Vanitas

@OrphanRed6 @ZaphodTheFourth @Theflateartherz @got2b_kidding @FlatEarthDoc @Rick_Dubagner @PlantBasedComic @whoopsbuni @SueMeBro42 @gcsescience9 @jeranism @ParisUsa333 @ItsFlatFolks @YouTube Well it's nice that you know this, because all high altitude balloon footage we know of shows a curved horizon when it's in the center of the frame, meaning when it's undistorted.

@ZaphodTheFourth @Theflateartherz @got2b_kidding @FlatEarthDoc @Rick_Dubagner @PlantBasedComic @whoopsbuni @SueMeBro42 @gcsescience9 @jeranism @ParisUsa333 @ItsFlatFolks @YouTube Horizontal lines in the center of the image appear horizontal. H-lines above center = ball-like. H-lines below center = bowl-like.

@SemperAnticus2 @whoopsbuni @planeawakening @NASA One observer in South America and another in South Africa can see the exact same stars south of them at the same time when it's night for both of them at the same time.

@hahabecky A planet kind of needs an atmosphere to have weather. Mars and Pluto for example don't have that.

not to be flat earth levels of stupid but ... do other planets just not have any weather whatsoever?? coz every nasa pic of earth is unclear due to clouds but pluto??? jupiter?? mars? clear as fuck my friends. i’m not saying nasa are liars, but nasa are liars

@MaxisicalG @AnthonyBenton7 If it actually was a fisheye lens then the concorde would be curved. But it isn't.

@AnthonyBenton7 You can keep being deceived by fish-eye-lens effect your whole life, every pilot, & even your astronomers and all those that claim to debunk FlatEarth have come forward to say there is no curvature to see in the horizon, even at airliner altitudes! STOP MAKING A FOOL OF YOURSELF!

Few things to accept from one picture; *Horizon is Flat(Perspective created) *Level is Flat *No gravity-conforming water surface *No Curvature *NO IDEA how flatness can be sustained over 4.5 billion years(if Helio...) *No need to trust pseudoscience over proven facts #EarthIsFlat

@milehigh_native @ParisUsa333 @GarethBattersby @UncleAl91 @NASA Why does everyone always assume we haven't already researched flat earth? We have, to no avail. It doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

@ParisUsa333 @GarethBattersby @UncleAl91 @NASA 18 billion is small...especially to send people to the moon. And theres no economic or military advantage to the mission. Research flat earth, just don't do it on Youtube.

On our next trip to the Moon, we will take it a step beyond leaving our footprints behind. We will establish a long-term presence on the Moon and eventually, across the solar system. Details: go.nasa.gov/2HDq8i4.

@officiallypc @jdodson5791 @FlatEarthRT Damn those are some awful pictures. No wonder you doubt they're planets when all your photography skills allow you to produce is a brown smush

@jdodson5791 @FlatEarthRT We can only look at the evidence #FlatEarth

@Flat_E_Prophet @Gr8Believer Flat earth goes directly against empirical science? Well said. Just shows how irrational of a belief it is.

@Gr8Believer Flat Earth is very easy to prove, because it goes directly against empirical science! The thing that I don’t understand, is why do the most adherent Christians go against Flat Earth so vehemently? Flat, Stationary Earth confirms the Bible? That boggles my mind

When I told my friend about #FlatEarth he thought I was crazy. Then I explained it 2 him now HIS friends think he is crazy.Thats how we roll

@FlatEarthersWW @AlienLiam7 When answering the same question to Elon Musk, the flat earth org said that it's because the moon and mars have been observed to be round. Which they are. Do you not agree with this?

So, Why isnt there a Flat Moon or Flat Mars Society?

@central_plane @jeremy16180 So if you've seen the evidence, then how did you ever come to accept flat earth? When you can easily see the curve it's hard to think it's flat, that's denying what your own eyes are seeing.

@jeremy16180 I'm sure I would be disappointed. Trust me, I've seen your "evidence"; I tried to disprove the Flat Earth myself initially.

THE OLD GRAVITY IN THE TAILPIPE TRICK: When you're asked to explain your understanding of why the Earth is flat to someone who asked you, only to have them smugly throw gravity in your face as if it was the ONLY THING YOU DIDN'T THINK OF.

@OrphanRed6 @got2b_kidding @FlatEarthDoc @Rick_Dubagner @PlantBasedComic @Theflateartherz @whoopsbuni @SueMeBro42 @gcsescience9 @jeranism @ParisUsa333 @ItsFlatFolks @YouTube Well it's fitting then that all high altitude balloons clearly show a curve when the horizon is going through the center of the frame, meaning when the horizon is undistorted. I wonder why?

@got2b_kidding @FlatEarthDoc @Rick_Dubagner @PlantBasedComic @Theflateartherz @whoopsbuni @SueMeBro42 @gcsescience9 @jeranism @ParisUsa333 @ItsFlatFolks @YouTube When u look at high-alt baloon footage for info about Earth's shape, slow it down & look carefully at frames where horizon/curve is below center of image. See Earth appear concave because wide-angle lens distortions. Same distortion makes it look ball-like when above center.

@BamaDan78 @GeraldMostyn Ah well, its not like it hasnt happened before

@CryptootpyrC @simpleljh Why look into it when something as simple as a sunset debunks it?

@simpleljh Not trying to convince you but look into the flat earth theory and then tell me about your opinion.

@GeraldMostyn Heres the curve without fisheye lens, you're welcome

@MaxisicalG @NYJetsFan74 @TyraelXBL @NASA @NASA_TESS Okay, so completely throwing away any globe earth belief, can you explain to me how it is possible on our flat earth for the angle of polaris to always be equal to the latitude of the observer?

@NYJetsFan74 @TyraelXBL @NASA @NASA_TESS Again, notice this argument is d same taught to us, to reinforce a rejection of d real FE, I can't help you if you're not ready 2 keep aside the sphereearth beliefs, & look critically at a FE model, that shows Heavenly bodies, close by & smaller than earth. So how many have life?

Once launched on Monday, @NASA_TESS will collect 27GB of data per day searching the sky for planets orbiting stars, the equivalent of ~6,500 song files beaming down to Earth every 2 weeks. This music of the stars, however, will need a bit of fine-tuning: go.nasa.gov/2IRkqGs

@DKinATL @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS So I repeat, you still claim NASA admits all their images are CGI, give me proof of this. Your reference to Mr Blue Marble does not support your claim in the slightest.

@Vanitistic @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS Please try and comprehend what I post. Nowhere did I say that one reference is proof they fake all images of space and our world. I said NASA openly admits every image is CGI. His was just one example...

We're on a mission to find thousands of new planets orbiting nearby stars. 🌟🌟🌟 During a two-year survey, @NASA_TESS will study 85 percent of the sky, looking for signs of planets ranging from Earth-size to larger than Jupiter. Watch to learn more:

@DKinATL @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS Nowhere did you say that? Then what about your quote just 2 tweets ago: "What about the interview with "Mr. Blue Marble" where he admits over and over the images they release are photoshop" Notice the term "the images"? That refers to multiple if not ALL images, not one.

@DKinATL @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS They admit one image is photoshopped. That's it. Not entirely fake, just edited. And it's only one image.

@BamaDan78 @Vanitistic @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS They admit their images are fake. Not me...

@DKinATL @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS So if you know this why did you claim this quote was referencing all NASA photos? Sounds more like you just now looked this up that we're talking about it, because you're paraphrasing NASA's article on it pretty accurately.

@Vanitistic @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS I know the image. He said he took strips of data to create an image that he thought would represent our world. He admits he's not an astronaut so he has to use his imagination and "basically, hit command Z a lot." The guy is even more fooled than you. All others are CGI too.

@DKinATL @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS Well then perhaps open your eyes, go to the video, and look at the small box below the video called a "description", because he explains what camera and lens was used to get this footage.

@Vanitistic @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS I know who Jeranism is, buddy... What I don't know is what camera / lens combo supposedly took this photo. Still looking for actual proof of any measurable curvature.

@DKinATL @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS Yes, I have been, but I can see that you haven't, because then you would know that that infamous quote was actually said only in reference one specific composite image that he put together, and that had gaps that he had to fill using photoshop. All others are real.

@Vanitistic @BamaDan78 @BryanSpaulding @NASA @NASA_TESS Have you ever been on their website? What about the interview with "Mr. Blue Marble" where he admits over and over the images they release are "Photoshop, but, it, it has to be..."