@chaiteavanilla@Desabr1na@kepalv “i want yaoi not _____” yea they lit said theyre not into it..im a literal csam victim the fact that u ppl try so hard to say its the same as loli is disheartening
@Tokoupsi@Desabr1na@kepalv no they're not, lol! you sound young af so I feel bad, but kepalv in that thread is defending lolicon. the OG thread is about some ppl saying it's a lolicon figurine. kepalv is saying that lolicon doesn't harm "real" children, which goes against every established global research
@Tokoupsi@Centipettle@kepalv@Desabr1na follow the tweets you dickwad, they wrote that lolicon doesn't harm real children. this is where reading comprehension comes into play, and bitch if you were employed, you'd not it's a federal holiday in the US. CSAM defender squad linking up I see
@Tokoupsi@Desabr1na@kepalv in the same why I forget when I refer to PMOS as PCOS, it's just a misspeak bc these are quite literally brand new terminologies that will take getting used to. doesn't change the argument that jerking off to images of children fictional or not to be fucking vomit inducing.
@chaiteavanilla@Centipettle@kepalv@Desabr1na well if u read the original post u would see that its about figurines? u could be spending all this time filling out a job application btw
@Centipettle@kepalv@Tokoupsi@Desabr1na If that post isn't about porn, why did they suddenly suggest lolicon doesn't harm "real" children? they've made that argument MULTIPLE times by forcing a distinction. CSAM of fictional children still normalizes and creates demand. who lacks comprehension here?