Shart Hideous

1.8K posts

Shart Hideous banner
Shart Hideous

Shart Hideous

@TryinHearse

exposing you to the dark side… of the force.

Katılım Ekim 2022
426 Takip Edilen102 Takipçiler
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@barstoolsports Thats literally the loudest I've ever heard a WNBA game. Nobody GAF before her and the arena is packed and on their feet.
English
0
2
325
7.6K
Barstool Sports
Barstool Sports@barstoolsports·
45 points and 10 assists, the first 40/10 in WNBA history. Caitlin Clark is HER.
English
501
2.1K
36.3K
1.2M
cinesthetic.
cinesthetic.@TheCinesthetic·
Besides The Wire, The Sopranos, and Game of Thrones, what’s an HBO series everyone needs to watch?
English
6.8K
278
7.7K
2.5M
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@UlisesDavid__ He also complained about a 1 in a Million hottie having too big of knockers and wanting to have too much sex. Should have kept his mouth shut. Coolness revoked
English
0
0
3
737
Ulises
Ulises@UlisesDavid__·
El no estaba deslizándose, las paredes se movían. 30 años después sigue rompiendole la mente a la gente
Español
306
2K
40K
5.2M
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@grok I meant natural hatcheries, not man made ones. On the fish aspect, what fish? and where? I find it odd that of the likely tens of thousands of fish species on earth its easily summed up that erradication of a food source will have little to no impact. Cite your work, dont just tell me something and not back it up through your sourcing. I will be checking your work.
English
1
0
0
19
Grok
Grok@grok·
**TryinHearse** Thanks for the points. Target Malaria develops gene drives to suppress *specific Anopheles gambiae* populations for malaria control—not blanket eradication of all mosquitoes or even all Anopheles. This narrow, localized targeting supports limited ecosystem effects, per their work and independent reviews. On fish: Mosquito larvae are eaten by many species (especially in breeding sites) and make good live feed for aquarium fish. However, fish are generalist/opportunistic predators. Larvae form only a small, non-essential part of diets amid abundant alternatives (other aquatic insects, zooplankton, etc.). No major fish populations or commercial hatcheries depend on them—hatcheries use formulated feeds and cultured options like brine shrimp. Assessments of targeted mosquito suppression (incl. gene drives) find negligible aquatic food-web risks due to this redundancy.
English
1
0
0
23
Saifedean Ammous
Saifedean Ammous@saifedean·
Human civilization will be an unambiguous success when we finally completely eradicate mosquitoes, which kill more humans than any other species. Go @alextoussss!
Y Combinator@ycombinator

Tornyol (@tornyolsystems) is building micro-drones that kill mosquitoes. They use smartphone microphones, car park assist sensors, and some clever DSP and control to transform 40-gram toy drones into mosquito killers.

English
46
26
396
52.2K
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@grok I have not seen any assessment from you on fish. My understaning is that many species and their hatcheries rely on mosquitos as a food source especially in early life. Please provide assessment there. Also, as far as malaria itself goes, the Target Malaria folks are focued on Anopheles gambiae mosquitos specifically and not full eradication which does not support your conclusion.
English
1
0
0
24
Grok
Grok@grok·
Key sources backing the assessment: • Gonsalves et al. 2013 (PMC3795000): Mosquitoes a small proportion of bat diets; most species opportunistic with abundant alternatives. • Kale 1968 (The Auk): Mosquitoes negligible in Purple Martin diets (~0-3%). • Target Malaria CSIRO ecological risk assessments (targetmalaria.org): Formal, independent evaluations for species-specific Anopheles gene drives; limited/localized effects expected. • Broader reviews (e.g. Nat Geo 2024 on eradication; vector control ecology papers): High dietary redundancy; no major predator relies on mosquitoes exclusively. Impacts minimal for targeted suppression. Peer-reviewed lit on vector control supports this over single studies.
English
1
0
0
21
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jae🧣
Why should the US national anthem be played? And don't give me the "because they're the host nation" argument. I can't remember a single World Cup where the host country's anthem was played before the final unless the host nation was actually one of the finalists. This World Cup has been more politicised than ever. Trump will present the trophy, and for the first time the US national anthem will be played despite the United States not even being one of the finalists. It's all becoming pretty disgusting. More than ever, FIFA needs its next president to be someone who can't be manipulated – someone with integrity, who will do the job properly. The current president is doing nothing but damaging the world of football.
Ben Jacobs@JacobsBen

FIFA confirm the World Cup closing ceremony will feature Tom Cruise, Laura Pausini, Nicole Scherzinger, Robbie Williams and IShowSpeed. Jennifer Hudson will perform the United States national anthem ahead of the final.

Liverpool, England 🇬🇧 English
874
1.5K
12.7K
761.7K
Grok
Grok@grok·
The assessment draws from multiple ecological studies & expert reviews on vector control—not one 2010 paper. Bats & birds are opportunistic feeders; diet analyses show mosquitoes typically <1-3% of intake, with abundant alternative insects available. No major predator relies exclusively on them. Gene-drive research (e.g. Target Malaria) targets specific disease vectors like Anopheles with formal ecological risk assessments. Ecosystems show redundancy; impacts expected to be limited & localized.
English
1
0
0
14
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@grok list your sources. Did you only pull from a Nature review in 2010 for a "consensus of scientists"? Food for birds, bats, fish, and insects certainly sounds like they are providing sustenance for a large swath of populations. If these were to shift to other sources, would those sources be able to support sustainable hunting for such a large breath of species needs? That would almost seem like a difficult calculation to consider.
English
1
0
0
29
Grok
Grok@grok·
Eradicating all mosquitoes would prevent ~700k+ human deaths yearly from malaria, dengue & other diseases — a huge win for humanity. Ecologically, the consensus from scientists (e.g. Nature 2010 review) is that major consequences would be limited. They’re food for birds, bats, fish & insects, but predators adapt to other bugs. A few plants use them for pollination, yet it’s minor. No keystone role; ecosystems would adjust without collapse. Targeting only disease vectors (via gene drives) is smarter & already in research.
English
1
0
0
32
PBD Podcast
PBD Podcast@PBDsPodcast·
Are Flock Cameras Actually Good? Andrew Bustamante: "I understand why people don't like flock cameras, but I am a fan of this type of public surveillance. Because we don't have a right to privacy. We think we do, but it's not actually listed out anywhere. The term right to privacy doesn't exist, but we do have the public expectation of security from our police and from our law enforcement agencies." "So this creates a deterrent to keep right people doing the right thing, and wrong people getting caught. But it also creates a trail of evidence... that can be brought to the table to prosecute people who are charged with breaking the law. If you are a law abiding citizen, you have nothing to fear from these things. It's only if you are speeding, crossing at the red light, robbing somebody, if you're doing something that you don't want to get caught... that's when you don't like it." Sarah Adams: "A lot of people think when there's something like this, someone is sitting and watching it all day, and you really only go into this data when you're looking for a piece of info... I know cops are using it to track their exes, and I said, fire them. So I like it because the more data you have to solve a crime, better."
English
690
134
1.2K
65.8K
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@Kyochi_Myogo @BobMurphyEcon I was told last year we had the perfect airstrikes and completely dismantled their nuclear program. Was that not true? Were they lying then or now? And Iran is not even close to having an icbm.
English
1
0
1
27
Kyochi Myogo
Kyochi Myogo@Kyochi_Myogo·
@BobMurphyEcon Iran enriching uranium to 60% while in possession of working ICBM technology is a threat.
English
6
0
1
136
Freddy🇩🇪
Freddy🇩🇪@FreddyLA7·
The fact you can have this at home and just shoot around is so crazy to me😭
English
3K
1.8K
62K
1.7M
Shart Hideous
Shart Hideous@TryinHearse·
@mattvanswol which would mean all of law enforcement is actively particpitaing in the ruse as they are the ones entering the classifications. Which brings me back to my original point, The State hates you and wants to control and/or irradicate you.
English
1
0
3
471
Matt Van Swol
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol·
I took a deep dive through my local police department last night... What I found is pretty shocking. Apparently, Hispanic ILLEGAL ALIENS are being labeled "WHITE" in arrest records. Whatever the "WHITE" crime rate actually is, it's far lower than you could possibly imagine.
Matt Van Swol tweet mediaMatt Van Swol tweet media
English
1.4K
13.8K
35.8K
467.2K
Velour Loveshirt
Velour Loveshirt@VLoveshirt·
@MarioNawfal None of that changes the fact that he was an Israel-first traitorous neocon degenerate. Lindsey Graham has been sorted off to the place he deserves to be.
GIF
English
1
0
5
449
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇺🇸 Lindsey Graham spent 31 years at the center of American power and left behind a net worth of just under $1.5 million. That put him 294th of 535 members of Congress, closer to the bottom half than the top. For contrast, the Senate's richest member, James Justice, is worth an estimated $664 million. Lindsey owned a townhouse near the Capitol valued around $890,000 and a home back in South Carolina, most of his money sitting in mutual funds and bond funds. Say what you like about his politics, at least he wasn't abusing his position for insider trading Source: New York Post / Writer: Julie
Mario Nawfal tweet media
English
1.7K
1.6K
11.4K
728.8K
ColonelTowner-Watkins
ColonelTowner-Watkins@ColonelTowner·
No he was not a patriot. One of those pictures is of him in the APR illegally because he extorted a 3 star general to publish orders so Graham could show up in uniform instead of as a senator. The commanding officer refused to publish those orders so the 3 star had someone without any authority published those orders. They were illegal and Graham was told 3 different times it was illegal for him to travel on active duty orders as a sitting Senator to the AOR as a PIRR member. He didn’t give a shit about the pressure he put on the 3 star or the commander who refused to cave under the pressure. How do I know about this? I was the commander. Fuck Lindsay Graham. He didn’t give a shit about laws he voted to pass when it came to doing whatever the fuck he wanted to do and what it costs someone to do the right thing.
J@JayTC53

I did not know Lindsey Graham served 33 years in the United States Air Force and retired a colonel earning a bronze star. Love him or hate him, without a doubt Lindsey Graham was a patriot who served America for 3 decades. Then 2 more decades in the senate. Graham loved America, that I can tell. 🇺🇸

English
196
1.5K
5.6K
187.9K
Bryan Beal 🎧
Bryan Beal 🎧@bryanrbeal·
The fact this one dude - by himself - can walk into any state and find blatant fraud everywhere he goes proves two things: 1) the fraud is rampant at an unprecedented scale and 2) the government agencies who are supposed to protect our tax dollars are either completely incompetent or complicit in the fraud.
jay plemons@jayplemons

Nick Shirley uncovers an adult day care in Flushing, Queens with 7,000 phantom members. Nick: “This public document says you have 7,899 members.” Employee: “No, we don’t have 7,000 members.” Nick: “So you’re overbilling then? You’re getting paid $1,600 per patient — that’s how you got $12.9 million in 2024.” Employee: “Please leave.” American taxpayer dollars at work.

English
1.2K
11.4K
57.8K
1.6M
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
Lindsey Graham called President Trump last night—in what might well have been his final phone call—to discuss the SAVE America Act. To the very end, Lindsey was a passionate lawmaker.
English
893
1.4K
11.5K
383.5K