Voltek77

@nobodyatallbros In other words, he repented of his adultery.

People discovering that Seraphim Rose thought sex was evil and was a prancing la la homo man distracts from his other major theological beliefs like how when you die your soul has to pass through 20 magic toll houses run by demons before you can get to Heaven.

@nobodyatallbros The Toll Houses are neither confirmed nor denied within the Orthodox Church. Also, Seraphim WAS homosexual. Key word is "was", because he ended the relationship and became a monk to focus on his spiritual life with God.

@T_H_GOD @SPOOOKYUFO You are, in fact, correct. However, what you need to understand is Christians and aliens are, in fact, fighting. These aliens in their UFO's are not an extraterrestrial race: they're demons that have gotten bolder

@SPOOOKYUFO Christianity and the concept of Aliens do not mix. And im worried they will be peaceful and the christians will try to start a war with what they dont understand.

Pastors Told to Prepare‼️👽🛸 Per pastor Perry Stone, “a large number” of pastors were invited to a meeting with individuals from the US government telling them to prepare for UFO disclosure: “There's going to be a release concerning aliens… You need to prepare your people.”

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 It isn't, when comparing to other people during that time, where women were nothing more than property. But with the Hebrews, women had significantly more rights

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 I don't doubt that you dare. I can't imagine why you would, since it's a patently absurd claim to make. But if it's all about having the courage to be wrong, I have absolute confidence in you.

@Orthodoxer88 @jvlad20 Amen

@VoltektheCyborg @jvlad20 My grandfather was a Freemason and I feel compelled to tell my countrymen of the evils of it, Hinduism, the occult and all other evil religions.

“Why is it snowing?” ☦️ A powerful Orthodox cartoon about the Patriotic War of 1812. French General Eugène de Beauharnais, occupies St. Savva’s monastery. His troops begin looting… until St. Savva appears to him in a vision: “Do not plunder the church.” Eugène obeys, spares the monastery, and returns home safely with his men. He venerated St. Savva for life, and his descendants later embraced Orthodoxy and served Russia.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 So were the victims back then under Israel able to do. Women under Israel had many right. Dare I say: they have more rights then any man or woman today have.

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 You were deflecting away from their "court" (in which the victim isn't permitted to speak, by comparing it to today's failures due to human error. Look, I agree. Our courts SUCK at punishing rape. But at least the victims are allowed to accuse.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Wrong: Victims, as well as the Perps, were allowed to speak their peace. That is how trials, ideally, are supposed to work. And yes: I can compare it to today's failures, for no matter the time frame, all humans sin. From the 10th century BC to the 21st century AD today

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 All rapists are adulterers. Not all adulterers are rapists. So it's a yes or nor You do not know love. If you knew love, you would not slander and lie. You do not know forgiveness. If you did, you would rebuke, not confront.

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Says the guy who equates an adulterer to a rapist. I do know love and forgiveness. But I also know there are times for confrontation.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 I'm a heavy procrastinator, but I did pay attention rather well to what the Baptists were saying during my homeschool years

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Have you read your book?

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 She may have had influence. But how far can influence go? The fact that the Persian King allowed Esther to rule as she did said more than influence: she had power

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 1. Queen Esther was a Hebrew, but she was a queen under a Persian king. Hebrew laws had nothing to do with her position. 2. She also never wielded official authority. She used influence, not authority. And even to use influence, she was risking her life to do it. Read it again.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Because "empathy" does not make up morals. Vengeance could make up morals, according to Atheism

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 I do have the moral high ground, and it isn't based on your god's morality. It's based on empathy. A trait your god apparently forgot to bestow upon himself. Or his author did.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Where does Empathy come from?

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Oh no. I wanted to stop the argument to Nowhere entirely. Yet you are willing to keep it moving. Let me ask: why do you think God is a sociopath. And with that: explain to me the human psychology behind sociopathy

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Your version of God is a sociopath. We can move on if you like.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Whataboutism would be, "But what about you? What about Budhism". I said, "About what happens today: a court is held". I didn't dodge the question: I answered your question. Now you're conflating fallacy and answers

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 If you were truly righteous, you would forgive your enemies: to forgive those who wronged you. You would not care the fabrics you wore, nor the food you ate. If you were truly righteous, you would know love and forgiveness. And yet all I feel from you is hate and vengeance

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Yes, if I were truly righteous, I would stone to death every adulterer...and witches,,,and people who take brides from other nations, or wear polyester, or who refuse to kill gods enemies, and any man who denies god. And my personal favorite, all disobedient children.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 No you didn't. You just made up a contradiction, and claimed it to be true

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Then I showed you a glaring example in which he did.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Actually, yes: Hebrew Queens held as much power as the King, and could make and enforce laws to the court. Look at Queen Esther, while under Persian Authority

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 And what actual authority would that ONE woman in the entire civilization, actually wield? The answer is none. No actual power. Influence MAYBE if the king chose to listen, but no actual authority of her own.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Says the person who's morality is directly based on the God you scorn. Yet here you are, corrupting God's morality, while claiming to have the "moral highground" when your morality is stuck in the mud.

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 We can go on or not, but based on this position, neither you, nor your god have any moral or ethical credibility.

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 Asking what's wrong with me is akin to asking what is wrong with Jeffery Dahmer. We're both fucked. But yes, both are in the same category, for both contradict and corrupt God's ordination of Marriage

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Do you think that a person who has cheated on his spouse with a willing partner is the same as a person who fucks a woman without her permission? You seriously put those in the same category? What? Because both "sins" involve genitals? What the hell is wrong with you?!

@JayRogers24 @philosophymeme0 I am not "whatabouting". Whataboutism involves dodging the question by asking "what about". I am further giving arguments to my position, which are to attack your position. You're being dishonest by dodging my arguments

@VoltektheCyborg @philosophymeme0 Your whataboutism is dishonest.