Tsevan Rabtan

Periodista japonés: “¿Por qué no nos avisaron antes de atacar Irán?” Trump: “¿Por qué no nos avisasteis sobre Pearl Harbor?”

El 90% de los artículos políticamente relevantes en ciencias sociales se sitúa a la izquierda del espectro ideológico (1960–2024). En este paper se han analiza 600.000 abstracts de 11 disciplinas con clasificación por LLMs. Todas las disciplinas se situaron a la izquierda del centro todos los años del periodo. Las más escoradas (estudios de género, estudios étnicos, antropología) son además las más uniformes ideológicamente: cuanto más a la izquierda, menos pluralismo interno. Y el dato que me parece clave: el desplazamiento a la izquierda desde 1990 no se explica porque los académicos cambien de opinión, sino porque los los que entran ya llegan más a la izquierda (autoselección ocupacional pura). Economía es la disciplina menos sesgada (5,7/10), pero incluso ahí solo el 16% de los trabajos se sitúa en el centro-derecha.

1/4. Hoy ha llegado a mis manos un libro jurídico publicado en una "editorial de prestigio" española en el que se citan reiteradamente varias publicaciones que realmente no existen.

As an avid reader of Immanuel Kant during my teenage years, I disciplined myself morally in ways that external chaos could never achieve. Kant’s categorical imperative became my inner compass: act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. This pure reason-based ethics grounded me, turning personal turmoil into a commitment to principles that transcend circumstances. The loss of Ali Larijani, a true Kantian thinker who authored multiple works on Kant’s philosophy, including explorations of mathematical method, metaphysics, and synthetic a priori judgments in his thought, feels profoundly personal to me. Here was a man who confronted what he saw as a materialist, genocidal empire on high moral ground, much like Kant’s insistence on treating humanity always as an end in itself, never merely as a means. His death is not just a political event; it is a blow to that rare fusion of philosophical rigor and principled action. The United States, through its Rewards for Justice program, placed a bounty of up to $10 million on Larijani’s head (along with other senior Iranian officials, including Mojtaba Khamenei) just days before his reported killing in an Israeli strike. This act reduces a human being, regardless of political role, to a price tag, a means to an end in geopolitical maneuvering. If this practice were to become a universal principle, no head of state would ever be safe again. Imagine Donald Trump, or any leader, subject to the same logic: bounties issued by adversaries, turning political opposition into licensed assassination markets. The world would descend into a state where dignity evaporates, reason is subordinated to power, and perpetual insecurity reigns, precisely the antithesis of Kant’s vision of a kingdom of ends, where rational beings coexist under laws they give themselves. Larijani, this committed Kantian (Syed Kantian, as some might say), left a piercing question for the Muslim world in his final public message before his martyrdom: Which side are you on? He framed the confrontation as one between America/Israel on one side and Muslim Iran/forces of resistance on the other, urging Islamic nations to unite rather than remain silent or complicit. He emphasized that true security, progress, and independence come not from narrow nationalism but from solidarity across the Ummah, echoing a bloc-like unity similar to the European Union. Today’s EU stands, in many ways, on Kant’s anti-nationalist philosophy. Kant viewed nationalism as outdated, a relic of particularism that must yield to cosmopolitan right and perpetual peace through federations of free states. Larijani, in his last message, similarly rejected narrow nationalism for Iran or the Muslim world, advocating instead for a collective strength akin to a supranational bloc that could guarantee dignity and autonomy for all, much like Kant’s ideal of a federation transcending sovereign rivalries. I am in no position to write a full obituary for him yet; the shock is still too raw, the grief too immediate. But I will write one, in time. For now, this is simply an acknowledgment: a Kantian light has dimmed, yet the imperative he lived by, and that he helped instill in me, remains undimmed. We must will a world where such principles prevail, not bounties and eliminations.

Lo de que repentinamente cambie el juez y aparezca otro que automáticamente archive una instrucción de seis años, es tan obsceno que no lo vi venir.

Lo hicieron con Gaza y como nadie les paró lo repiten con Cuba dejándoles sin energía. Esto después de décadas de bloqueo. De Cuba quieren el turismo y acabar con una reserva moral de la humanidad. Cuba ha sido siempre solidaria, demostremos ahora que Cuba no está sola.