Ben

Ffs arsenal, you better not let em win the league now.

It's always the ones you least expect...

@NoContextCounty Bill Format, plays for Barnet green in the Worcestershire village league, horrible bastard.

You can eliminate one format from the sport, which do you pick?

@LawTop20 Not 5?

On the current evidence and given that #ManUtd will be playing #CL football next season, my respectful opinion is that they need, quite possibly, to add 4 new midfielders. Not 2, not 3, but 4 (consider exits too). #IKN

@Malachians The one we got in the palace game was pretty soft. Sometimes it goes for you sometimes it doesn't, the nature of the sport.

They’ll get an apology that will barely get any coverage, Dermot Gallagher will make up some wibble how it’s not a penalty and it will happen again in a couple of weeks.

On Amad and Evanilson penalty situations. Both might or might not have been penalties. They are subjective, in the grey zone. So on-field decision stands. VAR's role is not, and ever has been, to create consistency of decision making. Each is judged individually. #BOUMUN

But he literally can. They are subjective situations and it's entirely possible to think one is a penalty and the other is not.

@antpaulbloom It wasn't that bad, he maybe got the amad one wrong, but apart from that didn't get much else wrong really, did he?

Hope Carrick has complained about that officiating.

@poculumwinecup I think the ref gets the amad one wrong, but that doesn't mean he should even it up by letting Maguire stop evanilson scoring.

The fact that people think the two situations are remotely similar is hilarious

@2srewobmas It's not a pen because he'd just given one.

How’s that not a penalty 😂😂

@Douglasc57 @antpaulbloom I guess we agree then, Chelsea are proven cheats, and united "could well of been" 🤝

@VoteSurridge @antpaulbloom Two wrongs dont make a right.You practically just admitted utd could well of been cheating.

Always called Chelsea the original cheats. At least the current ownership flagged it up. This is why people will always shrug their shoulders when they or city win stuff. All doesn't count.

@Douglasc57 @antpaulbloom Also worth adding, united fans have in the 30+yrs I've been following them, always suspicious of the ownership and most would welcome punishment if guilty, majority don't want Ratcliffe involved. Chelsea on the other hand welcomed an oligarch with open arms.

@Douglasc57 @antpaulbloom £228m in transfers in, £61.6m transfers out so your numbers are wrong to begin with. Also structured to be paid over 6 seasons upfront costs are much lower again. as stated previously, man united are on the NYSE so must produce quarterly accounts, Chelsea do not.

When you're reminded to block out Tues/Weds nights next season

@JeremyNic666 @GoodLawProject Doesn't the government subsidise fossil fuels to the tune of 15bn per year?

@GoodLawProject Economics has never been George's strong point. If renewables are highly competitive, as alleged, why are they low profit? If fossil fuels are uncompetitive, as alleged, why are they high profit?

Absolutely bang on from George Monbiot here 🎯 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

@rant_zine @WatcherGuru US also uses about 20m barrels of oil each day, so they are still net buyers of oil.

Trump just said the US makes "a lot of money" when oil prices rise because it's the world's largest oil producer. 🛢 Let me explain why he's both right and wrong: He's right: ✅️ > The US produces 13.5M barrels per day (world's largest) > Federal government collects $7-10B/year in royalties from oil production on federal lands > When oil prices rise $10/barrel, federal revenue increases ~$2B > Oil company profits rise (more corporate tax revenue) But here's what he left out: ❌️ When oil prices rise, 65% of the benefit goes to private oil companies. 15% goes to the federal government. 10% goes to state governments. And consumers? They pay higher gas prices. The economics: Higher oil prices = More revenue for producers + government. But that same price increase hits every American filling up their tank. Trump's statement is economically accurate. The US does make money when oil prices rise. But so do oil companies. And consumers pay the bill.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump says the US makes "a lot of money" when oil prices rise because it is the world's largest oil producer.

@IGN Two words: Baby yoda

Predator: Badlands director Dan Trachtenberg has explained why he held his ground on the sidekick character Bud, despite his editor telling him he sounded like Jar Jar Binks. bit.ly/4ljeM32

🚨🇬🇧 WATCH: Protesters in London campaign against the war in Iran

Yeah, it was probably freezer children. Seems believable.

Why is the US waging war on Iran? Secretary of state Marco Rubio said the Trump administration knew Israel was about to launch an attack on Iran and wanted to “pre-emptively” attack the Islamic Republic before it could retaliate. But Trump has also talked about ballistic missiles, Iran’s nuclear programme and the prospect of regime change. With the death of Ayatollah Khamanei, critics say that the reshaping of power across the region will reinforce US-Israeli hegemony.