@Taluien @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Yeah I'll let you live in the world a world where only selfish people will remain
And what will you write on the graves of the kind people you love and who tried to save everyone ?
English
UnPouletFrite
5.7K posts
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia I'll write "Hopeful Naivety did not survive running headfirst into cruel reality and shattered without any impact" on your gravestone.
English
Reds believe "Well, if everyone pushed Red, we'd all be fine. Why wouldn't you pick Red?" Whereas Blues believe, "Someone else will pick Blue. So, in order to ensure everyone lives, we have to pick Blue." One option kills people. One option does not. It's simple. Pick Blue.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@Taluien @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia It can be 50% or 60%, we just don't know, but the most the most altruistic and kind people will surely vote blue, so I prefer trying to save them than to increase the chances of killing them
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia If everyone who thinks like you is included in the 40%, you are still dead.
And you have thrown your life away for nothing. You achieved nothing but adding your name to the death tally. Hence it being not a moral choice to make.
English
@Taluien @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia You prefer let them die, and not trying to save them, it's your choice, and I don't want live in a world with only people like u, so i'm gonna stay on blue
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Then I would've been dead too if I pushed the blue button. And I would condemn the people who thought that the long shot of 50%+1 for blue was a risk worth taking. I'd be sad. But I'd be alive to be sad. They on the other hand? Simply dead.
English
@Taluien @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia This is if I'm the only one to think like this, you saw it's not the case :)
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia This would lead to 40%+1 dead. Nothing gained. More death. Immoral choice to make.
English
@BigBoss45th @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia When it will be your 2 childrens, your wife and your parents i don't know if you'll say the same thing, or if you'll regret not having tried to save them
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Yeah that’s their own fault for picking it lmao. It’s really not that hard to understand. You people have a weird complex about saving lives
English
@BigBoss45th @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia 0% chance of dying but 30%/40% of people will die
There will inevitably be at least 30% of voters who support the blue party, you won't change that by voting red, you'll just let them die
English
@rodney112038122 @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Considering that at least 30% of people will choose blue, would you rather condemn them to save yourself than try to save them?
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Yes. They would indeed be suicidal idiots. They are presented with a risk free option but choose to gamble their lives anyway? That's fully on them
English
@HoodiKarmea @keir_92 @BigBoss45th @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia When 40% of your loved one will die will you talk like this about them ?
English
@keir_92 @BigBoss45th @UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia So we go blue to save the people too stupid to go red?
English
@QruisS @dweebzilla @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia At least 30% of the population will choose blue out of fear of losing loved ones; by choosing red you condemn all these people (including 30% of your loved ones).
English
@dweebzilla @UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia And it only takes 1 more people from blue to doubt last second and choose red to condemn everyone.
Red is safe regardless of number.
Blue is conditional.
Blue is the dangerous one.
English
@QruisS @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia It's impossible to know if they'll vote red; you're just dreaming that it will happen, but in reality, many will probably vote blue, wanting to save you or someone else. You'll lose 40% of your loved ones; I'm not sure you'll be saying the same thing afterward.
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia I know for a fact that the few people I still have in my life would press red because one's life comes first above all else in a survival situation.
And even if they did press blue, theres not much left to do but mourn for them and move on.
English
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Why would you press the blue button when it literally puts your life at risk.
English
@QruisS @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Pick red and YOU will survive
This won't be the case for many people who are dear to you
English
@UnPouletFrite @FfcGolden @XenoTrivia The condition of people dying is IN the blue button to begin with.
Red is safe, Blue is risk.
It doesnt matter if vote is simultaneous or not, whoever chooses (assuming nothing is left to luck) blue is an suicidal at worst, and stupidly naive at best.
English
@Izzy__ACE @Creditspreadit Yes but it only needs less than 50% press red to save everyone so it's easier than you think
English
@Creditspreadit There are 8 billion people on earth. someone is bound to press red, by accident or on purpose.
English
Now correct me if I'm wrong it's been a while since I heard this thought expirement
If everyone pushed red. Everyone will live. Right?
So the logical decision is to push red assuming everyone else will. Because at least some one will push red so might as well we all do to live
𝘽𝘼𝙄𝙇𝙀𝙔 𝙄𝙉𝘿𝙐𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙄𝘼𝙇 𝙂𝙍𝙊𝙐𝙋@Creditspreadit
@MrBeast Everyone is framing blue as the suicide button when red is the murder button.
English
@FfcGolden @XenoTrivia Imagine you press the red button and 40% of the population press the blue button and die (it's totally possible), are you going to say that those 40% are suicidal idiots? Even if they are your parents? Your children? Your friends ?
English
@XenoTrivia "one option kills people" yea blue kills you
red doesn't
you literally just made the argument for red
English
@DavSebP @BenFerber Some people prefer to save their loved ones rather than rely on 100% of people pressing the red button (which will never happen), so pressing the red button will kill all these people who just want to ensure the survival of those they love.
English
@BenFerber It is only kill half the planet because half the planet is somehow choosing the Suicide-Gamble option that creates the possibility of death in the first place because they see some complex dilemma where there literally isn't one unless they choose to create it.
English
antisocial freaks on here keep trying to re-run this poll to get their preferred "kill half the planet" choice to win, and it won't. something they can't grasp is that most people would rather be dead than inhabit a world solely filled with selfish freaks like them
English
UnPouletFrite retweetledi
no it's more like everyone is tied to the track, if you press the red button you untie yourself and nobody else, but if 50% of the people on the track press the blue button everyone is untied? not the same but closer i think - it matches the collective help thing
Rock Solid@ShitpostRock2
Dumbest fucking hypothetical ever posted
English
UnPouletFrite retweetledi
FILS EN DEMI-FINALES 🔥
Arthur Fils prend sa revanche contre Jiri Lehecka et atteint la deuxième demi-finale de sa carrière en Masters 1000. 👏
Il devient le PREMIER joueur français à atteindre ce stade à Madrid depuis l’arrivée du tournoi sur terre battue en 2009. 🇫🇷
Français
UnPouletFrite retweetledi
UnPouletFrite retweetledi
Les Lebrun ne battent pas les Chinois ?
Petite séance de rattrapage en moins de deux minutes :
i_tweet@i_Tweet7
Français