Trinity Vandenacre

1.5K posts

Trinity Vandenacre banner
Trinity Vandenacre

Trinity Vandenacre

@Trinitycodes

YouTuber Standing up for the People of Rural America!

Montana Katılım Aralık 2011
225 Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
I think we are on the same wave length. Now we just need to cut a billion trees so the wildlife has something to eat on public lands, and lower predator populations drastically and we could enjoy hunting like the old days.
Secretary Doug Burgum@SecretaryBurgum

America’s public lands belong to the American people. @POTUS is expanding opportunities for hunters and anglers, reducing duplicative restrictions and making federal land management more practical, consistent and accessible. doi.gov/pressreleases/…

English
0
0
2
79
Maccabees mama
Maccabees mama@emma_fernandez·
I think you’re giving the morality of these lawmakers too much credit if you believe it’s actually (or at least only/mostly) about nature - that’s the gas they light people up with to pass the bill. The vast majority of these “nature loving” bureaucrats are also human hating globalists. What else could you call them when they prioritize FILLING THE OCEAN over human food production.
English
2
0
1
15
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
They say drought across the west is Climate Change, but the truth is very different. Here is the honest truth about the drought and what beavers used to do in the old west that will open your eyes to the truth.
English
23
67
515
1.7K
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
@emma_fernandez Good point. Saving nature is the excuse. Money and control are the real drivers behind the decisions. Control over all of us. Personally, I have become a human advocate. The globalist agenda is the opposite.
English
0
0
1
7
Sero Lorca
Sero Lorca@MimicoolBoomer·
@Trinitycodes But now you’re talking common sense and there’s not a lot of that going around anymore
English
1
0
2
40
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
Exactly. If you don’t store water in the ground, you don’t have reserves because we let all the snow pack from previous years go to the ocean. Water that is put in the ground still moves towards the ocean, just at a snails pace. This is not about saving this year, this is now about saving 10 years from now.
English
0
0
0
13
Fusty Moto
Fusty Moto@FustyMoto·
@Trinitycodes We don’t have snowpack this year whether you dam it up or not.
English
1
0
0
45
Brian
Brian@Oilman4570·
@Trinitycodes Nailed it. These climate dummies don’t have any common sense
English
1
0
1
12
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
@_WasatchMan Yes, which is good but storing water above ground is lost to evaporation in heat. Way more than you think.
English
0
0
0
16
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
I would like to hear it. From what I can tell, they are against using water for irrigation in any form, against dams, and against cutting timber ( forests in the west had 40-60 trees per acre in 1911, 600-2000 trees per acre in 2011 which transpire at least 6x the water before it ever gets out of the forest). To them, that is ok because humans shouldn’t use any resources. You really put a finger on the problem.
English
0
0
0
6
Dingus McMillan
Dingus McMillan@jonathanfired·
@Trinitycodes What do the human-hating enviros say when they hear this? What’s the rebuttal?
English
1
0
2
139
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
@BillBoan1 This is problem with how conservation is viewed. Keeping the water in pipes and efficiently using or evaporating it is what is viewed as best practices currently.
English
0
0
0
6
Bill Boan
Bill Boan@BillBoan1·
@Trinitycodes Is the current EPA aware of this? Sounds like something needs to change
English
1
0
2
170
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
Pond storage is definitely needed but that is very localized. Sprinklers are great but takes a ton of water and uses or evaporates all of it. “Groundwater conservation techniques” are currently not helping Idaho along the Snake. Got to put more in the ground where it doesn’t evaporate.
English
0
0
0
10
Richard Mead
Richard Mead@RmeadMead·
@Trinitycodes He’s partially correct. This doesn’t mean we bring back flood irrigation but just create more ponding basins conducive to better groundwater storage. You can have both efficient irrigation methods (sprinkler/drip) and groundwater conservation techniques.
English
1
0
2
112
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
@BJRobison5 I used that as examples because it is something that regular people may have seen but not understood. These principles work all around me. I have seen it over and over, but to relate that to the everyday person can be difficult. Hence my examples.
English
0
0
0
3
B.J. Robison
B.J. Robison@BJRobison5·
@Trinitycodes He had me until "how do I know this...watched Expedition Uknown...some other shit on YouTube." Not saying hes wrong but ill definitely need to read about this to verify one guy on Twitter who presents no science to back up his claim.
English
1
0
0
64
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
@emma_fernandez Yes, but why they want it to always flow to the ocean as fast as possible is more about “leaving nature alone” than anything else. They just forget what nature used to do to divert and store water.
English
1
0
0
15
Maccabees mama
Maccabees mama@emma_fernandez·
It’s not the takeover of the west, it’s the monetization of water. They do it everywhere, Al Jazeera had a really good documentary on the monetization of water in the Middle East. The powers that be need to control an essential resource to maintain control of the people. A means of ensuring no one, no matter how off grid, is beyond the reach of a monthly fee just to be alive.
English
2
0
4
177
Anthony Mongiello
Anthony Mongiello@amongiello·
@Trinitycodes 1.3 million gallons flow into American oceans a second. You could divert 1% and it would quadruple the amount of water deficit in the US. 1 %
English
1
0
1
80
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
This was one of the most important things that has happened to protect our freedom, our rural economies, and our hunting rights that has happened in my lifetime. This rule was the back door to losing our public lands. It was just wrapped in a “conservation” package with a “preservation” bow. The destruction we just dodged is huge! Thank you for getting that removed!
House Committee on Natural Resources@NatResources

Today, @BLMNational announced the rescission of the Biden administration’s onerous conservation and landscape health rule. Read Chairman @RepWesterman’s statement ⬇️

English
1
0
7
351
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
@SecretaryBurgum @RepWesterman @POTUS The repeal of this rule is one of the most important changes in my lifetime. I don’t know if most people realize the danger to our rural economies and food supply this rule really was.
English
0
0
0
10
Secretary Doug Burgum
Secretary Doug Burgum@SecretaryBurgum·
Couldn’t agree more with @RepWesterman. This Biden-era rule prevented energy and mineral production, timber management, grazing and recreation across the West. Rescinding it will strengthen rural economies and ease costs for American families. Thank you, @POTUS!
House Committee on Natural Resources@NatResources

Today, @BLMNational announced the rescission of the Biden administration’s onerous conservation and landscape health rule. Read Chairman @RepWesterman’s statement ⬇️

English
77
103
358
18.6K
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
You thought selling our public lands was bad? You totally missed the fact that the keys had already been sold to Wall Street! This will open your eyes to the real threat to public access!
English
1
1
8
214
Trinity Vandenacre
Trinity Vandenacre@Trinitycodes·
Not only are hunters great conservationists, but they are also the greatest direct management tool for wildlife populations, and pay literally BILLIONS of dollars per year into local economies! Environmentalist organizations spend tons of money as well. Most of that is spent either locking people out or buying land to take it out of production so humans lose more of their food supply and access.
English
0
0
0
22
Braxton McCoy
Braxton McCoy@braxton_mccoy·
Timely piece from AJ. Whether this dynamic should remain the case is in the news again. As with all things public lands/wildlife related, changes should be made with caution.
Braxton McCoy tweet media
English
11
31
248
4.8K