Kevin Chu🇨🇦🇺🇸

@falsures If we don't do something, it’s only a matter of time before they destroy the world.

@TomcatVF41 D’expérience française attention : quand vous libérez un pays islamistes, les habitants ne vont pas vous dire « merci ». Ils vont prendre la victoire pour la leur, puis votre pays libérateur devient pour eux le prochain pays à abattre.

Bonjour les Canadiens, juste une question : quand Trump vous insulte, vous le prenez mal ? Où vous vous couchez juste parce qu’il a de l’argent ? (vraie question pour comprendre la mentalité nord américaine)

@falsures I totally agree.But for me, the goal isn't to hear 'thank you'; it’s to eliminate a direct threat to our own security and values. We do what is necessary to protect our way of life, regardless of whether the liberated appreciate it or not.

@falsures Believe me, I understand how you feel. Honestly, I think the situation France and Canada find themselves in isn't all that different. 🇨🇦🤝🇫🇷

@falsures @MosiniElisa Funny how you ruled 1/11 of the world but couldn't hold your own capital for more than 6 weeks in 1940. Maybe if your generals focused more on defending Paris and less on running colonies, you wouldn't have needed the US and UK to liberate you.😂😂😂

@TomcatVF41 @MosiniElisa Oui après Napoleon, la France avait juste colonisé 1/11 de la planète 🤡

French General Michel Yakovleff: "American officials need to stop snorting cocaine between meetings" I genuinely need to master the unapologetic French art of roasting Americans 🇨🇵🇪🇺

@PalabresCitoyen @MosiniElisa You asked for 'one other country.' Here it is: The Soviet Union in WWII. They lost 27 million people—making Verdun look like a skirmish. While your generals were busy collaborating or being occupied, they were the ones who actually marched into Berlin

@TomcatVF41 @MosiniElisa La premiere guerre mondiale, on a tenu seul contre l Allemagne. Les Usa sont venus intervenus en 1917 à la fin!. Et dans cette guerre il y a eu la bataille de Verdun. 300 jours à environ 1000 morts par jour. 300 000 morts 400 000 blessés. Cite un pays qui a fait ça. Un seul.

@PalabresCitoyen @MosiniElisa 'Alone'? Without the British Navy's blockade and the millions of Commonwealth troops, Verdun would have been a French graveyard long before 1917.

@PalabresCitoyen @MosiniElisa When was the last time France won a war alone? I’ll wait.

@TomcatVF41 @MosiniElisa Apprends l'histoire de France et le nombre de batailles gagnées par un pays depuis son existence avec les dates des batailles. Et reviens quand tu seras instruit.

@A_Revelator @Microinteracti1 Napoleon was the last time a French general actually knew how to win. Since then, it's been all talk and no victories.🤣

@Microinteracti1 A French General! 😆 When is the last time the French have done anything militarily?

A French general just looked at Trump’s plan to build a runway inside Iran to fly out uranium under active bombing. His response: “American officials should stop snorting cocaine between meetings.” This is the same man who called joining Trump’s war “buying cheap tickets for the Titanic after it hit the iceberg.” The French are not holding back. Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

@MOSSADil Ground troops are now a necessity. We've reached the point of diminishing marginal returns with air strikes.

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. A-10 Warthog attack aircraft reportedly crashed near the Strait of Hormuz at roughly the same time a U.S. F-15 was downed over Iran, according to U.S. officials cited by the NYT.  Both incidents come amid escalating combat operations and ongoing rescue efforts for downed aircrew. Stay connected, follow @MOSSADil.

The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage.

Food for thought. Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface. The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities. Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed. In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines. In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive. A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent. By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right. In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

@severus1960jan9 烂到一定程度就不如不看了。怕哪天被气死……

英国的沦陷，除了信仰上的背离以外，从X平台的流量也能看得出来。 Severus的时政评论，基本涵盖美，加，澳，英四个国家。其中美，加，澳总有网友积极讨论，唯独英国完全没有声音。 今年1月份至今，英国政府多次表态，不排除全国禁用X。 从这个趋势来看，英国ban X只是时间问题。

In the near future, the world will be left with only three forces: the United States, the Communist Party, and Islam.

@mark_slapinski Supporting the move, but skeptical about the outcome. Can Quebec really stand its ground against the federal narrative?🧐

WOW: The province of Quebec has decided to CRACK DOWN on Muslim rights, banning people from praying in public or in Universities. How do you feel about this?

@severus1960jan9 跟绝大部分欧洲人和加拿大人一样蠢……

今天澳洲民调显示，61%的人由于油价上涨而责怪川普总统。 按这些人的逻辑，警察出警，跟黑帮火拼，这中间产生的费用，都要怪警察？弱智的世界就是这样，谁先动手就怪谁。 我其实多次强调，川普总统不仅没有发起战争，相反，他在尽最大努力捍卫世界的和平。而油价的微涨，就是和平的代价，也是最小代价。 如果川普总统今年没有出手，那么未来战争发生时，所有人付出的代价，远远超过今天的油价。 任何无脑责怪川普总统的人，你本质上应该先责怪你的智商，然后跟川普总统道歉。

@WellsJorda89710 I don't know how he has the face to say that. I'd be too ashamed to speak.🤮🤮🤮

🚨 Canadian PM Mark Carney: “Muslim Values Are Canadian Values” — So Sharia Law, “Kill the Infidels,” and Child Marriage Are Now Canadian Values Too? 🔥 "Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney just declared: “Muslim values are Canadian values.” Think about what that actually means. Under strict Sharia law: - “Kill the infidels” is commanded in multiple verses. - Child marriage is not only permitted — it’s modeled after Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha at age 6 (consummated at 9). - Apostates face death. - Women have half the legal rights of men. - Gay people can be executed. So according to Carney, all of that is now “Canadian values”? All across the Western world — Canada, UK, France, Germany, Sweden — treasonous leaders are reading from the exact same script: open borders, mass Muslim migration, and pretending incompatible ideologies are “enrichment.” They’re not importing people. They’re importing a parallel legal and cultural system that rejects Western civilization. When does the West wake up? This isn’t tolerance. This is suicide. What do you think — is Sharia-compatible with Canada (or any Western nation)? Drop your thoughts below. 👇 #MarkCarney #Canada #ShariaLaw #MuslimValues #CanadianValues #IslamInCanada #WakeUpCanada #TreasonousLeaders #WesternCivilization #NoSharia #MAGA #AmericaFirst"

@DuoHong44622 为了黑而黑就没意思了，一个社会事件非要往政治上靠！

春秋航空公司党员驾驶员李俊杰不知好歹，上了副部级大佬的空姐，被人把作案工具给噶了! -则震惊航空界的爆炸性丑闻在网络疯传。春秋航空第八中队副驾驶李俊杰，因与公司空姐长期保持不正当关系，东窗事发后竟遭残忍报复，其阴茎被直接割断，血案现场惨不忍睹。目前李俊杰已紧急送医，生命虽暂无大碍，但下体重创恐永久丧失性功能，职业生涯也彻底断送。据知情人士透露，李俊杰今年 32岁，已婚育有一子，在春秋航空工作多年，飞行经验丰富外表斯文、口才极佳，常被同事称为“机舱暖男”。然而私下里，他却多次与同公司年轻空姐发生婚外情。事发前，两人关系已维持近两年，空姐多次要求李俊杰离婚未果，最终选择将证据曝光给其妻子。妻子在极度愤怒与绝望下，联合亲属将李俊杰约至酒店“谈判”过程中情绪失控，使用利刃对其下体实施了残忍切割。 李俊杰日常照片现场目击者描述，酒店房间血迹斑斑，李俊杰痛苦倒地哀嚎，场面极为恐怖。涉事空姐目前已配合警方调查，妻子及相关人员也被控制。春秋航空迅速发布内部通报，暂停李俊杰一切飞行职务，并表示将配合警方调查，强调公司对员工私德问题零容忍。

Don't you have a clue? It's exactly because of deadbeats like you holding everyone back!