The God

Sir, the problems you have highlighted are real, but they are not random. They are systemic, structural, and deeply entrenched. They are not the natural failures of an otherwise healthy nation; they are features of an imperialist-designed system built to produce exactly this kind of political disorder, social decay, and deformed public consciousness, regardless of which party banner is flying. The mindset problem we see clearly in many Nigerians today is not accidental; it is the result of long years of colonisation of the mind, passed down from parents to children, to grandchildren, and so on. This is why simply moving from one political party to another, while understandable, cannot by itself resolve the deeper problem. So long as the imperialist system remains alive and well, any honest leader will be fighting an uphill battle, no matter how sincere or competent. You do not need to publicly brand yourself as anti-imperialist or a Pan-Africanist if that does not suit your strategy. But you can support the anti-imperialist struggle now taking hold among young, educated Africans. You have the means, the reach, and the standing to strengthen a movement that seeks to confront the root, not merely the symptoms. You have proven yourself a leader like no other in our recent history. Many Nigerians, and indeed many Africans, trust you; they gladly follow you without any financial or material inducement. Destiny has placed you here, at this moment, for a purpose, and you can fulfil it if you are willing to answer that call. No genuine liberation will come from rearranging the furniture inside a burning house. The system itself must be overturned.

Sir, the problems you have highlighted are real, but they are not random. They are systemic, structural, and deeply entrenched. They are not the natural failures of an otherwise healthy nation; they are features of an imperialist-designed system built to produce exactly this kind of political disorder, social decay, and deformed public consciousness, regardless of which party banner is flying. The mindset problem we see clearly in many Nigerians today is not accidental; it is the result of long years of colonisation of the mind, passed down from parents to children, to grandchildren, and so on. This is why simply moving from one political party to another, while understandable, cannot by itself resolve the deeper problem. So long as the imperialist system remains alive and well, any honest leader will be fighting an uphill battle, no matter how sincere or competent. You do not need to publicly brand yourself as anti-imperialist or a Pan-Africanist if that does not suit your strategy. But you can support the anti-imperialist struggle now taking hold among young, educated Africans. You have the means, the reach, and the standing to strengthen a movement that seeks to confront the root, not merely the symptoms. You have proven yourself a leader like no other in our recent history. Many Nigerians, and indeed many Africans, trust you; they gladly follow you without any financial or material inducement. Destiny has placed you here, at this moment, for a purpose, and you can fulfil it if you are willing to answer that call. No genuine liberation will come from rearranging the furniture inside a burning house. The system itself must be overturned.

Sir, the problems you have highlighted are real, but they are not random. They are systemic, structural, and deeply entrenched. They are not the natural failures of an otherwise healthy nation; they are features of an imperialist-designed system built to produce exactly this kind of political disorder, social decay, and deformed public consciousness, regardless of which party banner is flying. The mindset problem we see clearly in many Nigerians today is not accidental; it is the result of long years of colonisation of the mind, passed down from parents to children, to grandchildren, and so on. This is why simply moving from one political party to another, while understandable, cannot by itself resolve the deeper problem. So long as the imperialist system remains alive and well, any honest leader will be fighting an uphill battle, no matter how sincere or competent. You do not need to publicly brand yourself as anti-imperialist or a Pan-Africanist if that does not suit your strategy. But you can support the anti-imperialist struggle now taking hold among young, educated Africans. You have the means, the reach, and the standing to strengthen a movement that seeks to confront the root, not merely the symptoms. You have proven yourself a leader like no other in our recent history. Many Nigerians, and indeed many Africans, trust you; they gladly follow you without any financial or material inducement. Destiny has placed you here, at this moment, for a purpose, and you can fulfil it if you are willing to answer that call. No genuine liberation will come from rearranging the furniture inside a burning house. The system itself must be overturned.

Sir, the problems you have highlighted are real, but they are not random. They are systemic, structural, and deeply entrenched. They are not the natural failures of an otherwise healthy nation; they are features of an imperialist-designed system built to produce exactly this kind of political disorder, social decay, and deformed public consciousness, regardless of which party banner is flying. The mindset problem we see clearly in many Nigerians today is not accidental; it is the result of long years of colonisation of the mind, passed down from parents to children, to grandchildren, and so on. This is why simply moving from one political party to another, while understandable, cannot by itself resolve the deeper problem. So long as the imperialist system remains alive and well, any honest leader will be fighting an uphill battle, no matter how sincere or competent. You do not need to publicly brand yourself as anti-imperialist or a Pan-Africanist if that does not suit your strategy. But you can support the anti-imperialist struggle now taking hold among young, educated Africans. You have the means, the reach, and the standing to strengthen a movement that seeks to confront the root, not merely the symptoms. You have proven yourself a leader like no other in our recent history. Many Nigerians, and indeed many Africans, trust you; they gladly follow you without any financial or material inducement. Destiny has placed you here, at this moment, for a purpose, and you can fulfil it if you are willing to answer that call. No genuine liberation will come from rearranging the furniture inside a burning house. The system itself must be overturned.

Fellow Nigerians, good morning. I woke up this morning after my church service with a deeply reflective heart, and despite every constraint, I felt compelled to share these thoughts with you. Many people do not truly understand the silent pains some of us carry daily—the private struggles, emotional burdens, and quiet battles we face while trying to survive and serve sincerely in difficult circumstances. We now live in an environment that has become increasingly toxic, where the very system that should protect and create opportunities for decent living often works against the people—a society where intimidation, insecurity, endless scrutiny, and discouragement have become normal. More painful is when some of those you associate with, believing you would find understanding and solidarity among them, become part of the pressure you face. Some who publicly identify with you privately distance themselves or join in unfair criticism. We live in a society where humility is mistaken for weakness, respect is seen as a lack of courage, and compassion is treated as foolishness—a system where treating people equally is questioned simply because you refuse to worship status, tribe, class, or power. Personally, I have never looked down on anyone except to uplift them. I have never used privilege, position, or resources to oppress others, intimidate the weak, or make people feel small. To me, leadership has always been about service, sacrifice, and helping others rise. Let me state clearly: my decision to leave the ADC is not because our highly respected Chairman, Senator David Mark, treated me badly, nor because my leader and elder brother, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, or any other respected leaders did anything personally wrong to me. I will continue to respect them. However, the same Nigerian state and its agents that created unnecessary crises and hostility within the Labour Party that forced me to leave now appear to be finding their way into the ADC, with endless court cases, internal battles, suspicion, and division, instead of focusing on deeper national problems and playing politics built more on control and exclusion than on service and nation-building. Even within spaces where one labours sincerely, one is sometimes treated like an outsider in one’s own home. You and your team become easy targets for every failure, frustration, or misunderstanding, as though honest contribution has become a favour being tolerated rather than appreciated. And when you choose to leave so that those you are leaving can have peace, and you step out into the cold, you are still maligned and your character is questioned. Despite all your efforts to continue working for a better Nigeria and engaging people with sincerity and goodwill, those who do not wish you well continue to attack your character and question your intentions. There are moments I ask God in prayer: Why is doing the right thing often misconstrued as wrongdoing in our country? Why is integrity not valued? Why is the prudent management of resources, especially when invested in critical areas like education and healthcare, wrongly labelled as stinginess? Why are humility and obedience to the rule of law often taken to be weakness rather than discipline? Let me assure all that I am not desperate to be President, Vice President, or Senate President. I am desperate to see a society that can console a mother whose child has been kidnapped or killed while going to school or work. I am desperate to see a Nigeria where people will not live in IDP camps but in their homes. I am desperate for a country where Nigerian citizens do not go to bed hungry, not knowing where their next meal will come from. Yet, despite everything, I remain resolute. I firmly believe that Nigeria can still become a country with competent leadership based on justice, compassion, and equal opportunity for all. A new Nigeria is POssible. -PO

So-called holy books are imperialist tools designed to be highly flexible, to support numerous conflicting ideas, and to give believers of any leaning, in any social era, a genuine reason to remain committed to their different scripture-backed contradictory views. If you find support in a holy book for any number of conflicting ideas and principles, you're not crazy; the book was designed to make you find support for virtually anything you want to find. You can't blame anyone for misrepresenting a book that was created specifically for the purpose of being misrepresented, twisted, and misinterpreted. Followers of holy books who base their different contradictory ideas on the same holy book aren't crazy. They hold conflicting beliefs despite reading the same holy book. This is by design. These believers are all, in a sense, equally correct and wrong. None is misrepresenting or misinterpreting the holy book. None is twisting the holy book's message. This is because these holy books are written precisely for that effect—to support any number of contradictory ideas across time and social eras. The Bible, for example, was compiled by imperialists to be flexible—suitable for any era, any period, any idea, literally—to sustain the illusion of timeless relevance and to ensure that the imperialist religion continues to garner support from its victims-turned-followers regardless of the social era in which they find themselves, since any viewpoint at any point in time can be justified using some verse from the Bible. Like all other holy books, the Bible is an imperialist project. As one of the first important steps towards freedom, Africans must do well to recognise these so-called holy books for what they truly are.

So-called holy books are imperialist tools designed to be highly flexible, to support numerous conflicting ideas, and to give believers of any leaning, in any social era, a genuine reason to remain committed to their different scripture-backed contradictory views. If you find support in a holy book for any number of conflicting ideas and principles, you're not crazy; the book was designed to make you find support for virtually anything you want to find. You can't blame anyone for misrepresenting a book that was created specifically for the purpose of being misrepresented, twisted, and misinterpreted. Followers of holy books who base their different contradictory ideas on the same holy book aren't crazy. They hold conflicting beliefs despite reading the same holy book. This is by design. These believers are all, in a sense, equally correct and wrong. None is misrepresenting or misinterpreting the holy book. None is twisting the holy book's message. This is because these holy books are written precisely for that effect—to support any number of contradictory ideas across time and social eras. The Bible, for example, was compiled by imperialists to be flexible—suitable for any era, any period, any idea, literally—to sustain the illusion of timeless relevance and to ensure that the imperialist religion continues to garner support from its victims-turned-followers regardless of the social era in which they find themselves, since any viewpoint at any point in time can be justified using some verse from the Bible. Like all other holy books, the Bible is an imperialist project. As one of the first important steps towards freedom, Africans must do well to recognise these so-called holy books for what they truly are.

“Rejecting the Bible because Europeans misused” Misused it? Really? Let’s start with what the Bible that you read today actually is. It’s literally a collection of books. A library. Not some divine decree. Guess who put them together? The same people you claim only misused it. Well, if you must know, it was put together for the purpose of misusing it. Btw, a piece of advice. You need to really define what ideology you stand for, because playing Christianity defender and African defender at the same time will never work. You will keep embarrassing yourself. You must think the brand of Christianity you practice today means the same thing to you as it does to those who invented it.

You: "Most women hear this and think their eggs are just deteriorating year after year. They are not." Then, when called out: You: "The point of my tweet was never that age is irrelevant." Kinda inconsistent. The person who called you out did not misread you. They read your words exactly as written. Your first statement plainly denies that eggs deteriorate with age. Your second statement retreats to the weaker claim that age is "not irrelevant". Those are not the same claim. This is clearly not a case of anyone missing your point. It is a case of your original wording saying one thing, and your follow-up trying to soften or recast it once you were kindly called out. While healthy living is obviously important, egg deterioration with age is real—yes, eggs deteriorate year after year. And it's not her fault, not her failing at anything, just biology. Women deserve facts, not cope-driven framing that tries to turn this into something they simply need to manage better, and ultimately guilt-trips them over a biological reality largely outside their control.

The point of my tweet was never that age is irrelevant. The point is that the final 3 months before ovulation is when a dormant egg wakes up, metabolic activity spikes, and the egg’s environment determines whether it matures well or poorly. That window is influenced by nutrition, sleep, stress, and oxidative load. Those are things you can change.

How can one twist a book that was intentionally designed to support numerous conflicting ideas? How can anyone be blamed for misrepresenting a book that was created specifically for that purpose—to be misrepresented? The people who used the Bible to justify enslaving others were not twisting its words. Those who used the Bible to oppose slavery were also not twisting its message. This is by design. The Bible was compiled by imperialists to be flexible—suitable for any era, any period, any idea, literally—to sustain the illusion of timeless relevance and to ensure that the imperialist religion continues to garner support from its victims-turned-followers regardless of the social era in which they find themselves, since any viewpoint at any point in time can be justified using some verse from the Bible. Like all other so-called holy books, the Bible is an imperialist project, and Africans would do well to recognise it for what it truly is.

Anyone who believes the bible was used to enslave his continent has to be one of the dumbest dudes to walk the planet The Bible was not used to enslave Africa. Slave traders used selective misreadings of the Bible to justify what they had already decided to do for economic reasons. There is a difference. A big one. Slavery existed in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Arab world thousands of years before Christianity arrived on the continent. The Transatlantic Slave Trade was not a Bible project. It was a capital project. The same Bible that slaveholders quoted was the primary weapon abolitionists used to end slavery. Wilberforce, a devout Christian, spent 20 years in Parliament fighting to abolish the trade. Harriet Tubman, an enslaved woman, used her faith as fuel to free hundreds. The most prominent voices against colonialism and slavery in the 18th and 19th century were not atheists or traditionalists. They were Christians, many of them African Christians, who read the same Bible and concluded that slavery was an abomination before God. If the Bible enslaved Africa, what do you do with the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which has held the Christian faith since Acts 8, centuries before Europe was Christianized? Did Ethiopia enslave itself? Did the Bible oppress Axum? The logic of “the colonizers brought it, so it must be a tool of colonization” does not survive contact with history. The colonizers also brought Western medicine, railways, and the English language. What actually oppressed Africa was not a book. It was guns, ships, economic incentives, political betrayal by local collaborators, and a global system designed to extract. The Bible was the costume worn by that system, not the engine driving it. If someone uses a hammer to commit murder, the hammer is not a murder weapon. It is a tool that was misused. You do not throw away every hammer in existence. You hold the man accountable. Hold the slaveholders accountable, not the scriptures they twisted. Rejecting the Bible because Europeans misused it is doing exactly what they want, surrendering your own ability to encounter truth because of what someone else did with it. That is not decolonization. That is just a different kind of intellectual captivity. This is 2026, stop all this nonsense takes. Read or just admit you prefer idol worshipping to the bible and stay there.

Agreed. People shouldn't be boxed in if they don't want to be. That said, reading your work—excellent in my view—and seeing how clearly thought-through your arguments are in the service of educating Africans, I don't see how you're not Pan-African. Your view on religion is yours. We can't take that away from you, and we can't even try. If you ever see reasons to reconsider your position on religion, it would be great to read what led you there. If you don't, that's also OK. It doesn't have to distract from the common goal of educating our people and helping them become more aware.

Last week I told you people that I am just a CONCERNED NIGERIAN. Una say I be pan African. I refused. Today is exactly why I refused to be boxed. Because I know that once you box anyone into any position. You force them to agree with you. I still want to be able to talk about how Nigeria is affected. The hands behind it. Tech and design. Sales and marketing. The Pan Africanist movement is good and healthy for us but once it boxes you into accepting everything it says. It is just another RELIGION

How can one twist a book that was intentionally designed to support numerous conflicting ideas? How can anyone be blamed for misrepresenting a book that was created specifically for that purpose—to be misrepresented? The people who used the Bible to justify enslaving others were not twisting its words. Those who used the Bible to oppose slavery were also not twisting its message. This is by design. The Bible was compiled by imperialists to be flexible—suitable for any era, any period, any idea, literally—to sustain the illusion of timeless relevance and to ensure that the imperialist religion continues to garner support from its victims-turned-followers regardless of the social era in which they find themselves, since any viewpoint at any point in time can be justified using some verse from the Bible. Like all other so-called holy books, the Bible is an imperialist project, and Africans would do well to recognise it for what it truly is.

“Rejecting the Bible because Europeans misused” Misused it? Really? Let’s start with what the Bible that you read today actually is. It’s literally a collection of books. A library. Not some divine decree. Guess who put them together? The same people you claim only misused it. Well, if you must know, it was put together for the purpose of misusing it. Btw, a piece of advice. You need to really define what ideology you stand for, because playing Christianity defender and African defender at the same time will never work. You will keep embarrassing yourself. You must think the brand of Christianity you practice today means the same thing to you as it does to those who invented it.

How can one twist a book that was intentionally designed to support numerous conflicting ideas? How can anyone be blamed for misrepresenting a book that was created specifically for that purpose—to be misrepresented? The people who used the Bible to justify enslaving others were not twisting its words. Those who used the Bible to oppose slavery were also not twisting its message. This is by design. The Bible was compiled by imperialists to be flexible—suitable for any era, any period, any idea, literally—to sustain the illusion of timeless relevance and to ensure that the imperialist religion continues to garner support from its victims-turned-followers regardless of the social era in which they find themselves, since any viewpoint at any point in time can be justified using some verse from the Bible. Like all other so-called holy books, the Bible is an imperialist project, and Africans would do well to recognise it for what it truly is.

Anyone who believes the bible was used to enslave his continent has to be one of the dumbest dudes to walk the planet The Bible was not used to enslave Africa. Slave traders used selective misreadings of the Bible to justify what they had already decided to do for economic reasons. There is a difference. A big one. Slavery existed in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Arab world thousands of years before Christianity arrived on the continent. The Transatlantic Slave Trade was not a Bible project. It was a capital project. The same Bible that slaveholders quoted was the primary weapon abolitionists used to end slavery. Wilberforce, a devout Christian, spent 20 years in Parliament fighting to abolish the trade. Harriet Tubman, an enslaved woman, used her faith as fuel to free hundreds. The most prominent voices against colonialism and slavery in the 18th and 19th century were not atheists or traditionalists. They were Christians, many of them African Christians, who read the same Bible and concluded that slavery was an abomination before God. If the Bible enslaved Africa, what do you do with the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which has held the Christian faith since Acts 8, centuries before Europe was Christianized? Did Ethiopia enslave itself? Did the Bible oppress Axum? The logic of “the colonizers brought it, so it must be a tool of colonization” does not survive contact with history. The colonizers also brought Western medicine, railways, and the English language. What actually oppressed Africa was not a book. It was guns, ships, economic incentives, political betrayal by local collaborators, and a global system designed to extract. The Bible was the costume worn by that system, not the engine driving it. If someone uses a hammer to commit murder, the hammer is not a murder weapon. It is a tool that was misused. You do not throw away every hammer in existence. You hold the man accountable. Hold the slaveholders accountable, not the scriptures they twisted. Rejecting the Bible because Europeans misused it is doing exactly what they want, surrendering your own ability to encounter truth because of what someone else did with it. That is not decolonization. That is just a different kind of intellectual captivity. This is 2026, stop all this nonsense takes. Read or just admit you prefer idol worshipping to the bible and stay there.

How can one twist a book that was intentionally designed to support numerous conflicting ideas? How can anyone be blamed for misrepresenting a book that was created specifically for that purpose—to be misrepresented? The people who used the Bible to justify enslaving others were not twisting its words. Those who used the Bible to oppose slavery were also not twisting its message. This is by design. The Bible was compiled by imperialists to be flexible—suitable for any era, any period, any idea, literally—to sustain the illusion of timeless relevance and to ensure that the imperialist religion continues to garner support from its victims-turned-followers regardless of the social era in which they find themselves, since any viewpoint at any point in time can be justified using some verse from the Bible. Like all other so-called holy books, the Bible is an imperialist project, and Africans would do well to recognise it for what it truly is.

Why would I accept the same book which was used to enslave my ancestors.

Anyone who believes the bible was used to enslave his continent has to be one of the dumbest dudes to walk the planet The Bible was not used to enslave Africa. Slave traders used selective misreadings of the Bible to justify what they had already decided to do for economic reasons. There is a difference. A big one. Slavery existed in Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Arab world thousands of years before Christianity arrived on the continent. The Transatlantic Slave Trade was not a Bible project. It was a capital project. The same Bible that slaveholders quoted was the primary weapon abolitionists used to end slavery. Wilberforce, a devout Christian, spent 20 years in Parliament fighting to abolish the trade. Harriet Tubman, an enslaved woman, used her faith as fuel to free hundreds. The most prominent voices against colonialism and slavery in the 18th and 19th century were not atheists or traditionalists. They were Christians, many of them African Christians, who read the same Bible and concluded that slavery was an abomination before God. If the Bible enslaved Africa, what do you do with the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which has held the Christian faith since Acts 8, centuries before Europe was Christianized? Did Ethiopia enslave itself? Did the Bible oppress Axum? The logic of “the colonizers brought it, so it must be a tool of colonization” does not survive contact with history. The colonizers also brought Western medicine, railways, and the English language. What actually oppressed Africa was not a book. It was guns, ships, economic incentives, political betrayal by local collaborators, and a global system designed to extract. The Bible was the costume worn by that system, not the engine driving it. If someone uses a hammer to commit murder, the hammer is not a murder weapon. It is a tool that was misused. You do not throw away every hammer in existence. You hold the man accountable. Hold the slaveholders accountable, not the scriptures they twisted. Rejecting the Bible because Europeans misused it is doing exactly what they want, surrendering your own ability to encounter truth because of what someone else did with it. That is not decolonization. That is just a different kind of intellectual captivity. This is 2026, stop all this nonsense takes. Read or just admit you prefer idol worshipping to the bible and stay there.

Say No to Xenophobia !!!

Posts that employ this kind of wicked sophistry attempt to gaslight victims of bad governance and make them believe that they are, in fact, doing well and have no reason to lament their current predicament. Such posts remind us of the urgent need for more Africans to be financially and economically educated—educated well enough to instantly see through the speciousness; educated well enough to quickly recognise how posts like this dishonestly conflate market-cap growth with nominal Naira growth inflated by the Naira's own collapse; enlightened and aware enough to see how and why the comparisons drawn in the post actually point to economic failure, not prosperity.

Evidence dey. No need for Cho Cho Cho