JCGoesAIArt

40.2K posts

JCGoesAIArt banner
JCGoesAIArt

JCGoesAIArt

@TrickleDownMan

AI Aficionado. Using AI to its fullest. My Book Store https://t.co/7Iryr9ZcOU

USA Katılım Aralık 2022
1K Takip Edilen949 Takipçiler
Ally
Ally@AllyJKiss·
Alex Jones had the Hodgetards and Carrie Prejean Boller on his show today to tell us that Christians have more in common with Muslims- that they have “nothing in common with Jews” … and more of the usual ‘Israel owns Trump’ horseshit. So sick of it.
English
466
212
1.3K
88.8K
🇺🇲Misty🇺🇲
🇺🇲Misty🇺🇲@MistyBluefla·
Anyone that claims to be a Christian and defends Islam is a fake Christian.
English
89
73
590
7.3K
𝐓𝐌𝐓
𝐓𝐌𝐓@TMT_arabic·
The prayer of a citizen in Gaza: ​"We have no one but You, O Allah. Our children are dying. O Allah, bring frustration and defeat upon Israel and America."
English
146
2.2K
6.5K
44.6K
JCGoesAIArt
JCGoesAIArt@TrickleDownMan·
@MaxNordau Muhammad was the creator of shit. No credible evidence for a Muhammad from some city called Mecca.
English
0
0
0
2
Max 📟
Max 📟@MaxNordau·
What's your favorite depiction of Muhammad, the creator of Islam?
Max 📟 tweet media
English
123
69
617
12.1K
TurLevnon
TurLevnon@MarounTurLevnon·
Just FYI: Mary of the Bible, the Mother of God is not the mariam of the coran Jesus, our Lord and Savior from the Bible is definitely not issa from the coran. Its fine to find common ground with people, but not at the expense of truth.
TurLevnon tweet media
English
7
16
68
1.5K
MTA-Liban-USA 🇺🇸🇱🇧☦️❣️
Yes and no. They took the idea of Jesus and Mary and changed it to suit their narrative. Don’t forget that during Mohammed time, Nastorian Christianity, Judaism and paganism were the prominent religions of the Arabian peninsula. The belief in Mary and Jesus we’re taken from Nastorian Christianity who in turn believed differently than Catholics or orthodox in terms of Jesus’s humanity and divinity.
English
3
0
1
82
JCGoesAIArt
JCGoesAIArt@TrickleDownMan·
What your employer pay does not come out of your income. So a W2 individual pays 6.2% until 166K at which time it stops. If you are a 1099, then you pay 12.4 up to 166K then it ends.
Senate Budget Democrats@SenateBudget

MURRAY: Is it true that people making under $184k pay a 12.4% Social Security tax rate? DAHL: Yes. MURRAY: And the rate for someone making $1 million? DAHL: 2.2%. MURRAY: So, a 12.4% tax for people making less than $184k, but 2.2% for a millionaire or .0002% for billionaires.

English
1
0
0
13
Steven Pundt
Steven Pundt@StevenPundi6nd·
@TrickleDownMan Correct and they charge customers for the service. The charge covers employees payroll cost which part of social security that 6.2% you think is free.
English
1
0
0
3
A.Y.O
A.Y.O@YusufAsunmogejo·
Good evening Dipo Aina, I know you won’t rest. I won’t either. You typed all this just to prove my point. You fell right into the trap and handed me the textual contradiction I have been pointing out to you. I owe you no apology because your own copy-and-paste job destroyed your argument. Firstly, look closely at the verses you proudly posted. You quoted Mark 15:40 saying the women were watching from a distance. Then you quoted John 19 claiming they were standing right near the cross having a direct conversation with Jesus. Which one is it? Were they far away, or were they right next to him? This is the textual evolution I warned you about. Mark is the earliest historical account, and it puts everyone far away. Decades later, the anonymous author of John decides to move the women right to the foot of the cross and inserts a male disciple. That is a theological invention. It can never be the truth. Again, look at your list of authors. You admitted Paul never met Jesus. You admitted Luke never met Jesus. You claim Mark was recording Peter's teachings. But we already established from your own book in Mark 14:50 that all the disciples fled, and later in Mark 14:66-72, Peter denied Jesus three times and ran away for his life. How can Peter who ran for his life give an account of what he did not witness Dipo? Or which Peter did Mark got his teachings from? If you are not blind, you should know the truth already. Mark's account of the crucifixion is hearsay. It is not an eyewitness account. The disciples fled. All fled. In addition, your entire claim of a disciple being at the cross rests on the Gospel of John. But serious biblical scholars know the gospels were written anonymously in Greek. The text never says I, John the Apostle, am writing this. The phrase “beloved disciple” is an anonymous figure. Claiming it was John the fisherman is a later church tradition created to give the book authority. It was never the truth. More so, your reliance on a Roman centurion —who is a pagan Roman executioner, as your reliable witness is a very desperate move. Let us take a look at this star witness of yours. Do you even know his name? The Bible does not give him one. He is just an anonymous pagan soldier. He did not write a sworn testimony. He did not author the Gospel of Mark neither. So who recorded his words? The Gospel of Mark was written in Greek by an unknown author decades after the crucifixion. This means an unknown writer who was not at the cross invented a quote and gave it to a nameless Roman soldier who worshipped Jupiter. You are building your core theology on a fabricated quote because you do not have the testimony of a Roman centurion. If that is not storytelling, I don’t know what it is. Mind you, I am not here for stories. You can reserve that for your minions. All I see is your struggle to smuggle the truth in. You can’t even do it well. You want to build a historical case, and all you could do was to build it using authors who were not there, letters written decades later, and accounts that contradict each other on basic details such as where people were standing during the event. The Quran cuts through all this confusion perfectly. Surah An-Nisa verse 157 is clear. The matter was made unclear to them. From a distance, in the chaos and trauma, they assumed they saw him crucified. Allah saved His messenger. You are the one parading copy and paste apologetics as serious historical scholarship. You better read more and help yourself in this mess you have put yourself. Thank you for learning something new.
Ainà Dipo 🇳🇬@dipoaina1

🚨 Two lies busted: 🥴 One thing I noticed about you guys is that you like picking the surface of the bible to justify whatever notion you have going on. You claim that there were no witness during the crucifixion of Jesus Christ is false, lies propaganda and fake news. - all in one 😅 Now let me explain: When you look at the crucifixion itself, the Gospels note a few specific people: 1. The women followers – Mary, the mother of Jesus, was present at the crucifixion. According to the Gospel of John (19:25-27), she stood near the cross with other women, including Mary Magdalene and her sister, Mary of Clopas. Jesus entrusted her care to the "disciple whom he loved" (John) while on the cross.  • Mark 15:40: “Some women were watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome.” Key points: • Jesus’ mother (Mary) was present at the cross. She is explicitly mentioned. • The “disciple whom Jesus loved” was also standing near the cross. Traditionally, this is understood to be John the Apostle. • Jesus entrusts Mary to this disciple, which indicates trust and close relationship. •Roman soldiers and centurions – these are not disciples, but they were witnesses of the execution: • Mark 15:39 records the centurion declaring, “Truly this man was the Son of God!” after Jesus died. 😎******You said the gospel has no connection with the disciples . Yusuf you are very wrong, just say you are ignorant of this part and you want to learn and I will happily educate you. Here are scriptural references showing the connections each author had to Jesus or his disciples, keeping it in a clear bulletin style: •Mark – Companion of Peter; closely associated with him; likely recorded Peter’s teachings. •Scripture hinting at connection to Peter: 1 Peter 5:13 (“She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark”). • Acts 12:12, 25 (Mark works with Peter and Barnabas). • Luke – Physician and companion of Paul; probably never met Jesus; collected stories from eyewitnesses. • Scripture hinting at connection to Paul: Colossians 4:14 (“Luke, the beloved physician, and Demas, greet you”). • Acts 16:10–17, Acts 20–28 (Luke travels with Paul). • He references eyewitness accounts indirectly in Luke 1:1–4. •John – “Beloved Disciple”; close follower; may have had direct contact with Jesus and his family (Mary). • Scripture hinting at direct contact: John 19:26–27 (Jesus entrusts Mary to the disciple), John 13:23 (described as reclining next to Jesus). •Paul – Never met Jesus during his ministry; met Peter, James, and other disciples. •Scripture for meeting Peter: Galatians 1:18–19 (“Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas [Peter] and stayed with him fifteen days. I saw none of the other apostles except James, the Lord’s brother”). •Acts 9:26–28 (Paul meets apostles in Jerusalem). •James – Brother or close relative of Jesus; leader in Jerusalem church; likely had firsthand knowledge of Jesus’ life. •Scripture hinting at relationship: Galatians 1:19 (James, “the Lord’s brother”). • Acts 15:13–21 (James leads Jerusalem council). • James 1:1 (Letter from James, servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ). • Jude – Brother or close relative of Jesus; connected to Jesus’ family; letters reflect early church connections. •Scripture hinting at relationship: Jude 1:1 (“Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James”). • Other apostolic letters (Peter, John, etc.) – Written by direct disciples; based on personal experience with Jesus. • 1 Peter 5:1–2 (Peter calls himself a witness of Christ’s suffering). • 1 John 1:1–3 (John emphasizes firsthand experience with Jesus). So will you apologize for lying or you’ll will deflect and move to another "surface subject of Christianity".

English
26
45
185
8K
JCGoesAIArt
JCGoesAIArt@TrickleDownMan·
@StevenPundi6nd I am going to ask your dumbass again, how does a bookkeeper make money for the business?
English
0
0
0
2
JCGoesAIArt
JCGoesAIArt@TrickleDownMan·
@StevenPundi6nd You have got to be retarded with no fucking clue how a business makes money.
English
0
0
0
2
JCGoesAIArt
JCGoesAIArt@TrickleDownMan·
@StevenPundi6nd Dumbass, a bookkeeper does not bring a business income, it's a necessary liability.
English
0
0
0
2
JCGoesAIArt retweetledi
Jai
Jai@JaiNDoC_RL·
Hey Muslims, Your scholar admitted it:
Jai@JaiNDoC_RL

English
6
8
37
572
JCGoesAIArt
JCGoesAIArt@TrickleDownMan·
@StevenPundi6nd Depends. Say I am a bookkeeper I earn no money for the company but they still have to pay 6.2%
English
1
0
0
7
Steven Pundt
Steven Pundt@StevenPundi6nd·
@TrickleDownMan Your employer pays the other half so who earns the money the employer has to pay for you.
English
2
0
0
4
Nick Matau
Nick Matau@nick_matau·
This dude, who has never read the Quran, tries to debunk the Quran saying you can strike your "disobedient" wife (after other steps are completed) by using a hadith (which he gets wrong anyways)
English
30
54
372
7K