Josh

4.7K posts

Josh banner
Josh

Josh

@UAPJosh

Let’s call this a soft reboot.

Katılım Şubat 2021
122 Takip Edilen390 Takipçiler
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
Years later and I’m still wondering why no one can see that “Jake Barber” is just a hilarious pseudonym. He’s bald, guys! His actual name is Fred Jones and he’s a hell of a mechanic
English
0
1
0
39
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@chrisramsay52 That’s what happens when you make your password Dr. Italo’s birthday
English
0
0
0
135
Chris Ramsay
Chris Ramsay@chrisramsay52·
FYI James Fox’s X account has been compromised: Dear fellow X folks, I wanted to let everyone know that my X account has been compromised — trying to work through it but as of now I have zero control / access so if any messages come from it it’s not me. -James
English
36
68
681
30.8K
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@matthew_pines Instructions unclear, ended up with this guy on the squad
GIF
English
0
0
0
75
Matthew Pines
Matthew Pines@matthew_pines·
If your group chat doesn’t have at least one frontier lab researcher, an autistic intelligence officer, a Buddhist Tier 1 NOC, a gonzo journalist, a terminally online anon, a conspiracy YouTuber, a physicist in deep AI psychosis, a Senate staffer, & an NSC official, you’re ngmi.
English
52
22
405
25.2K
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@matthew_pines If you only knew what I do about those accounts it would blow your mind…. 🤔
English
0
0
0
5
Matthew Pines
Matthew Pines@matthew_pines·
Thinking about becoming one of those aesthetic cryptic vibe posting accounts…
Matthew Pines tweet mediaMatthew Pines tweet mediaMatthew Pines tweet mediaMatthew Pines tweet media
English
51
13
348
72.1K
Josh retweetledi
Matthew
Matthew@SunOfAbramelin·
A campaign for UAP amnesty is taking shape before the public has been told what crimes occurred, who committed them, why they were committed, or what any proposed deal would forgive. That order must be reversed.
English
13
36
292
6.5K
Josh retweetledi
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Yeah…nah. Here’s what I think is happening instead. I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim: The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight. The U.S. hides bioweapons programs. The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs. We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent. We run drugs. The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice. Putin easily kills people outside Russia. We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work. U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases. We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level. There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs Etc. ———— The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence. Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong. After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims. I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim. A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing. A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.” Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is. We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.
Michael Shermer@michaelshermer

Re conspiracy theories already surfacing that Lindsey Graham was murdered by Russians, here is SuperGrok's latest info on his cause of death. "Aortic dissection due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease" not a poison-tipped dart, plutonium trace, etc. x.com/i/grok/share/f…

English
486
923
6.3K
560.7K
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@holland_tom Yes but have you heard that UFOs are real
English
0
0
0
25
Tom Holland
Tom Holland@holland_tom·
Very happy to say it again. The Odyssey is an amazing film, and missing out on seeing it because you think it’s woke or whatever is cutting off your nose to spite your face. Your loss.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

@kevinnbass Tom Holland is such a cuck

English
5.8K
8.2K
199.8K
13.6M
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
Never forget this exchange between @LueElizondo and an audience member in an interview with Richard Dolan….from May 20th, 2021. (Full credit to @TheUfoJoe for the transcript). @rosscoulthart
Josh tweet media
English
0
1
2
55
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@ufouapam Hard not to be skeptical that he’s delivering this news right as talk about his alleged legacy program involvement picks up
English
0
0
1
211
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@wow36932525 @LueElizondo This is interesting, but also a touch convenient that Lue is the one delivering this info right as the heat is turning up regarding his alleged legacy program involvement. 🤔
English
0
0
0
279
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@TheDylanBorland “Then start askin’ the right fuckin’ questions.”
English
0
0
1
25
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
For not being able to talk about crash retrievals and bodies, there sure are a lot of DOPSR-approved whistleblowers who talk about crash retrievals and bodies. #ufotwitter
English
0
0
1
70
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@why_here_again @LueElizondo Do we know this for sure? You’re jogging my memory a bit on that but I can’t recall who said that or when.
English
1
0
0
11
WhyAmIHereAgain
WhyAmIHereAgain@why_here_again·
@UAPJosh @LueElizondo He would have been the Security Manager (the guy who makes sure people have proper clearances for the program) had the SAP been approved. It wasn't, and he never had any official role for AAWSAP or AATIP.
English
1
0
0
19
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
One thing no one can refute is that @LueElizondo was listed by Harry Reid on the “bigot” list on the SAP application for AAWSAP. Hal Putoff recently said Lue was tangential to AAWSAP, but not in the official program. So how did he find himself on Reid’s list? #ufotwitter
English
1
0
0
65
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
@TheUfoJoe Jacques Vallee mentions in Forbidden Science 6 that Semivan also declined a briefing on NHI after his and his wife’s experience because he didn’t want to become more entangled with the phenomenon.
English
0
0
1
25
Joe Murgia
Joe Murgia@TheUfoJoe·
Davis: Jim Semivan was briefed on the crash retrieval programs at a superficial, top level. He was invited to get the more detailed, technical-information-level, full-monty briefing but he turned it down because he felt he would be of no use to them because he was not a technical guy. Me: Take the briefing!
GIF
English
9
2
51
4.6K
Josh
Josh@UAPJosh·
The thing is, the list of names of people to talk to has been right under our noses. These are the folks Harry Reid had on the bigot list on his AAWSAP SAP application. @RepLuna @EricBurlison
Josh tweet media
English
0
0
1
22