Vengeance 🦇

@bitcoinjack you never aim for 100% but 90-95 % would be perfect - true. I dont know what you mean by pour concrete to your own wells but its normal in this job - depends on target = it doesnt always mean that you are closing / abandon well

@VengeanceBTC 80% is not 100% Also allowing to pour concrete in your own wells is a great idea no?

So proud of the EU for not having stocked up their reserves last winter

@alistairmilne Nah, seems ok to me but ye at first sight looks suspicious. At 30 sec ok for me too

@thesaint_ alts depression 99% sure most of them and some propably after that deepest dip

Gm Chads. What stage of the market are we currently on now?

@GarrettBullish There were times when every rocket and misslie was bullish for btc. Good old times

geopolitics → macro → crypto key indicators now: oil, DXY, UST 2Y/10Y we are still in the range but it's a typical time to stay cautious

@hubofintel x.com/i/status/20277…

This looks like shrapnel/debris damage rather than a direct missile impact could be a drone too but I don’t suspect any direct ballistic impact

@0xUnihax0r Between 1980-2025 is like X2 in productivity and like -10-20% less work hours per year. Not bad not terrible

@VengeanceBTC Almost no progress in the last 50 years despite massive gains in productivity. And extended on 100 years, social struggles explains the positive gain better than tech advancement.

You see, dude goes to China, gets oneshotted by a robotics show and his first reaction when he comes back is to tell his citizens they need to work more and forget the work life balance Isn't it paradoxale? Tell me more about how automation will make people work less please

@edwardmorra_btc We are risky assets

How does one fucking country bombing another country impact dEcEnTrALiZeD cryptocurrencies so much? I understand we’re all connected but what does POPCAT have to do with it?

Tldr. What's a reason in your opinion why You are sitting in prison right now? Do you feel innocent?

@devchart Too many of them to just "show of force". Gigantic cost of this operation and all for political pressure? I doubt it tbh but we gonna find out pretty soon

Either Trump wants to do a show of force to pressure Iran for the negotiations or we are finally about to have the big war with Iran pretty soon... x.com/vcdgf555/statu…

$rei will be worth billions one day, even after -95% dives. Believe in something

This video should unsettle anyone who takes the United States seriously as a nation. Because it exposes something dangerous: the trivialization of the world's most consequential office. It shows how carelessly the power, credibility, and accumulated moral authority of a superpower can be squandered for a few seconds of viral attention. In any other major democracy, this behavior from a head of state would trigger a constitutional crisis. Paris would burn. Berlin would convene emergency sessions. In the Nordic countries, resignation would follow within hours. Across functioning democracies, the public, institutions, and political class would recognize this for what it is: an assault on the dignity of the state itself. Leaders are not free to perform as entertainers without consequence. National honor is not personal property, it's held in trust. But the United States is not just another country with a provocateur in charge. It is the linchpin of global order. It maintains formal alliances and security guarantees with forty to fifty nations. It underwrites the financial architecture, trade systems, and diplomatic frameworks that billions of people depend on daily. When the American president speaks—or posts—it doesn't land as satire, meme, or personal whim. It reads as a signal about what the country is becoming. American power has never relied solely on carrier strike groups or economic output. It has rested on something more fragile and more valuable: trust. The belief that beneath domestic turbulence lies institutional seriousness, predictability, and a baseline commitment to dignity. That belief is now disintegrating in real time. Millions of American companies operate globally. They negotiate multibillion-dollar contracts in environments where reputation is currency. Boardrooms in Frankfurt, Singapore, and Dubai aren't debating whether a post was clever—they're asking whether the United States remains a reliable partner. Whether agreements signed today will be honored tomorrow. Whether American leadership has devolved from institutional to purely theatrical. Consider tourism, which sustains millions of American jobs—airlines, hotels, restaurants, museums, entire regional economies. Soft power isn't an abstraction. It materializes in flight bookings, conference locations, study-abroad programs, and decades of accumulated goodwill. A quiet, decentralized boycott doesn't require government action—only a collective sense that a nation no longer respects itself. Now picture this image being studied by foreign ministers, central bank governors, defense strategists, and sovereign wealth fund managers. Picture them asking a coldly rational question: How do we write binding thirty-year agreements with a country whose public face will be this, relentlessly, for years to come? How do we plan for the long term when the tone is impulsive, mocking, and unbound by the gravity of office? This is where the real calculus begins. Trillions in foreign capital depend on confidence that America is stable, credible, and rule-governed. That confidence is now being traded for what, exactly? Applause from an online mob? A dopamine rush from manufactured outrage? Content designed to dominate the news cycle rather than serve the national interest? Every serious nation eventually confronts this choice: burn long-term credibility for short-term spectacle, or safeguard the reputation previous generations bled to build. The United States spent eighty years constructing an image of reliability, restraint, and leadership under pressure. That image wasn't born from perfection—it came from a visible commitment to standards that transcended impulse. This isn't a partisan issue. Europeans who value democratic norms recognize something ominously familiar here. Americans—Democrat and Republican alike—who believe in responsibility and restraint should see it too. Power attracts scrutiny. Leadership demands discipline. A superpower cannot behave like a reality TV contestant without paying a price. The presidency is not a personal broadcast channel. It's a symbol carried on behalf of 330 million people and countless international partners who never voted but whose lives are shaped by American decisions anyway. Every post either reinforces or erodes the idea that America can be counted on when it matters most. So the question is no longer whether this is offensive. The question is whether this is who America chooses to be: a nation that trades a century of hard-won reputation for viral moments. A country that replaces statecraft with content creation. A republic governed like a season of reality television. History offers a harsh lesson here. Great powers don't fall because enemies mock them. They collapse when they begin mocking themselves—publicly, proudly, and without grasping the cost until it's far too late. Stay connected, Follow Gandalv @Microinteracti1

@onderyazici You cant read huh

@VengeanceBTC still bullish, no panic needed

$btc daily chart. Whats next? Imo we are still in bull trend until close below green. Close below means for me that we are entering bear market for btc and end of it should be around 70-80k. For now, we are holding and there is no reason to panic. #crypto #bitcoin

@imCryptoGoku Send it ser

@No_man_one I propably betting for eth outperform and maybe some pumps windows for alts. Game changed. Everything is possible right now imo

@VengeanceBTC Imo either we got a good Q1 with a potential decent exit or we’re on the way to down only for a while

It’s going to be bad

@No_man_one Yeah, true

@VengeanceBTC Totally. Just keeping it in mind because so many signs in addition: like commodities craziness for example

Bitcoin recap for 2025 - LOTR edition