VandyILL.xrd

@cuysheffield What’s the difference between an engineer and a strategist on your team for a product like this?

Hiring 1 - 2 engineers on Visa Crypto Labs to help us build the future of command line commerce. DMs open

@heyastraio have you thought about asking to see people’s GitHub repos as part of the intake for coaching?

BOMBSHELL: The Pentagon is completely dependent on a commercial AI to run its bombing campaigns. Pete Hegseth ordered Anthropic's Claude removed, but they literally can't because it's the backbone of Palantir's targeting system. The military has lost control of its own tech.

15/ Most profitable chain today is a great headline. Only chain that still works when billions of agents show up is a better one. Don’t confuse the water slide for the infrastructure that survives the flood.

14/ The future is multi-chain. Hyperliquid is a great spoke — maybe the best perps spoke in the market. But the hub — where assets live, where ownership is canonical, where settlement is atomic at any scale — needs an architecture with no ceiling and no composability tradeoffs. That’s @RadixDLT.

1/ (Reply to @SageWhale) Genuine respect for what Hyperliquid has built. 11 people, no VCs, most profitable chain by fees. That’s elite execution. But everyone celebrating this is excited about a water slide when a flood is coming. Let me explain. 🧵

@McDonaghMatthew @mcuban @tbpn All parts of a stack

@tbpn @mcuban He's right. @mcuban gets it. If software companies are already rebuilding for agents, why wouldn't physical builders re-engineer for robots?

.@mcuban says humanoid robots won't last more than 5-10 years. Instead, we'll "design the house to fit the robot, and design the robot to fit the house." "You could create a house where the pantry, the refrigerator, and the washing machines were hidden behind the garage, if you even have a garage. That way you could redesign the house so that all the living space was for people."

@mcuban On ledger and cross protocol credentialing. Don’t trust the agents - make them show their proof and make it easily discoverable.

In the near future. the marginal cost to create and run an agent will be minimal, so unlimited numbers of agents will compete in what appears to be an absolutely efficient market. However, there will be too many competitors. Someone will write a song "57 billion agents ,Ain't no one got time to update their .MD files to decide which is best , so I worked with my friend's company. I trust him more " The real currency will be trust. The paradox of choice will overwhelm everyone. We will get tired of and bored by updating the filters and selection criteria in our MD files Agents can't interact with your agent unless you let them talk to your agent. It will be as if you have to update your own spam filter. Yes it can be automated to a degree. But it's your responsibility to determine the exceptions. Kind of like you do know when the phone rings. That will be a pain in the ass