𝕋𝕠𝕤𝕙𝕚 M. 寿 | ฅ^._.^ฅ

Most Traders lose money This is a fact; 99% cannot seem to find a way to extract profit from the markets with any regularity This is why the good traders make such outsized gains, we collect the monies of the impatient, inexperienced and uninitiated (we will call them iiu)

Have you heard people saying Ai will take away all edge from markets?? Leaving nothing left for us fleshbags to manually exploit??? I for one am salivating at the thought of trading against the next cycle's counterparties; overtuned systems the creator knows nothing about since they prompt-engineered the whole thing, turned it on, and as long as it traded, didn't care to look at a single line of code Foaming at the mouth to counterparty these bots.

He first gained fame by going on radio shows and curing depression, phobias and lifelong mental illnesses live on air. He achieved lasting results, in 30 minutes to a few hours, with people who had been going to therapy for years From there, he kept on adding layers to his business. Now, the real juice is the people you meet at his seminars. Great network building venue.

What’s the lore on Tony Robins He screams “he’s just another guru” to me but somehow he gets mentioned by a lot of people I believe to be astute What’s so great about his “methods”

People really can't figure out for themselves when something is psyops. They need Zach to spell it out for them

Ok, Trump doesnt care about the markets right now He went from announcing bad news after market close on Friday, to announcing bad news for Monday

Profitable Traders are extremely sensitivity to subconscious intuition. When a fleeting connection is bridged in the mind for millisecond it is observed, noted and likely journaled about. All to strengthen that connection and increase awareness Dreams, Meditation, Intentional Breathing All increase the likelihood of these connections being made internally and the ability to coax them into the conscious mind 👁

@TommyThornton Satire*

@TommyThornton Mission Accomplished

Bitcoin is flirting with the 2023 cost basis, and trying to not close the Daily below 200EMA I was eyeing a higher push, but the passive Asks at $74k had other plans. A Daily close below $65k and I’ll position like price is going to $60k $78k is the logical resistance, but macro weakness is keeping that out of reach for now.

Oil&Gas companies are the new shitcoins

Since every trader left crypto for tradfi, a lil fun fact: Did you know that Robinhood routes orders to wholesalers? → Citadel Securities → Virtu Financial → Two Sigma Securities → Jane Street → Susquehanna Robinhood: → sent to a wholesaler → executed internally by the wholesaler → trade reported to the tape as "off-exchange" Basically feeding retail's orders to the wolves of wall st for a small fee Google "PFOF" (JSYK, Fidelity does not accept PFOF for stock trades (they do for options), and Interactive Brokers allows users to bypass it for a fee)

I really need to start releasing a video with the text post

and yes I realize Epstein was heavily involved in crypto. I thought about this a lot. The TLDR is that Leon Black didn't pay him hundreds of millions of dollars in BTC and he was never in meaningful danger of being unbanked so crypto wasn't actually essential to the operation of the cartel, bc the fiat system was heavily protecting it (BNY processed $378 million of wires for him all the way up til 2019, when he got a new MS bank account set up). it's more likely that Epstein was interested in crypto bc he knew the cartel of bankers, knew they were pervs/psychos and that the money supply was infinite. he has multiple emails where he's basically getting insider FX info -- so was basically putting on the trade he knew better than anyone else was correct going through the emails there are virtually no examples of him like sending Gates a USDT address. the system allowed Epstein to operate, bc Epstein, in all probability was part of the system the question is ultimately "do you want a central actor in control of the money supply or do you want an algorithmic system where individuals don't have to trust a central actor" and that question, in my view, is definitively resolved. The "Gold Question" -- i.e "is gold a viable monetary primitive" -- I think is separate from this. Essentially the internet / international commerce is essential to economic freedom in a fracturing world order and individuals cannot believably transact in gold without crypto rails so -- it's a question of what the correct rails are to facilitate a break from the fiat system. bc the fiat system is terrible. and it's very clear that answer is blockchain based assets. other ppl have their reasons, but this is an important one for me

Still valid Level just higher now, 5k Will be 6k, then 7k in 2026

Really difficult for price to go up when Asks get walked down each price drop.

Hello 200 Weekly EMA, my old friend I’ve come to talk with you again 📉 Because the market's scared of quantum Price is visiting near the bottom And the hope for a reversal was in vain Only pain... Within the sound of silence. 🕯️

@0xngmi what i'm hearing is, we need to do price-based unlocks so teams have incentive to pamp it

x.com/i/status/20222… arxiv.org/pdf/2602.11457 ​Before this paper, we thought breaking RSA-2048 or Bitcoin’s encryption would require 20 million physical qubits. This paper provides a theoretical blueprint to do the exact same thing with only 100,000 physical qubits. A 200x reduction in the hardware needed. Real vs. Theoretical * The Paper is theoretical. It’s a highly sophisticated mathematical roadmap and resource estimate. No one has actually built a 100,000-qubit machine yet. * The Progress: While the full machine doesn't exist, the error-correction math (called QLDPC) that makes this "shorter path" possible has recently been proven to work in small-scale lab tests by companies like IBM and QuEra. What This Means for Bitcoin You might have heard it only takes 2,330 logical qubits to break Bitcoin. That’s still true. The problem has always been that "logical" qubits are perfect, and real "physical" qubits are glitchy. * Old Math: You needed thousands of physical qubits to make one logical one. * New Math: You only need a few dozen. For Bitcoin, this means the hardware requirement just dropped from millions of qubits to somewhere around 30,000 to 50,000 physical qubits. We are currently at about 1,000, so the "finish line" just got closer. How to stay safe? The "Golden Rule" hasn't changed: Don't reuse addresses exchanges....🧐☠️ Why dont reuse? Welp, because the first time you use a Bitcoin address your public key is only exposed for the time that it takes the transaction to be mined. But if you reuse that same address your public key is now inscribed on the blockchain forever. A quantum computer needs to "see" your public key to work its magic. As long as your Bitcoin is sitting in a fresh, unspent address (like those starting with 1), your public key is hidden behind a hash. The quantum computer can't break what it can't see.

youtu.be/XbPoetEmQJE Very selective info in his presentation; one-sided but fair points. Was expecting Charles to pitch his Quantum fund at the end of this talk(lightly did)

Bitcoin encryption vs. quantum threat Documenting posts/media I've consumed and found useful in developing my own framework for considering Q-day risk

Coinbase Premium fighting for its namesake Would be bullish confluence to get a consistent +$100 premium back