@scurysp@malacksss@Pai_estovir Apocalipse 5:8
1. Quem já foi salvo, está na plentide.
2. Quem não foi salvo e foi condenado, de nada servem as orações.
3. Só restam os vivos e as almas do purgatório.
@scurysp@malacksss@Pai_estovir Não existe diálogo meu caro… existe um monólogo de quem pede a intercessão… e os vivos em Cristo partilham da sua Glória… o livro do apocalipse é simples para entender. O ofertório das orações dos Santos é isto mesmo:
@scurysp@malacksss@Pai_estovir 1. Abraão ouve o rico que está no inferno.
2. Estamos a dar-lhe informação para que rezem por nós. Necromancia é o que Saul fez com o profeta Samuel…
@Voxservi@malacksss@Pai_estovir Deuteronômio 18:10-12
Eclesiastes 9:5-6
a parábola do Rico e Lázaro em Lucas 16:19-31, onde "há um grande abismo entre nós e vós"...
não tem possibilidade de consultarmos pessoas mortas, além de Deus por si só já abominar (1 Crônicas 10:13-14)
@Voxservi@malacksss@Pai_estovir ainda é tentar se comunicar com mortos.
os mortos já habitam com Deus e lá vivem com Ele.
não tem acesso nosso a quem já foi arrebatado, seja santo ou não.
@Voxservi@MetzUAC1530 Slow down, dude.
What are the two facts? You used a rhetorical question, but you didn't make a point, and you didn't state any facts.
This is what I said, "It took them 500 years to finally let Catholics read the Bible, translated from the original Hebrew and Greek, in their own language."
What is the first roman catholic bible translation of the original Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew into English or any common language? I think previously I said it was the New American Bible, but that's actually incorrect. It was the Confraternity Bible (New Testament) and Knox Bible (OT and NT).
@mqulis@MetzUAC1530 If it was for the nobles, keeping peasants illiterate, the better. Since the Middle Ages the Catholic Church did built not only schools. If we put theological arguments away and humbly discuss social part of the church you’ll recognize it was the ignition for Europe development.
@Voxservi@mqulis As Luther’s theology grew, he rejected the entire concept of indulgences. They really are silly and needless in the first place. Their mere existence is an abuse.
@mqulis@MetzUAC1530 Have you read it? Clearly you didn’t. It is not the concept that Luther was against, it was against the abuses, which all Catholics are. Read the article.
@mqulis@MetzUAC1530 Oh Tyndale’s heretic translations which were confronted by Thomas More? Not an expert, I suppose you are? But since you didn’t reflect on the part 2 facts I mentioned I don’t believe you are?
@mqulis@Voxservi It would be nice if, sometime within the next 500 years, the papacy would acknowledge that it is at fault for the split in Christianity during the Reformation. I’m not holding my breath.