William

8.2K posts

William

William

@Viirush

currently doing a PhD

Katılım Ocak 2014
121 Takip Edilen96 Takipçiler
William
William@Viirush·
@Daniel7Prinsloo It doesn't look right when he smiles, and I assume it would look even less right if he speaks
English
0
0
0
661
Daniel Prinsloo
Daniel Prinsloo@Daniel7Prinsloo·
And thats just a random guy, imagine a government's AI
English
127
2.5K
33.5K
1.5M
William
William@Viirush·
@indi_hartwell This is useful for seats that you don't occupy but you have luggage on. Car systems often assume that's a person sitting there
English
0
0
0
4
William
William@Viirush·
@wifibun It became popular after a while when all bugs were fixed because of how paris look in this game, it's not a 2026 thing
English
0
0
0
6
William
William@Viirush·
@coofcopsreal @ballvings @ShitpostRock2 What? Id there's one thing that could be considered vanity, it's buying more expensive frames, not thinner lenses. Frames are typically much cheaper than lenses by the way, unless you go high end
English
1
0
2
21
legrosfaisandusud
legrosfaisandusud@legrosfaisandu1·
@encoreskood En vrai on peut m'expliquer le fonctionnement ? Je vois pas mal de clip avec ce genre de kill et j'arrive pas a comprendre comment c'est possible alors que techniquement le viseur est à côté
Français
5
0
1
8.5K
Dupe
Dupe@lul_dupe·
@sibaburck @Viirush Me reducing ur position to its logical end to show that ur worldview justifies raping children and murdering people and having sex with kids is 100% a win for you. I’ll give you 5 more minutes to prove me wrong by proving objective morality. If u refuse ur a pedo apologist.
English
1
0
0
33
Dupe
Dupe@lul_dupe·
@sibaburck Nice question dodge. I’ll ask again. So for the countries that do practice dog eating like China are you saying these countries and these people are OBJECTIVELY immoral? If u are can i please provide that standard? If ur not ur complaining about a meaningless preference.
English
1
0
0
45
William
William@Viirush·
@eterniiel Depending on the source you get numbers that vary between <0.1 ml and >5 liters lmao. Don't take these numbers for granted, look at their analysis.
English
1
0
2
3K
Damen Clegg
Damen Clegg@DamenClegg·
@_glorianas Well…no. It’s not wasteful. We are getting something useful out of it. But it does consume more than data centers.
English
2
0
0
841
William
William@Viirush·
@valentindmtr115 @zuhaitz_dev @morallawwithin The answer to this question does not dictate whether it is morally wrong for us to harm them when it can be avoided. It is not incoherent to not ascribe moral weight to natural interactions that do not involve humans.
English
1
0
0
28
florence ⏹️
florence ⏹️@morallawwithin·
Over time I grow more worried that veganism is mainly just an intelligence thing. It really scares me.
English
50
15
473
42.3K
William
William@Viirush·
@valentindmtr115 @zuhaitz_dev @morallawwithin I'm not sure what your argument is. Are you saying in a natural state we didn't care about animal suffering, that this natural state dictates our morality, so that we still shouldn't care about it now?
English
1
0
0
34
Valentin Dumitru
Valentin Dumitru@valentindmtr115·
@Viirush @zuhaitz_dev @morallawwithin No because our nature is moral. Our morality forbids it those actions. But what I am saying is that our morality does not really involve animal suffering. We have a selective empathy and we don't care about natural animal suffering.
English
1
0
0
35
Valentin Dumitru
Valentin Dumitru@valentindmtr115·
@Viirush @zuhaitz_dev @morallawwithin It is, because humans are part of nature as much as a snake eating a rat is. What is morally wrong is us not caring that we harm animals. Under this premise, treating well and still consuming animals is morally justifiable. Even more if we grief them.
English
2
0
0
144
Valentin Dumitru
Valentin Dumitru@valentindmtr115·
@zuhaitz_dev @morallawwithin Veganism is extremely hard to justify morally, otherwise we deem nature immoral because allows animal suffering. I agree the food industry is cruel, but not because we really empathize with animals. But bc we see humans reflected in animals and torture corrupts human spirit.
English
2
0
1
270
PETA
PETA@peta·
Chickens aren’t food.
English
2.1K
162
1.2K
1.4M
Vik von Lustig 🇺🇸
Vik von Lustig 🇺🇸@realcountlustig·
@peta @JesseJVinegar Plants are living too. Why do you live in houses made of once living trees and eat once living vegetables and plants? Why is that okay? Because they look less similar to you than animals? Because they don’t have lungs or a heart? You’re philosophically bankrupt
English
2
0
8
185