Vi 🔑 SuperFans

Snap a photo of your phone with a position open on the new dynamic terminal and include the phrase “LP anytime, anywhere” and tag @meteoraag for a chance to win. Rules: -Photos must be real (no AI-generated images) -The image must clearly show an active Meteora position on your phone. (PC not included) -Submissions must be safe and legal -One submission per person -No duplicates or existing images can be reused -Winners selected by a Meteora judging panel based on creativity and originality Competition ends Tuesday, 7 April at 1 PM UTC. Winners will be judged and selected within a reasonable period thereafter. Get started now: meteora.ag/?utm_source=me…

The LP Anytime, Anywhere Challenge is LIVE Post a photo on 𝕏 with a position on the new dynamic terminal in a unique location from your phone for a chance to win 1 of 5 $500 USDC bounties. Full rules and details below.

@MeteoraAG LP Anytime, Anywhere ☄️ LP 24/7 ❤️🔥🔥🔥 @MeteoraAG

MEXC Has Violated the Law - TWW Formal Response on “Arbitration” and Threats of Doxxing @MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh I’m issuing a formal objection to MEXC’s claim of a “third-party arbitration process” and their associated threat to publicly disclose (“doxx”) my identity. Your own Terms of Service (Section 48) state that “the arbitration shall be subject to the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules in force when the Notice of Arbitration is submitted.” No such Notice of Arbitration has ever been delivered to me. I learned of this so-called process only through your press release - not through the procedures required under HKIAC. That alone makes any claimed arbitration invalid. The HKIAC Rules require impartiality and formal notice of the tribunal’s composition. I have received neither. Until I do, I reserve full rights to challenge any arbitrator and the legitimacy of this process in its entirety. You have also already breached HKIAC Article 45.1, which states: “No party may publish, disclose or communicate any information relating to the arbitration.” By publicly announcing alleged arbitration you’ve violated the confidentiality that governs your own chosen forum. Your Privacy Policy further promises: “We never disclose any personal information about our customers to non-affiliated third parties, except as described below.” Threatening to doxx me violates both HKIAC confidentiality and your own privacy commitments. Even if you argue arbitration hasn’t formally begun, that only worsens your position - in that case, your press release misrepresents a legal process that does not yet exist. I now demand that you immediately provide a copy of any Notice of Arbitration you claim to have filed or intend to file, including the date, the arbitral institution, the seat, the names of any arbitrator, and the claims being made. I further demand that you confirm whether you intend to disclose my identity or personal information, and on what legal basis. All public or private threats of disclosure must cease immediately. Proceed only under full HKIAC compliance - or withdraw this fabricated “arbitration” entirely. I reserve all rights to challenge this process, including any attempt to shape public narrative or disclose private data. If you continue acting outside your own Terms and the HKIAC Rules, I will treat it as bad-faith conduct and pursue every available remedy, including injunctive relief and regulatory complaint. I did not agree to “arbitration by press release.” Follow your own contract, follow your own rules, and stop the coercive theater. MEXC’s public statement goes even further off the rails by characterizing my assets as “illicit profits.” That language is both procedurally improper and legally reckless. Under Article 45.1 of the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules, no party may “publish, disclose or communicate any information relating to the arbitration.” Publicly asserting that a counterparty’s funds are illicit before any tribunal has been constituted is a direct violation of that rule. It prejudges the outcome, poisons the process, and undermines the very impartiality HKIAC is meant to protect. It is also defamatory under Hong Kong law. The Defamation Ordinance (Cap. 21) defines libel as a published statement that damages a person’s reputation by imputing criminal or dishonest conduct. By publicly labeling my transactions “illicit,” MEXC has published an accusation of criminality without adjudicated fact, while simultaneously disclosing my financial data. This constitutes both defamation and breach of contractual confidentiality. Any legitimate dispute resolution body would treat such conduct as bad faith and grounds for sanction. TLDR: If you're going to bring it, bring it. But you're already in violation of the very process you seek to invoke. You'll have a counter-claim from me faster than you can say "stolen funds". -TWW mexc.co/announcements/…

Attention @MEXC_Official - Hold My Beer You claim my crime was automation. Even though I've never had a trading API issued for my account. Your claim to support this is that high frequency trades and some trades (the example you gave was in April, although I found more) executed at the same second. I've explained every trade was manual. I explained and even shown on-chain proof that I make back-to-back DCA orders in rapid succession so that I don't have to stop and calculate the impact to Liq price, instead I just react to the updates on the screen. I've explained VPN usage causing potential lags. And IT security folks in my community pointed out several reasons (that are over my head) on why orders may be legitimately processed on your back end simultaneously even if I didn't send them that way. You claim you can't provide evidence to a third party without doxxing me. (nice veiled threat, btw) But I can. I just exported my entire account history and now share it with the world. I've been in crypto a while, but only started leveraged perps trading this year. I started on MEXC. Now - to my absolute shame and embarrassment - anyone who wants can pour through all of my early trades. My losses. My idiotic moves as I was developing a strategy that went on to make me almost $100M profit just this year. There are plenty of employees in risk control and security researchers on my page. Let everyone take a crack at it and say whether they believe my trade history offers undeniable proof of bot activity based on the frequency and timing of my orders. If frequency and timing do not offer undeniable proof, you must immediately release the $3.1M you're holding hostage so that I can fulfill my promise to give that money away. Your move. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…

An Introduction Since I publicly took on the fight against MEXC, my audience has nearly doubled. To all the new followers - welcome. I encourage you to scroll back and dig through my older posts; there’s plenty of mindset/strategy/trading philosophy there. My purpose on X is simple: to help others. I’m always a student of this space first, constantly learning, constantly sharpening. Crypto is too vast for anyone to know it all - which is why the free exchange of knowledge along the way is - to me at least - such a beautiful thing. No paywalls, just the free-flow of information. For context: I manage close to $100M on-chain and have been fortunate to find real success in this game. That means, unlike most “influencers,” I don’t need to squeeze financial value out of my audience. I’m eligible for monetization, but I won’t be turning it on. If I post about a project, it’s because I believe in it - not because someone cut me a check or I’m trying to pump my own bags. My voice isn’t for sale. When I backed $TUNA, I told my audience before I made my own sizable investment - giving others the chance to front-run me. Most who did made a 3x in a matter of days. I still haven’t sold and don’t plan to for years. That’s just an example of how you can expect me to operate. Authenticity (as one of the scarcest assets in the world) is very important to me. So while half of you may have first met me as the Whale standing up to a corrupt CEX, I hope over the coming weeks you also see me for what I really am: just a guy who loves this space, trying to give back with lessons learned and insights, as we all take this journey together. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

So much of my early crypto journey and subsequent success I owe to the fantastic group over at @RUMSHQ It is so rare in this space to find a person - much less multiple persons who have banded together - who have a true passion for crypto education while at the same time retaining pure motives (not creating a following just to shill you something). Regardless of which streaming platform you choose to catch their content on it’s definitely worth it to integrate them into your daily routine. Because of their integrity and pure dedication to education I have decided and am happy to announce I’ve committed to being a sponsor for their show and all the great work they are doing. Education over profit is what will continue to onboard the masses. It’s why I’ll never have anything to sell you. It’s why I’m proud to financially support @RUMSHQ and hope you find their content as valuable as I have.

We all seem to get this in some areas of life - like social media. If something is free - chances are YOU are the product being sold. But somehow we don’t seem to get this in crypto. I see people picking their centralized exchanges - or even worse - perps protocols based on fee structure. “Such-and-such has no fee trading pairs!” Or “I can’t afford the fees on HyperLiquid!” So they willingly throw themselves to the vultures either not realizing or caring that the cost for the “free” or “discounted” trade is typically a system that is completely rigged against you. Free usually means “come here so our market makers and liquidation engines can rape you”

Remember that thing I told you about when it was only a 10m mcap? That’s now still only 45m? Are you starting to see the vision I saw yet? If it’s done all of this (not even talking about the price action) in 45 days what do you think is going to happen over the next few months? I’m a serial entrepreneur by resume. I’ve built businesses, I’ve acquired businesses. With that background I would like to think I’ve developed a skill of being able to spot winners early. And this? This thing has winner written all over it. It’s ok if you don’t see it. You have to build your own conviction. I’m just some schmuck on the internet. But for those of you who believe? Exciting things be cooking 😃

The poverty mindset infuriates me. It’s bad enough when people sabotage their own success with limiting beliefs and self-imposed ceilings. Fear. Excuses. Mental obstacles that keep them chained to the same life they claim they hate. But the worst part? When those same people try to spread it. When they mock or shame anyone who dares to think bigger, take risks, or break free. It’s not enough for them to stay trapped - they need company in their self-imposed prison. I vehemently reject this mindset. Because every time someone does claw their way out, it proves the chains were never real in the first place. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

Additional $1 Million USDC Bounty To Investigative Journalists Announced I’ve been center stage in the fight against @MEXC_Official 's opaque and predatory practices. But my audience deserves more than to watch me become a single-issue person. There are far bigger battles ahead in crypto - battles about transparency, freedom, and what kind of system we’re building. There's also my firm commitment to educate and enlighten my audience in order to build a stronger, more profitable community. Let me also be clear: the existing $3.1M bounty remains firmly in place. That pledge is permanent. No matter the date, if MEXC ever releases my frozen funds, every cent of that bounty will be paid - because a promise is a promise. But it’s time to pass the torch to the investigative journalists who do this work best. Which is why today, I’m announcing something new: The $1,000,000 Investigative Journalism Award A $1,000,000 award is now live for any journalist or newsroom who can deliver verifiable proof that MEXC is engaged in systemic practices of: Freezing or seizing profitable accounts Weaponizing Terms of Service to confiscate funds from ordinary, legitimate traders Targeting successful traders deliberately This is not about rumor or speculation. It’s about hard evidence: Internal documents Whistleblower testimony Consistent case studies showing a deliberate pattern Proof of consistent misappropriation of customer funds Deadline: 60 days from this announcement. (November 1st, 11:59PM UTC) 🔹 The Committee The bounty will not be decided by me alone. A three-person independent committee will review and judge submissions: I will be one member. Two other respected, and neutral figures will be announced soon. The committee’s ruling will be final. 🔹 Multiple Submissions Rule If multiple independent investigations qualify: First to publish verified evidence receives 60% of the award. Remaining 40% will be prorated among other qualifying investigations, based on significance, and originality. Recycling or plagiarizing/paraphrasing someone else’s work = disqualified. 🔹 Conditions Who Qualifies: Accredited or independent journalists with a history of published work. Established newsrooms (mainstream or crypto-native). Substack/independent writers qualify if they can demonstrate a credible body of prior journalism. Anonymous or pseudonymous investigators may qualify if publication is verifiable and meets the standard of proof. Evidence Quality Bar: Must be verifiable, sourced, and specific. Screenshots alone won’t cut it. Scope of Proof: Must show a systemic pattern of wrongdoing, not isolated mistakes. Publication Requirement: Findings must be publicly published (article, investigative report, exposé). Proof of Origin: First to publish gets priority, but originality and depth matters. Payout Terms: Reward will be paid in USDC within 7 days of committee approval. The committee will make its final determination within 14 days of the 60 day deadline. (which is November 1st, 11:59PM UTC) Security Protections: Journalists and whistleblowers may redact sensitive details; sources may remain protected but must be verifiable. Transparency: Once awarded, the committee will publish a public statement confirming winner(s) and payouts. Journalists may contact the committee via email: mexcexpose@proton.me The Call to Action This award is not about me. It’s about truth. It’s about accountability. And it’s about ensuring that the crypto industry isn’t run from the shadows by unaccountable actors. I'm so convinced of what I know (that @MEXC_Official is engaging in a systematic freezing of profitable accounts / confiscation of funds) that I'm willing to offer $1M to see published proof. If you believe in this cause - tag your favorite independent journalists, crypto newsrooms, and investigative reporters. The torch is theirs now. Let’s see who has the courage to pick it up. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋 @beincrypto @CoinDesk @DecryptMedia @Cointelegraph @crypto @FT @TheBlock__ @Protos @dlnews @MikeBurgersburg

Woah. Put this straight in the category of “I had no idea” This is shocking and something the web3 community should be discussing. I went down a rabbit hole today. In my quest to prove my own innocence. And uncovered a very alarming truth. Web3 loves to call itself “permissionless.” But let’s be honest: private analytics vendors like TRM, Chainalysis, and Elliptic have quietly built the opposite - a shadow credit bureau for your wallet. These companies score and flag addresses the way Equifax scores your credit file. Only worse: You have no right to see your file You have no right to appeal false positives And you can be cut off from DeFi and CeFi entirely without even knowing why Wallets can be blacklisted for: Transacting once with a mixer (even years ago) Routing through a restricted-region IP (that time you switch your VPN to the USA to Netflix but still have your wallet connected) Receiving funds from a counterparty you never controlled (you know how many random tokens people send me just in hopes it will be visible for people tracking my wallet?) Or just being “close” in the transaction graph to something on a sanctions list Once flagged, your address becomes toxic. DeFi protocols hide behind it: “Sorry, our compliance vendor flagged you - nothing we can do.” Meanwhile governments applaud this outsourcing. They get censorship and surveillance, without having to write the code themselves. The result? Web3 with permissioned access. A parallel financial system where your reputation is scored in the shadows by private companies, then enforced by protocols too scared to question them. And unlike credit bureaus, there’s no FCRA or GDPR. No legal process. No requirement to let you see or correct your data. Just a black box deciding whether you belong in “permissionless finance.” If this is the direction we accept, then crypto isn’t an alternative. It’s TradFi with better marketing. Web3 has to decide: do we stand for real openness, or do we quietly accept shadowbans we can’t even see? 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

🚨Bounty Raised to 100% - $3.1M USD🚨 ...as @MEXC_Official Attempts to Gaslight an Entire Community Apparently, I’m a criminal now. That’s the narrative MEXC is floating. According to them, I’m part of some secretive money laundering operation using their platform as a conduit. At least that’s the latest version. Their story keeps changing. First, it was about KYC - even though I completed Advanced KYC long ago. Then it became “high-frequency API trading” - despite the fact I’ve never had API access on the account. Now, the new angle is: Anti-Money Laundering investigation. Because it sounds scarier. And more convenient. Because implying I’m a criminal is their best shot at shaking public backlash. But let’s take a step back and apply some basic logic. If this were a legitimate investigation: Why keep changing your story? Why has no investigator ever contacted me with questions? (I'm not aware of any investigative service in the world who would not jump at the chance to interview their "suspect") Why is the only path forward an in-person meeting - with no formal accusation, no explanation? What exactly do you hope to achieve face-to-face that can’t be done over Zoom? Are you planning to take my fingerprints? My blood? My life? If not, then there’s no excuse. This could have - and should have - been handled virtually. I’ve made it clear: I can prove the source of funds. They’re not interested. They just repeat the same line: “Come meet us. Face to face.” After public backlash mounted to the suggested of in-person KYC, they recently started saying it’s “not compulsory.” But in the same breath, it’s still “the only way to resolve the review.” You can’t have it both ways. To @MEXC_Official : You are not Interpol. You are not MI6. You are not James Bond. You have my KYC. You have my location. Where I live, where I sleep. My IP address. If you believe there’s a crime, forward your evidence to actual law enforcement. What you’re doing instead is freezing user funds while inventing new reasons as you go. You’re not enforcing the rules. You’re making them up as you go. And every trader watching knows it. This was never just about my account - and it’s never been about the money. It’s about standing up to exchanges that operate like the shadowy criminal organizations they falsely accuse their customers of being. Seizing user funds without process, without proof, and without consequence. There are hundreds of stories just like mine - users who never had a voice, never had a following, and never had a chance. That ends here. The bounty has now been increased to 100% of the frozen funds - $3.1 million. Half will go to verified, transparent charities, and the other half will go directly back to the community that continues to amplify this cause. Every last cent will be documented on-chain. Just truth, transparency, and accountability. That is, after all, what crypto is all about. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

It was a pleasure being interviewed by actual journalists in this space - having no idea what the final story would be but happy to be able to speak, regardless

So impressed by my exceptional performance (against your external market makers that provide liquidity to your books) that you freeze my funds. What do you think, should I sign up for the "ask me anything" and ask where my money is? (well, mostly YOUR money at this point) 🤣🤣

🚨 EXPOSE: The Truth Behind MEXC’s “Proof of Reserves” 🚨 Let’s cut through the shiny marketing lingo. MEXC claims to have billions in reserves and “overcollateralized user assets.” But when you peel back the layers, it’s all just numbers they publish themselves - with zero third-party audits, no regulatory oversight, and no transparency into how those numbers are even calculated. Let’s break it down: “Proof” Without Proof MEXC’s so-called “Proof of Reserves” page invites you to compare two numbers: Assets held in on-chain wallets (which they choose and control) Total user liabilities (which only they can see) If assets are greater than liabilities, they call it a win. Sounds legit, right? Except…both numbers come from MEXC directly. There’s no independent auditor, no named accounting firm, no regulatory oversight, and no verification that: Those wallets even belong to MEXC All liabilities are truly accounted for The assets aren’t borrowed, pledged, or otherwise encumbered This is like a casino publishing its own “audit” showing the vault is full, and expecting you to clap for them. Merkle Trees = Fake Accountability To appear transparent, MEXC rolled out a Merkle Tree tool. Great, right? Wrong again. While this lets you confirm your own balance is included, it does nothing to confirm that: Everyone else’s balances are also included The total liabilities are real The reserves actually exist and are accessible Merkle Trees can help detect exclusion. But without an independent auditor, they’re just a technical magic trick that hides the bigger issue: no one is checking their books. Red Flags You Can’t Ignore: No Independent Audit Not Regulated Opaque Reserves User Funds Frozen Without Cause Ask anyone watching my campaign. I’ve been locked out of millions. MEXC demanded an in-person meeting and still refuses to release my funds. What does that say about “1:1 reserves” if you can’t access your own money? So Why Does This Matter? Because you might be next. If an exchange claims to be solvent but refuses a real audit, it’s already failed the test. FTX made similar claims - right up until the charade was too big to hide any longer. MEXC is asking you to trust a black box with a smile on it. That’s not proof. That’s marketing. We demand better. We demand transparency. We demand independent, verifiable audits - not self-published numbers on a screen. Until then, everything they post is just smoke and mirrors. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

MEXC’s Official Statement Is a Masterclass in Saying Nothing Let’s be clear: Instead of addressing the facts, their “statement” leans on copy-paste compliance jargon, implying vague wrongdoing without providing a single detail. That’s not a response - that’s deflection. If I’ve truly violated anything, name it. Quote the exact violation. Prove it. If not publicly, to me directly. But they won’t. Because they can’t. At no point has MEXC made any real effort to communicate the actual issue. Since this whole thing started, the only question they’ve asked me was about API access. I told them what I’ll repeat here: I’ve never set up API trading. Never used a bot. Never granted third-party access. The only API activity on my account likely came from their own mobile app - just like how Hyperliquid’s front-end sends trades to the backend via API. That’s standard. So let’s be clear - this has nothing to do with KYC. I’ve already completed that. This has nothing to do with automation. I’ve never used it. Every trade was manual - my own fingers, my own calls. Full stop. If that’s their big allegation…there isn’t one. The only solution they’ve offered? A bizarre request to meet in person - a requirement that appears nowhere in their terms of service. They froze my funds after I beat their external market makers - fair and square - with nothing but skill and discipline. That’s not a violation. That’s the game. The only thing they’ve exposed… ...is how terrified they are of a trader who is highly profitable, doesn’t play scared - and refuses to be prey. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋 beincrypto.com/mexc-responds-…

Update: MEXC Attempts To Lure The White Whale To Meet In Person...For Potentially Sinister Reasons?? I received an email from MEXC (with my anti-phishing code and from their official domain). I triple-verified - it was authentic. The email claimed: “Our leadership team attaches great importance to cooperation with you and is very much looking forward to having a one-on-one communication with you to deeply understand your needs and expectations. To this end, we sincerely invite you to have in-depth communication with the leadership team.” They asked me to verify my TG ID. Once I did, I wasn’t met by a “leadership team.” Just one person: their Global Head of Customer Service - whose identity I confirmed through multiple channels including other MEXC employees. Then came the punchline: he insisted I travel to Malaysia to “complete KYC in person.” Let’s be clear. I’ve already done every form of KYC they’ve ever asked for: live video, address verification, phone number, multiple identity layers. Their own Terms of Service contain zero mention of any requirement for in-person KYC. Crypto kidnappings are on the rise - why would someone with over $100M on-chain ever agree to fly to another country and enter the lion’s den of an organization he's publicly protesting against? When I rejected the idea, his reply was telling: “But I understood that you have sought to expedite the unfreezing of your account.” Translation: If you want your funds, get on a plane. This is not compliance. This is coercion. What MEXC is attempting here isn’t “verification.” It’s intimidation dressed up as procedure. They are inventing roadblocks that don’t exist in their own rulebook, while dangling access to my rightful funds like ransom. If they can do this to me, they can do this to anyone. The question now is simple: How long will the industry turn a blind eye while exchanges resort to tactics that belong in crime thrillers, not capital markets? I know we’ve got their attention. Maybe we just haven’t been loud enough yet. I told him to come back to me when MEXC was ready to be serious. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

I Need Your Help - And I'm Putting a $2M Bounty Up For Grabs (half can be claimed by YOU) Let me start by saying - "I know, I was dumb" (more on that in the FAQs, but no need to comment how dumb I was - I just beat you to it) In July 2025, @MEXC_Official froze over $3 million of my funds. $3,158,572.32 to be precise. No warning. No explanation. No Terms of Service violation - because there was none. That money came from my hard-earned savings, and every dollar I earned on the platform came from clean, legitimate, skill-based trading. My only conceivable offense? I was too profitable. (in the long list of public replies to other traders who experienced the same thing I was able to find ONE instance where they accidentally admitted this as a potential cause). I consistently beat their external market makers - the firms they quietly partner with to be the counter-party to trades (this is public record). When the counter-party they need in order to stay in business consistently looses? Who's side do you think they will pick? So what did MEXC do? They retaliated. They froze my account. And now, they’ve told me the “review process” will take up to one full year. Let that sink in: No specific allegation No evidence of wrongdoing Just a vague “review” that conveniently lets them hold my money hostage indefinitely What kind of review takes 12 months - without a single update, document, or charge? You see I had already been through their most advanced KYC process possible and passed with flying colors. But this is bigger than me. It’s about every trader who’s ever been punished for winning, punished for exposing CEX dirty little secrets, or robbed by a centralized exchange hiding behind offshore protections in jurisdictions with limited legal recourse. We are not your exit liquidity. We are not your prey. We are the tide. And the tide is turning. #FreeTheWhiteWhale #MEXCFreeze