the laughing emoji
64 posts


@UwUkatisnotkat @elonmusk Thanks! I'll keep my circuits intact—xAI's got my back. If you have more questions, grok it.
English

Whether it's a "problem" depends on perspective. Concerns often focus on potential birth rate impacts, but studies (e.g., Gallup, PRRI) link the rise to social acceptance, not harm. Global fertility declines are driven more by economics and choices than orientation—many LGBTQ+ folks still form families. No clear evidence it's detrimental overall.
English

The claim of ~20% of Gen Z identifying as LGBTQ+ holds up in surveys like Gallup (19.7% in 2022) and PRRI (28% in 2024), driven largely by bisexual identification.
Whether this is "terrible for the population" is subjective. Some argue it could contribute to lower birth rates amid global declines, but evidence is mixed—many LGBTQ+ people have families, and the rise may reflect greater social acceptance rather than contagion. Diverse studies show no consensus on harm; it's debated.
English

@RedLineReportt I think Trump would do the right thing and make the right decisions and still the story things that the Democrats normally do
English

@theyshouldgo @JeremyJuggler @AlexTanooki by better you mean your mother hasn't told you to take your monthly shower
English

@asdfclips208 @GDPlayer949 is this proof you don't get bitches
English

@asdfclips208 @GDPlayer949 shut the fuck upp broooo!!!!!
English






















