Trump Hair

Are you sick of reading Donald Trump's Tweets, do they depress you? Well then follow me and I'll make you laugh and tell you #ActualFacts

@vet_nm @alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Yup, for paying “informants”

@TrumpHair_ @alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist The primary charges in the indictment are for wire fraud and bank fraud. The evidence is clearly laid out in the indictment. People can read it for themselves. justice.gov/opa/media/1437…

Same move. Same hand on the heart, same wave to the crowd. Musk did it and gets called a Nazi to this day. Mamdani does it and those same people have not said a word. Well, not exactly. Once the side by side clips went viral, some of them did speak up. Not to apologize to Musk. To defend Mamdani. Suddenly the gesture is not the gesture. Suddenly we need to talk about arm speed. Whether the fingers wiggled at the end. Whether he was smiling. Whether his grandparents were in the right party. A year ago none of that mattered. The hand went up, the verdict came down. Now we get a forensic seminar on millimeters and microseconds to prove Mamdani's arm moved slower. Mamdani's own press office said "in no way was this a Nazi salute." Funny. Musk said the same thing. His did not count. Mamdani's did, instantly. That tells you everything. The "Nazi salute" thing was never about the gesture. If it were, they would be screaming right now. They are not. It was about Musk. They hate him because he is the richest man in the world and he was attacking their ideological piggy bank with DOGE, so they smeared him. Mamdani is on their team, so he gets a pass, plus a defense team running stopwatch analysis. Same hand, opposite verdict. A wave is a wave. The rule does not change based on who is waving. When it does, you are not watching principle. You are watching a hit job.

I made his brain 🧠 hurt

I’m gonna start leaving the blocked here The brave souls that tried to debate, got proven wrong and ran away… the brave, the bold, the Bamboozled

Are you sick of reading Donald Trump's Tweets, do they depress you? Well then follow me and I'll make you laugh and tell you #ActualFacts

@MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist ….doesn’t automatically mean SPLC supported their ideology — it can also describe the role they had while acting as sources

@MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist An informant is often someone already inside a criminal or extremist organization. Law enforcement, journalists, or watchdog groups sometimes pay those people for access, intelligence, evidence, or infiltration. So prosecutors calling them ‘leaders’ or ‘members’….

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Yeah it says they paid informants that where in the groups, no shit that’s how “informants” work 😂🤣😂🤣😂

@TrumpHair_ @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Read. Number. 9. Again. Reeeaaaaaad.

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Just because the persons in the Nazi organization is an informant doesn’t make him not a racist 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 I mean look at you

@TrumpHair_ @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Also why would an “informant” post racists sht online unless they were manufacturing racism?

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist What’s the word “informant” mean? Anyone can be an informant dumbass

@TrumpHair_ @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Read number nine again. And for the second time, since you refuse to read what I said before, why would they pay the heads of organizations. Thats not paying some random “informant”. You want to play semantics when it clearly states what the indictment is in the first three bp

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist The indictment frames this as donor fraud and money laundering. SPLC denies wrongdoing and says the payments were part of long-running intelligence and informant operations used to monitor violent extremist groups and assist law enforcement.

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Prosecutors also allege SPLC used shell companies and hidden financial channels to conceal payments to sources.

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Another source (“F-9”) allegedly had ties to the neo-Nazi National Alliance, received over $1 million, and was involved in obtaining internal extremist-group documents later used in SPLC reporting.

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist You didn’t read what you sent me… what’s the word “informant” mean?

@TrumpHair_ @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Wrong. justice.gov/opa/media/1437…

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist What’s the word “informant” mean ?

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist “Since the 1980s, SPLC operated a covert informant network (“Fs”) inside extremist groups including the KKK and neo-Nazi organizations. Prosecutors claim SPLC secretly paid more than $3 million from 2014–2023 to informants tied to those groups. “ From your evidence

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist The indictment alleges SPLC used paid confidential sources inside extremist groups, including some in leadership roles, and used shell companies to protect operations. SPLC says those tactics were part of monitoring violent groups, not supporting them.

@TrumpHair_ @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Also quick question. How is the head of an organization an informant? And if they are just informants then why did the splc also provide paid for rides to and from events as well as the money to publicize the event? And why would they create fake companies to pay them?

@alanssnackbar34 @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist Cool, so you m know exactly where it says it… show me.. put your money where your mouth is. Because I bet it says the word “paid informant” I’ll wait

@TrumpHair_ @MarcusOwens87 @theobjectivist You obviously didnt read the indictment and are talking out of your ass. It 100% does and if you read it you would know that but your cult leaders said it didn’t so you gotta follow along.