No on Prop 33

Thank you for voting NO on Prop 33! Together, we’ve stopped the flawed initiative that would have made California’s housing crisis even worse.

“With Prop. 33, cities would be free to regulate your single-family house – making it virtually impossible to evict a tenant so you can move back in.” Read more from the OC Register on why you should vote NO on Prop 33: bit.ly/3BFLRU7

The San Francisco Chronicle says that one of Prop 33’s provisions is a “recipe for disaster” that could lead to some communities building even less housing. Check out why they urge NO on Prop 33. bit.ly/4eHWm8b

Another major newspaper urges NO on Prop 33. The OC Register rightly points out that Prop 33 “discourages investors from building new apartments” and will only make the housing crisis worse. bit.ly/3BFLRU7

The San Francisco Chronicle urges a NO vote on Prop 33, calling it “even more flawed than its predecessors” that were overwhelmingly rejected by voters. Read the full editorial here 👇 bit.ly/4eHWm8b

“[Prop 33] would undermine our efforts, stall home building, and reverse the progress we’ve worked so hard to achieve.” – San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria bit.ly/3MM8mJq

Non-partisan experts predict that Prop 33 will cost local governments tens of millions in tax revenue, leaving less money for essential services to administer, leading to even higher fees and driving up the cost of housing. That’s one more reason to vote NO on Prop 33.

“Prop 33 would make it harder for San Jose, and the state of California, to meet our affordable housing goals and help families wrestling with skyrocketing housing costs." – San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan bit.ly/3ZKy3C3

“Rent control has been about as disgraced as any economic policy in the tool kit,” -Jason Furman, the top economic adviser to the Obama administration. A vote for Prop 33 is a vote for failed rent control policies. Vote NO. bit.ly/3XAmUky

“Proposition 33 is so broad that key Democratic housing advocates, including state Sen. Toni Atkins, the party’s former leader in the Senate, and Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, oppose it.” bayareane.ws/47qww5L

Did you know that Prop 33 opens the door to rent control on single-family homes—potentially devastating retirees and other homeowners who rely on rental income? Get the facts about Prop 33 bit.ly/3XJZtWZ

“Expanding rent control would only exacerbate the state’s housing crisis.” Read more from the Mercury News Editorial urging No on Prop 33. bit.ly/4d60q0p

Check out this explainer of Prop 33, the 3rd attempt to pass a flawed rent control law. bit.ly/3zjQZN4

“Voters should reject Proposition 33.” Read why another newspaper urges No on Prop 33, citing that it could worsen California’s housing crisis and “reduce the amount of available rental units.” Check out the full editorial. bit.ly/4gqmPIG

Read why 22 mayors across California agree that Prop 33 is an anti-housing initiative. Vote no on Prop 33. bit.ly/3MM8mJq

Democrats, Republicans and Independents agree. Prop 33 is not a solution to California’s affordable housing crisis. Vote NO on Prop 33 this November and join our coalition today! bit.ly/4daaUM4

“Rent control discourages investment in new housing, constraining supply and driving up overall housing costs. Which is why voters should reject Proposition 33 on the Nov. 5 statewide ballot.” Read from the Mercury News Editorial against Prop 33. 👇 bit.ly/4d60q0p

“We hope the voters see the Pandora’s box Proposition 33 would create and reject it by at least the same margin it has rejected two previous attempts to [pass rent control ballot measures].” Read more on NFIB’s opposition to Prop 33. 👇 bit.ly/3Xbs72U

Did you know Prop 33 undermines a California law limiting rent increases? Get the facts about Prop 33 here: votenoprop33.com/facts/

Want to know more about the third flawed attempt to impose rent control on California? Check out this explainer. bit.ly/3AplJw8