🦋🐬Trueblue🐬🦋🌐

Anyone else feel this way 😔

The JA Plus hotel in Pattaya 😔 hoping that people are safe 🙏❤️

@blobbers01 @HoodedClaw1974 @kjose2012 JA plus hotel in Pattaya 😳

@HoodedClaw1974 @kjose2012 We know which hotel this is pal?

🚨People trapped in hotel in Pattaya, Thailand as huge fire breaks out. Fire and rescue are battling the blaze.

Class 😁👏👏

@Paddymagic96 Happy Thursday 😁💙

Hey folks happy Thursday not that long to the weekend ❤️

How many innocent lives have been saved through people like this being locked away forever! We need prisons like this! Then maybe most of the murder's and R@pes! Would if not stop! Then decrease! They knew the rules out there! They broke the rules! Now they pay🤷‍♀️enough is enough

Starmer and the UK🇬🇧Labour government! You need to call a meeting now 🤷‍♀️ get our Borders closed! Do you really think that you are safe from these evils! They will come for you also! Already you have lost the Muslim votes! Open your eyes and look at what you've done to the UK🇬🇧😡

x.com/i/grok/share/7… wow 😳👇

Filthy vermin 🤨

I'm just hoping the dog was ok 😔🤨

We all guessed this would happen 🤷‍♀️ so who is protecting them 🤷‍♀️🤨

Wth 🤯

Khan wants everything his own way! He usually gets it with this idiotic UK 🇬🇧 labour government! We all know why 🤨

Dearlove Is Shocked. He Should Be. But He Is Looking At The Wrong People. Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, said yesterday he was shocked to learn that a senior Foreign Office civil servant had discussed Britain's nuclear deterrent in closed-door meetings with an organisation he describes as a front for China's main foreign spy agency. He called for parliamentary scrutiny of Stephen Lillie's meetings with the Grandview Institution during a four-day trip to Beijing last October. Dearlove is right to be shocked. He is looking at the wrong level. Lillie's meeting did not happen in isolation. It happened during what the Telegraph describes as a flurry of trips to Beijing by top British officials amid Starmer's deliberate thawing of relations with China. Sir Olly Robbins, subsequently sacked, lunched with Grandview experts the week before Lillie's visit. Jonathan Powell, now the Prime Minister's National Security Adviser, met Grandview before his appointment. Since becoming National Security Adviser in December 2024, Powell has met Wang Yi, the Politburo member directing Chinese foreign affairs, four times. His vetting arrangements have never been publicly confirmed. Every parliamentary question about those arrangements has been blocked. A civil servant discussing nuclear deterrent protocols with a Chinese spy agency front is alarming. The Prime Minister's National Security Adviser maintaining undisclosed relationships with PLA-connected officials through his private consultancy, while his vetting status remains secret, demands scrutiny of an entirely different order. The government's defence of Lillie's meetings is that no sensitive information was discussed. That formulation covers every difficult question this government has faced on China. The spy trial that collapsed because the government refused to name China as a national security threat in court. The super embassy approved despite a concealed underground chamber positioned within a metre of the cables carrying the City of London's financial data. The Mandelson appointment despite a due diligence report flagging China and Russia concerns. The same language. The same outcome. Dearlove warned yesterday that Chinese intelligence operates on an industrial scale, approaches every engagement with aggressive intentions, and exploits any relationship it can access. He said British officials should have been briefed in detail about the threat before attending these meetings. He said he has serious concerns about the national security adviser's previous contacts with China. Those concerns are warranted. The question Dearlove has raised about Lillie is a question about process and judgment. The question Powell's undisclosed vetting raises, alongside the spy trial collapse, the super embassy, the Indo-Pacific withdrawal, and Chinese components being embedded throughout Britain's energy grid against explicit American intelligence warnings, goes considerably further. A pattern of decisions this consistent, each retreating from Britain's interests and advancing Beijing's, each defended with the language of pragmatism and engagement, does not emerge from poor judgment alone. Poor judgment produces occasional errors. Sequential decisions, each pointing in the same direction, over two years, by a Prime Minister warned repeatedly who proceeded regardless, produces a different and more troubling question. Dearlove wants the ISC to scrutinise Lillie's paperwork. The ISC is already reviewing thousands of pages on Mandelson. Parliament has been blocked from scrutinising Powell. Scrutinise the civil servant by all means. Then ask who sent him, who knew, and why the pattern of engagement with an organisation accused of fronting for Chinese intelligence runs from the bottom of the Foreign Office all the way to the office of the Prime Minister's National Security Adviser. Sir Richard "has serious concerns about the national security adviser's previous contacts with China."

This woman is hateful 🤨 what about the grooming gangs hey 🤷‍♀️ what about the girls 😡 you are one of the cockroaches 🤨

🤯 look at his eyes 👀😨

The entitled ones again 🤨I wonder when we're gonna be entitled 🤷‍♀️🤨

This is the UK in 2026 – where a woman with genuine, NHS-documented facial injuries gets arrested by the Metropolitan Police for the “crime” of reporting them. Sophie Mojsiejenko had visible, horrific bruising and swelling around her eye and face. She did the responsible thing: she reported the assault and even had a CT scan from the NHS that officially logged the injuries as real. Yet instead of investigating her attacker, officers broke down her door, stormed in, and seized her makeup – claiming she had somehow “painted on” the injuries herself to fake the whole thing. They arrested her. For reporting being hurt. This is obscene. A woman with medical proof of assault is treated like a criminal while the actual perpetrator walks free. The Met Police didn’t just get it wrong – they went full Gestapo mode: forced entry, property seizure, and an arrest designed to intimidate and silence. All because she dared to complain about a serious incident. How does this happen in Britain? When did our police stop protecting victims and start persecuting them? When did a CT scan from the NHS become less credible than officers playing amateur makeup detective? This isn’t policing – it’s abuse of power, plain and simple. It destroys public trust, terrifies ordinary people out of reporting crimes, and reeks of a two-tier system that protects the wrong people while punishing the innocent. Sophie’s story exposes a rotten culture inside the Met. If they can do this to a woman with hospital evidence, what are they doing to everyone else? Enough is enough. We need answers, accountability, and a complete overhaul before more victims are turned into suspects for simply telling the truth. The British public deserves better than this. 🇬🇧

Not even once?

@Spooky296 🤯🤯😔

Why are you lying again Khan! there was no police abuse! Maybe you got confused with your lot! that broke that poor policewoman's jaw 🤷‍♀️