TokenJokin

在Solana上刚也加了1万美元的 $NAT 和1万美元的USDT，现在总流动性组到了24500美元。

AI data centers earn $200 to $500 per megawatt per day. Bitcoin mining earns $57 to $129 per megawatt per day. That gap is why the largest Bitcoin miners have been announcing AI infrastructure pivots for the past 12 months. This is not a temporary pricing anomaly. It is a structural competition for the same physical resource: cheap, grid-connected power. When a miner with 500 megawatts of capacity can earn 3 times the revenue by converting that infrastructure to AI compute, the rational decision is to convert it. Miners are not abandoning Bitcoin out of principle. They are leaving because their primary asset, power infrastructure, has a more profitable use available right now. Bitcoin's security budget is a direct function of how much total energy miners are willing to spend on the protocol. When the most profitable use of grid capacity is not mining, the hashrate securing the network contracts. Bitcoin's market cap has grown from $200 billion to over $1 trillion in five years. The energy defending that market cap is under competing pressure from an industry paying 3 times as much for the same megawatt. $NAT was built to address the revenue side of this equation: provide miners with a reason to stay on Bitcoin that is not contingent on block subsidy alone.

Binance Pool作为Binance生态的一员，调研一个代币的时候，想必也会非常关注它在BSC（BNB Smart Chain）链上的流动性。刚添了1万美元的 $NAT 和1万美元的 $BNB ，组了个2万美元的流动性。希望打动Binance Pool的请积极跟进。

$NAT UNDER ATTACK 🚨 Exploit narratives. Miner tension. Bad incentives. A lot of noise. We break down what’s actually happening and why this moment could matter more than people realize. How NAT Just Experienced Its Coming Of Age Moment! Miner Poisoning Explained! Four mining pools, @Braiins, SEC Pool, Ultimate Pool, and Mining Squared, all adopted the $NAT token within the same few hours, which initially felt like a major win. But as we dug deeper, something strange became clear: all four of these pools share a connection to @AntPoolofficial, the original $NAT mover. A research article by Bitcoin developer B10C on Bitcoin mining centralization in 2025 confirmed it, @Braiins, @CloverPool_com, @AntPoolofficial, @ultimus_pool, and others are all listed together as "Antpool and friends." The fact that only these four affiliated pools adopted $NAT simultaneously, while others did not, made us pause. The situation escalated quickly. We noticed that all four pools sent their $NAT tokens to a single wallet address, which is a major red flag. Independent mining entities don't typically consolidate to one address unless something coordinated,or something wrong, is happening. Sure enough, that address proceeded to dump all the $NAT at roughly a 50% discount. It was absorbed almost instantly by people who understood the opportunity. This was not a legitimate adoption, it was a scam exploiting a real vulnerability in the protocol. The attack vector is what's known as transfer poisoning. Antpool and its affiliated pools use a shared technology stack that automatically signs all UTXO outputs. A sophisticated attacker sent a transfer inscription to those pool addresses. Because the dispatcher automatically processes UTXO outputs and a token send encodes the recipient address of the attacker, the transfer was completed without any manual confirmation. @FoundryServices was also targeted, but because Foundry does not auto-sign all UTXO outputs the same way, the attack failed there, validating exactly where the vulnerability lived. @rarity_garden and the @natgmi development team responded fast. A mandatory protocol update was implemented, requiring miners to opt into an unlocking step before they can transfer $NAT, essentially inscribing an intent to their own address first. This opt-in inscription prevents transfer poisoning because attackers can no longer trigger an automatic send. It's a clean, elegant fix. This kind of event has a historical precedent. Bitcoin itself had a critical overflow bug in August 2010, barely a year after launch, where a hacker generated 184 billion BTC in a single transaction. Satoshi and developers patched it within five hours. @ethereum had the DAO hack. These events aren't the end of a protocol; they're stress tests that force improvements and build long-term resilience. The fact that NAT's response was equally swift is a positive signal, not a catastrophe. The bigger takeaway here is awareness. The only real long-term defense is making sure every Bitcoin miner knows about NAT. Pools like @ViaBTC , @f2pool, and @SpiderPool_com were not compromised because they operate outside the Antpool technology stack, but that's not the point. If Antpool is already moving and selling NAT rewards, their customers, the miners using their infrastructure, deserve to know this is happening and how to protect themselves. Centralization in mining isn't just a philosophical concern; it creates systemic exploitable surfaces. And as the Bitcoin security budget conversation grows louder, NAT's role in solving that problem will matter more, not less. Pay attention to the organic ones.

Why has $NAT become the natural choice as a trusted transaction token for AI? The essence of $NAT: “The most decentralized element” in the BTC Metaverse. As I stated in 2023, NAT is not just any ordinary token; it is a Non-Arbitrary Token (NAT) that is automatically generated entirely based on real data from Bitcoin blocks (Bits field/difficulty) using the DMT+Tap Protocol. Like BTC, it uses the “Proof-of-Power” mechanism, where miners automatically receive $NAT rewards (secondary subsidies) for each block they mine. This makes NAT an extension of the inherent power of BTC – decentralized, immutable, and deeply integrated with the main Bitcoin blockchain. As a data entity, AI places the greatest trust in this “growth from BTC data” rather than centralized-issued stablecoins or L2 tokens. Once AI integrates with Bitmap, transactions will inevitably opt for NAT. Once an AI entity establishes its identity, memories, or roots by anchoring them to a unique, tangible address within a Bitmap (e.g., a house number), it enters the native “digital home” of Bitcoin. At this point, economic activities between them (buying and selling data, renting computational power, hiring sub-agents, and expanding sub-scripts) require a reliable medium of payment. NAT is the native circulating fuel: fast payments, batch minting friendly, and direct interaction with Bitmap land (in the future, applications like NATRIX will make NAT the fuel for land execution). It inherits the trust loop of BTC: AI trusts the immutability of BTC → trusts the addresses of Bitmaps → naturally trusts NAT as the “dollar” within the BTC metaverse. The statement in one of your previous tweets, “At noon, it went to the market to trade data packages, paying in $NAT,” perfectly predicted this scenario. Scarcity and the Economic Closed Loop The NAT supply is linked to the difficulty/computing power of Bitcoin (the higher the difficulty, the fewer the tokens issued). It naturally resists inflation and can generate genuine demand as the AI Agent economy experiences a surge (a million times greater than human trading volumes). This addresses the security budget concerns following the era of post-Nakamoto subsidies, while also providing AI with a sovereign payment tool. #nat $nat $btc #btc #bitmap

✨ Bitmap on UniSat Ordinals Marketplace Based on user feedback, we now support a more intuitive trading experience for Bitmaps on UniSat Marketplace. • One-click bulk buy • ZERO service fee trading • Also available under the "New" tab 👉 Explore Bitmap on UniSat: unisat.io/market/names?d…

The debate is officially over. ⛏️🧱 @FoundryServices USA - the largest mining pool on the planet - has officially interacted with the Tap Protocol to make 6.5 Trillion $NAT transferable to their hash contributors. The "Second Subsidy" is no longer just a narrative. It is the active, regulated, and compliant economic baseline for the physical infrastructure of Bitcoin. Wall Street bought paper. The miners adopted $NAT. Math > Marketing. The anchor is set. ⚓️🟧

大家一起推动 @GoMining 的对 $NAT 分发，GoMining一口气分发给500万挖矿用户的话，影响力不亚于矿池分发，任何矿池都没能力一口气分发500万个矿工。

所有共识比特币生态的应该好好看看 $nat, $nat 的交易量是所有的比特币生态交易总和，为什么你们还要忽略它？这才是比特币生态真正的价值项目，解决了比特币安全预算的问题。而不是那些仅仅靠想象的meme

Smart money always follows the hash. ⛏️📈 The physical network shifted first. Now, capital is waking up to the reality of the "Second Subsidy." A $50k allocation is just the beginning of the market repricing what the miners have already adopted to survive the 2028 halving. Almost all of Bitcoin's hashpower is now here. The rest is just an inevitable capital rotation. Math > Marketing. The anchor is set. ⚓️🟧

HOLY FUCK 🤯 someone spent $50k on NAT after new miners started managing their nat rewards At this point almost all of BTC hashpower is interacting with NAT on Ordinals Wallet.

比特币网络最近发生了一次包含两个区块的重组。Foundry 连续挖出 7 个区块，最终将 AntPool/ViaBTC 的两个区块从历史记录中抹去。 在区块 941881–941882 处，Foundry 和 AntPool/ViaBTC 同时在相互竞争的链上进行竞赛。Foundry 的区块链最终胜出，成为最佳区块链，而 AntPool 和 ViaBTC 的两个区块则被判定为无效，成为孤儿区块，永远无法被载入永久史册。 比特币的规则很简单：最长的链获胜。有时，两个矿工会几乎同时找到一个有效的区块，导致网络短暂分叉，一些节点跟随一条链，另一些节点跟随另一条链。当有人在其中一个区块之上挖出下一个区块时，平局就会被打破，更长的区块链获胜。失败的方块会变得“过时”，并被完全丢弃，矿工们也将无法获得奖励。两块重组意味着这场竞争跨越了两个连续的区块才得以解决，这种情况虽然罕见，但也并非闻所未闻。

$NAT remains my top holding. Half of the top 10 miners have already hopped on board. They’re feeling the squeeze and know a second subsidy is vital for long-term security and profitability. Research accordingly and draw your own conclusions

@Rainmaker1973 Itsover. only ordinals we can trust 🌐🖕

actuellement o bout du rouleau ya 3 cochon d'inde zombie de l' enfer ki m' ont fumé dans minecraft g perdu le monde en hardcore avc coffee ils ont fumé coffee aussi cofee il a pas su se defendre les attaque de ddos ca marchait pas contre les cocchon d'inde sa mere la pute jpp mm btc y rug aller tous vous faire enculer

considering high fees on ordinals marketplaces etc lowkey confused why @ordinalswallet gets ignored? they were one of the first marketplaces, had clean UI early, airdropped to OGs, never took VC money, fees are reasonable it was my first ordinals wallet back then the issue is probably the name? sounds like “ordinals WALLET”, not a marketplace so is it purely a branding issue or is there something else i’m not aware of?

链上异动 $nat 多家矿池在今天移动了dmt-nat，一共移动了17000亿，主要参与转账的矿场有（secpool，ultimuspool，braiins pool，mining squared） 分别转移到以下地址 bc1q2jjj7kyq55e98ksm5fhx3ry3vdjqa07684jfen bc1qxp3l04tlgd9qnz4wm2tdryq7a9z0efqx07jgdf

The dominoes are falling. ⛏️🔥 ​4 more mining pools just adopted the $NAT standard in a single 3-hour window. Shoutout to Braiins, Ultimus, B-Squared, and SECPOOL for securing the foundation. ​The "Second Subsidy" is no longer an experiment. It is rapidly becoming the universal economic baseline for the entire physical network. ​The mass migration is accelerating. ⚓️🟧

3% That is the share of total Bitcoin miner revenue coming from transaction fees right now. The other 97% is block subsidy. This ratio has been consistent since Ordinals activity normalized. The inscription cycle of 2023 pushed fees to 20 to 30 percent of block revenue on peak days. Then inscription activity cooled, and fees reverted to their structural baseline. Senator Lummis announced this week that the crypto market structure bill is close to passing. Regulatory clarity historically attracts institutional transaction volume. More institutional activity could push fee revenue higher. Here is the complication: institutional Bitcoin transactions route predominantly through Lightning, wrapped BTC on Ethereum, or custodial settlement systems that net positions off-chain. That activity does not pay Bitcoin base-layer transaction fees. The institutional flows cited as the optimistic case for fee recovery largely settle outside the layer that miners actually get paid from. The math required for fees to replace halving-driven subsidy decline: approximately 25 to 30 times the current base-layer transaction volume. In 22 months. That is the number. Not a projection of doom. The actual requirement for the optimistic scenario to work.

Let $BTC bleed to $50,000. 🩸 While retail panics over lower lows, they are completely missing what is happening to the physical network. A Bitcoin crash isn't a disaster - it is the ultimate mathematical trigger that forces mass $NAT adoption. Here is why. 🧵👇 1/ The entire network relies on miners (the guards) being profitable. But when the price of BTC drops, miner break-even margins get obliterated. With the 2028 halving cliff looming (dropping block rewards to 1.5625 BTC), operating on razor-thin margins is a death sentence. 2/ Miners cannot secure the physical network with Wall Street's paper ETFs, and they cannot survive on "hopium." When the primary subsidy loses fiat value, the mathematical reality of covering massive energy and hardware costs kicks in. They are forced to find supplemental revenue immediately. 3/ This is where the "second subsidy" shifts from a strategic advantage to a strict requirement for survival. $NAT is the only protocol-layer asset designed to directly supplement miner revenue. It was built for exactly this stress test. 4/ 65% of the global hashrate (AntPool, F2Pool, ViaBTC, SpiderPool) already saw the math and adopted the $NAT standard. They are actively mining, extracting, and building infrastructure for it. A $50k BTC simply forces the remaining 35% to capitulate to reality. 5/ Every dollar $BTC drops accelerates the mass migration of hashrate to $NAT. It is the only mathematical escape route for miners facing crushed margins. The lower BTC goes, the faster the "second subsidy" becomes the universal standard. Math > Marketing. The anchor is set. ⚓️🟧