Dam

@PAHoyeck You just hate us cuz you ain't us, lol

Apparently this is a hot take, but you haven't actually read a book unless you've read it cover to cover. Skimming select chapters, reading an AI summary of the book, or watching a YouTube video about it do not give you anywhere near the same grasp on the material as reading it.

@ScholarshipfPhd Hi

Say hi and I’ll recommend a research topic that perfectly fits your X/ Twitter profile.

@_fels1 There wear condoms instead??

We should all strive to make the world a better place.

@OtitoNosike Bookmarked. I love all JP credit.

I have never understood, and still do not understand, why people loathe Jordan Peterson. For me, he is the most compelling philosopher of the 21st century. His ideas have reshaped how the modern man, particularly in the West, sees himself. And this is not even limited to the West. Any sensible young man can recognize the value in his thinking; lessons that, if practiced as he presents them, have the power to turn one’s life around.

@Charafantasme كنضن أنه غير كيسحابليك أنه كانو كيبنيو عليهم الهايب. فالحقيقة، من ديما مكيتبناش عليهم الهايب ولكن كيلعبو ماتش واحد واعر ضد فرقة كبيرة وعاد كيفيقو الناس ليهم.

ديك هولندا تا حد ما بقا كيبني عليها شي Hype كيف ما كان مستواها، الذاكرة الجماعية ترسخات فيها فكرة أنهم را واخا يكونو مزيان عمرهم غا يربحو داك اللقب.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks Absolutely, very glad!!

@WRITINGFORGOD13 @SRCHicks This was a nice thread. Thanks.

Become a lean, mean language machine.

@mohamme18092032 @FRMFXtra Okey hhhhhhhhh

@WRITINGFORGOD13 @FRMFXtra hhhhhh hdmolah lahoma ndir taswira d xabi alonso wla dial diaz, diaz hyato kamla mayosalch ta rbe3 dl carrière d alonso, rah ha ntoma li katchofih world class ama hna f madrid rah bnsba lina ha la3ib dial l banc touche, la3ab mdawz 70% dlw9t dial f real f l banc touche 😂😂

Brahim Díaz ne ralentit pas : après son match avec le Real Madrid hier, le voilà déjà à Maâmora (Rabat) aujourd’hui. Enchaînement express, mentalité élite. 🇲🇦😍

@mohamme18092032 @FRMFXtra Sat nta dayr tswira d Xabi Alonso, hania hhhhhhhhhhhh

@FRMFXtra ba3da wach had l7iis li katl7es lhad sbalyouni d diaz katkhalas 3lih , wla kadrblo l7issat fabor au moins tkhalas 3la had l7is kaml

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks Yes, it's very possible.

@WRITINGFORGOD13 @SRCHicks It's been awhile since I have read Mead, but I'm not sure that Kant is as disembodied as he is interpreted to be, due to the fact that he was fairly clear in stipulating that all knowledge falls within the bounds of possible experience. I recall favoring Mead.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks It's not because Kant is also disembodied and acknowledges pure reason, unlike lakoff, whose constructivism is about the interaction between the mind, the body, and reality. (To note, Lakoff doesn't reject innate capacities at all, but they are not symbolic to him.)

@WRITINGFORGOD13 @SRCHicks Why do you think this is not Kantian Constructivism? If we cannot deduce our way out of the problem, we are constrained to Kantian Constructivism. No? This, however, does leave open the possibility of another form of inference that is not constructivism.

@Zahri_10i Infinite potential

مامعنى perfect

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks It's not a form of Kantian constructivism, but it is surely a kind of constructivisim. However, although it doesn't align with absolute truth, it aligns with objective truth through convergence. This is what makes Lakoff's work to be very favored in neuroscience, unlike Chomsky.

@WRITINGFORGOD13 @SRCHicks "...he is a realist that acknowledges truth (but as constructed understanding rather than certain)." Isn't this another form of Kantian Constructivism? Hulē, to me, resembles the thought of Jacob Klein. A type of constraint on the subject/object universe of discourse.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks I would love to know how was your experience with linguistics overall and what you think about it.

@WRITINGFORGOD13 @SRCHicks I have misspoken. I am familiar with Lakoff's "Metaphors we live by," but fell out with the discourse about the same time I stoped reading Chomsky.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks It also seems to me that it follows that illusions aren't lies but a different level of reality that cloaks the objective world when perception is laden by the unconscious, so illusions can be thought of as useful mechanisms of the body that uncovers valuable knowledge.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks Therefore, he does value the body as an essential participant in meaning construction along with the mind and the world. Radial assertion is less platonic than Aristotle's Hule. Lakoff's cognition is also very inclusive, so a cog ling can use Cartesian theories in some contexts.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks Also, if the body is inferior (ex. Competence/performance by Chomsky), and metaphor uses the body, why would it be pervasive?? Lakoff also disagrees with Aristotle in that Aristotle categorizes classically with sufficient and necessary conditions rather than radially.

@bloggerwog @SRCHicks You can find metaphor everywhere even in very technical books. Without metaphor, abstract concepts cannot be understood. So, back to the philosophical grounding, Lakoff is grounded in experientialism and empiricism.