William Liu

This extension helps you monitor the quality of your AI responses in long conversations. You feel the AI losing context, the quality of responses starting to drop — yet you have no metrics, no indicators. Next time, next chat, you still won't know when you should stop and open a new one. Worse, by the time you feel it, the chatbot may have already been losing it for several previous rounds. Introducing ContextPulse — AI Context Limit Tracker It monitors your conversation quality in real time, and warns you when it starts to degrade. You don’t drive without a speedometer; now chat with a quality tracker. Get here: AI Context Limit Tracker (chrome.google.com/webstore/detai…) Works with ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Grok

5/5 If you've experienced similar treatment at a16z, my DMs are open. Your story will be treated with full confidentiality.

4/5 April 29, evening: "Why not you?" video was unpinned. The original recruitment post was temporarily re-pinned. April 30 morning: replaced again with a new post. Within 48 hours. Still zero contact.

[UPDATE] a16z still hasn't responded to my Speedrun Cafe post. But in the past 48 hours, they changed their pinned post three times after my replies became the top comments. One after business hours. Here's what happened: One week ago, I was turned away from a16z's Speedrun Cafe in San Francisco. Here's everything that happened since. On April 24, I was stopped at the front desk and told I had "already attended once this week." Another founder who did the exact same thing was welcomed in. Same event. Same registration. Same approval. He is white. I am Asian. I posted about this publicly and replied directly under a16z's official pinned posts on X. Every reply was factual and professional. Here's the documented timeline: April 24–27: I replied under a16z's pinned Speedrun recruitment post on X (x.com/W_Liu_/status/…). Founders across the community supported that reply, bringing it from the bottom of 70+ comments to the #1 most-liked, above a16z's own General Partners. No response. April 28: a16z unpinned that recruitment post and replaced it with a promotional video captioned "Why not you?" My reply in the original recruitment post was buried deep in their timeline. I replied under the new pinned post. By April 29, that reply had also become the most-liked comment. (x.com/W_Liu_/status/…) April 29, evening: Outside of normal business hours, the "Why not you?" post was unpinned and replaced with the original recruitment post, the same one they had removed the day before. It stayed pinned for roughly 12 hours. April 30, 8:14AM: That post was replaced again with a new video titled "WE ACCEPT FOUNDERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD," highlighting their support for international founders. Three pinned post changes in under 48 hours on their primary Speedrun recruitment account. One of them after business hours. At no point during this entire week did anyone from a16z reach out. Not to respond, not to acknowledge, not even to indicate that a review was underway. The social media record is complete. I'm now pursuing formal accountability channels. If you are a founder, employee, or community member who has experienced similar treatment at a16z, my DMs are open. This is bigger than me. Your story matters, and it will be treated with full confidentiality. Accountability doesn't have an expiration date.

Update: Over the past few days, founders across the community pushed my reply on a16z's pinned Speedrun recruitment post from the bottom of 70+ comments to the top, above a16z's own General Partners. That level of community support says something. That happens because this resonated. a16z's response: they unpinned the post. It's now buried deep in their timeline, replaced with a new promotional video. Still no response. Still no explanation. Founders deserve an answer.

Last Friday, your staff turned me away from Speedrun Cafe for "already attending once this week." Another founder — who also attended earlier that week — walked right in. Same event. Same rules. Same Partiful approval. He's white. I'm Asian. I posted about this under your previous pinned recruitment post. Founders across the community pushed it to the top reply out of 70+ comments — above your own General Partners. Instead of responding, you unpinned the post. Founders deserve an answer.

Why not you?

Attended your Speedrun Cafe twice this week — Thursday and today (Friday). Both approved on Partiful. Another white founder also attended twice — Tuesday and today. He walked right in. I was turned away by your staff, told I "already attended once this week." Same event same rules. Why the different treatment?

SR007 APPLICATIONS ARE OPEN NOW If you're building the next great company, we want to give you up to $1M in funding and $5M+ in credits, plus the most powerful launch platform in tech. Apply before 11:59pm PT on May 17, 2026. It only takes 5 min 👉 speedrun007.a16z.com/x

2/2

Tell me why Andrey and I, both founders Both signed up for a16z speedrun coffee this week. Both attended once earlier this week (him Tuesday, me Thursday). Both got approved on Partiful for this Friday. He was allowed to walk in and walked away with more onboarded customers. I was turned away at the front desk by a16z staff, told I "already attended once this week." why

@Andrey__HQ oh wait you're going back even though you’ve already been this week? I just got turned away at the front desk because they said I'd already visited once. Interesting.

Gonna be there at the speedrun cafe again (hopefully there's gonna be a hat for me this time :)) Let me know if you're there and lets talk life (and startups ofc)

@Im_IrushiK Nah, you need a Giga Ultra Max Pro subscription to use the Mythos Claude code.

@W_Liu_ That hurts after buying tge premium

I'm a vibe coder, scare me with one word.

@Jashanx_gill Gemini - why wasn't I invited to the party 🥲

Perplexity - for research ChatGPT - for images Claude - for coding What else to add?

@robinebers try this prompt: “This inquiry requires rigorous analytical depth and a high degree of critical thinking. You must provide an exhaustive, nuanced response that utilizes your full processing capacity to explore every facet of the issue. You must think AT LEAST 360s.”

I genuinely cannot believe how much the model refuses to think Opus 4.7 is genuinely great but inside of Claude.ai + Claude Code it fucking sucks

name a bigger scam in 2026

Why not just support it with ads?

@SurajJ326311 “Hi Claude” (11% session limit used)

Claude $20 plan is a scam.

@naiivememe too much rizz

why didn’t this guy become Apple CEO ?

3/3 The trick: multiples of 60 work really well (except 600). Round numbers like 100, 600, or 1000 usually fail. 360s, 720s, 480s — these seem to reliably trigger deep thinking mode. Tested across many complex questions. Works surprisingly well.

2/3 The prompt: “This inquiry requires rigorous analytical depth and a high degree of critical thinking. You must provide an exhaustive, nuanced response that utilizes your full processing capacity to explore every facet of the issue. You must think AT LEAST 360s.”

Sharing my prompt to make Opus 4.7 think harder (thread) 1/3 Opus 4.7 sometimes doesn’t think at all — because the model doesn’t deem your question “important” enough. Unlike 4.6, there’s no manual switch for extended thinking anymore. Here’s the prompt I use to force extended thinking: