Requiem Vanguard ⚰️ 🎵| ENVtuber

Top win rate champions by role 📊

"Charity." The 'game' you're playing at is creating a "VTuber Charity" - not a VTuber agency. Agencies need to generate profit - enough that everyone gets paid (including the CEO). If the agency doesn't make money, it stops running because it can't fund talent supports and/or the CEO gets sick of burning their own money. There is a reason that agencies that take "0% from talents" also have a 0% survival rate past 2-3 years. Historically, agencies have taken around 3+ years to become profitable. Luminara has existed for just shy of 1. If you're already tired of "the game" then perhaps you may have picked the wrong one. If your goal is to create a "VTuber Charity" then that's fine, even admirable. Just don't call your venture an "agency" - that gives everyone the wrong idea. Tweeting this out as a CEO is also a baffling decision. Tweeting out that your "agency" made net zero in its first six months is a rather unconventional way of disclosing what most agencies would regard as confidential (but predictable) information. Tweeting out that you, as the CEO, "do not love the game anymore" is inexplicable. Everyone needs to vent sometimes. Everyone feels overwhelmed sometimes. When you're a CEO, you do not get to be "everyone." We need more serious businessmen and businesswomen as CEOs - not people starting ventures out of ego and/or some misguided attempt at proving an overly idealistic point about the industry. If you want to audition for an "agency", check to see if its CEO/staff have any socials. Vet those socials extensively. Check to see if the CEO or marketing material contains any grandiose statements about the 'state of the industry' - or really anything other than a plan to make content/money. If you see any of that, think twice. You never know your new CEO will fall out of love with "the game" just six months into their tenure - and you'll want to have an exit plan in case that happens.

⭐️Reasons to NOT become my friend! ⭐️ 🦋 I'm clingy 🦋 I have anxiety attachment 🦋 I'm chronically online so I text back really fast 🦋 I flirt a lot 🦋 I'll always ask you to voice call 🦋 I'm too straightforward sometimes 🦋 I'm a gacha addict 🦋 I play league of legends

【悲報】中の人がかなり大きいと噂される人気VTuber・さくらみこさん、手元配信で手を映すも両手を使わずにBGMを止める魔法を使う タイムラグにしては長く、映した手元は別人なのではと話題になっている。 真相は闇の中。 #さくらみこ #手元配信

今のVtuber界隈

Quel jungler pourrait aller parfaitement avec Garen, Lux, Vayne et Jarvan 4 selon vous ? 🤔

This upset a lot of people. "If you ban my champion I'm going to troll!" If you're willing to throw the game over not being able to play 1 champion, you would have found a reason to throw anyways because you're a manchild. "Wouldn't you rather them play their OTP?" Learn a new champion, one that is useful. This is Ranked. "Then I'll just ban your champion too!" That's okay, it's your Ban vote. Spend it how you like. "Why not just let people play what they want to!" The same reason we don't let toddlers eat icecream for every meal. It's not good for them. "Why do YOU get to decide if they can play their champ?" Because I get 1 Ban vote, just like everyone else. Every other hero/champ-based competitive game allows you to ban champions even if your teammates want to play them. That's part of being a competitive game. Sometimes there's a 70% winrate champ and the enemy has first pick -- you shouldn't be disallowed from removing it from the game just because L9MISTERFISTER wants to play it and might waste 40 of his own minutes if he doesn't get to. The problem is that we've bent over backwards trying to appease the whims and temper tantrums of emotionally stunted League losers. You should be able to ban your teammate's hover.

Riot PLEASE bring back banning your teammate's hovered champion 🙏 Having the game knowledge to ban out worthless champs your team hovers (like Master Yi, Ezreal, etc.) is literally a SKILL. Bring this feature BACK 😭🙏