They live among us.
English
0
0
0
285
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
This is absolutely infuriating to watch! 😤 Susanna Reid and Ed Balls on GMB are twisting Robert Jenrick’s words like the parents of Axel Rudakubana have done NOTHING wrong, framing it as if anyone is just blaming parents for their kid’s crimes. That’s a blatant lie and they know it! NO ONE is saying that! What Jenrick, the inquiry, and basic decency are crystal clear about: the parents FAILED catastrophically in their moral duty. They knew their son was stockpiling weapons and knives (delivered straight to the home), making threats, and escalating dangerously, yet they stayed silent out of “misguided” fear he’d be taken into care. The official Southport Inquiry report lays it out brutally: • The parents “bear significant responsibility” and “bear considerable blame” for failing to alert authorities to the risk their son posed. • Their actions were “misguided and irresponsible” and a “complete abandonment of responsibility” that was “utterly unconscionable”. • “If AR’s parents had done what they morally ought to have done, AR would not have been at liberty to conduct the attack and it would not therefore have occurred.” • “If the full extent of [the family’s] concerns had been shared with authorities in late July 2024 – including on the day of the attack – it is almost certain this tragedy would have been prevented.” • The inquiry confirms this atrocity “could and should have been prevented”. Those three little girls – Bebe King (6), Elsie Dot Stancombe (7), and Alice da Silva Aguiar (9) – would still be alive today if the parents hadn’t abandoned their responsibility. They bear very considerable responsibility. Full stop. So yes, after failing so catastrophically, they don’t deserve to stay in this country. Deport them. It’s basic accountability and justice for the victims. But Ed Balls is just playing pathetic gotcha politics, trying to trip Jenrick up with some irrelevant “what if” about the Windrush generation or Caribbean roots, asking if they’d still be sent back to Jamaica. What a disgusting smear, implying this is about race or nationality when it’s NOT! It’s about actions. It’s about protecting British kids from danger. Jenrick rightly pushed back hard on that nonsense. This kind of deliberate distortion from people like Balls and Reid is exactly why the country is in such a mess, with monsters like Rudakubana slipping through and innocent lives destroyed. They care more about shielding these failures and playing identity games than the safety of our people. Pathetic. Disgraceful.
English
139
222
1.3K
98.7K
Anti Woke Memes
Anti Woke Memes@AntiWokeMemes·
Is Greta Thunberg a Communist or a Retard? 🤔
English
5K
537
2.6K
116.8K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@GeoffNorcott lack of coverage is just another symptom of the same underlying problem. Who are scheduling/commissioning programmes.
English
0
0
0
408
Geoff Norcott
Geoff Norcott@GeoffNorcott·
THIS is what I’ve been clumsily trying to discuss on the podcast 👇 It’s a brewing issue but gets practically zero bandwidth compared to manosphere.
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

ANGRY YOUNG WOMEN by @emilylawford and @Scarlett__Mag It was a Wednesday night and seven members of the University of Leeds’ feminist society had invited me to join their book swap. I asked how they felt about the young men they knew. “I don’t care for them,” said a girl called Ruby imperiously. “They’re not bad people, but they refuse to call out their friends who make other girls uncomfortable. They’ll laugh at jokes that are sexist, racist, homophobic, they don’t care about political issues… I don’t think they like women a lot.” If a man is attracted to you, she said, he might talk about things like toxic misogyny. If he doesn’t fancy you, he won’t bother. “I feel like a lot of it is quite sexually motivated with men.” I asked if they’d consider dating a man with different political views. They all immediately said no. “I don’t think I’d even be friends with one,” said one girl. “They don’t see you as human.” Only one woman, Evelyn, admitted to having male friends (though she was worried this made her a “pick me”, trying too hard for male attention). Evelyn was concerned about what the men she knew were watching online. “The stuff that’s being said about women is crazy,” she said. “They’re getting all these reels, talking about, like, bad stuff about women. And I get reels of women saying bad stuff about men. I try to think, not all men are like this, but…” On the internet, women and men have never been more alienated from each other. While the toxic, often hard-right politics of the manosphere have been exhaustively documented, the new generation of female influencers are nearly as extreme – just on the other side of the political spectrum. The “femosphere” spans a range of tones: there are misandrist dating coaches who urge women to reject men altogether, and more explicitly progressive content creators who cover global and domestic politics. Exclusive polling by Merlin Strategy for the New Statesman reveals that young women, aged between 18 and 30, are by far the most progressive demographic in the UK. Young women are 26 percentage points less likely to feel positively about capitalism than young men, and much less likely to feel the economy works in their favour. Gen Z women are more likely to support causes such as feminism, environmentalism and anti-racism than young men. They also feel much more negatively towards young men than young men feel about them. I spent the last few months in search of the new left-wing young women. It wasn’t difficult – they were everywhere. But it all felt impossibly bleak. They weren’t excited about their futures. They didn’t like the men they knew, or the idea of those they didn’t. Men were just a threat who had the potential to harm or trap them. This will almost certainly make relationships harder: fewer than half of young women feel men understand them. Young women are much less likely than men to date people who disagree with their politics. People will get lonelier, and angrier. Young women are twice as likely to not want children as young men. And it’s getting worse. Women under 25 are most likely to believe things are “stacked against me, no matter how hard I try”. A significant majority of young women feel isolated from the rest of the country. The two main political parties aren’t reaching out to them specifically. Many women told me they feared a Reform government pressuring them to have babies. Many say they will vote for the Greens in the upcoming local elections, but few seem to believe that will make a difference. They don’t feel represented by mainstream politics, and they don’t think anyone cares. Cover art by Carl Godfrey

English
19
4
117
21.7K
Andrew Young
Andrew Young@Tojosan1664·
@NewStatesman @Scarlett__Mag If you tell generations of girls that they’re princesses/girl bosses (take your pick) don't be surprised if they‘re confused when life disappoints.
English
0
0
2
1K
The New Statesman
The New Statesman@NewStatesman·
“Young women feel a lot more negatively towards young men than the other way around” – @Scarlett__Mag
English
121
93
593
66.5K