w h i t

16.5K posts

w h i t banner
w h i t

w h i t

@whit

(he/him) skeets at whitmo . b s k y .social x erased my alt-werk xeets account... System maker and breaker, hire me!

Bend, OR Katılım Aralık 2008
582 Takip Edilen607 Takipçiler
w h i t retweetledi
Karri Saarinen
Karri Saarinen@karrisaarinen·
What if we built better software, not just more of it?
English
179
144
1.6K
66.3K
w h i t retweetledi
Tuomas Artman
Tuomas Artman@artman·
Today is a hard day. I shared this note with the @linear team today: We’ve made the difficult decision to increase our workforce. This is not a cost-cutting exercise or a reflection of anyone’s performance. We’re simply reimagining every role for the agentic AI era. We’re hiring. We’re sorry about that.
English
449
643
14K
973.2K
w h i t
w h i t@whit·
@flowpoke I have a hunch you could take the jsonl output of pi and ship it via CRDT to get an etherpad like experience in the terminal
English
0
0
1
51
Benjamin Keating
Benjamin Keating@flowpoke·
pair·prompt·ing /ˈpɛr ˈprɒmptɪŋ/ n. [informal, comp. slang] A collaborative practice in which two or more engineers jointly author AI prompts in real time, riffing off each other’s instincts until the model feels the vibes.
English
1
1
2
71
w h i t
w h i t@whit·
@sontek you just need to fight context rot in humans obviously
English
0
0
0
9
sontek
sontek@sontek·
Working with humans instead of agents is rough. Asked claude to analyze the last month of PRs for code review comments to find patterns I could write skills on. "Diagnosis: The cursor-bot caught correctness issues, human reviewers caught taste/hygiene issues" The humans are focusing on the wrong thing!
English
1
0
1
77
w h i t
w h i t@whit·
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropom… best I can tell, my brain is assessing these models by assigning personalities to them like the vampire captain in Blindsight analyzing data by staring into renderings of agonizing faces.
English
0
0
0
18
w h i t
w h i t@whit·
[trying deepseek and qwen via aws bedrock] It's weird how these difference in training data result in difference in behavior that result in what feels like . . . differences in personality.
English
1
0
0
74
w h i t retweetledi
okazakitomohiro
okazakitomohiro@oo_kk_aa·
ニャッキの伊藤有壱さんにお声掛け頂き、コマ撮りの展覧会に一作家として参加しています。私はコマ撮り分野ではない場所から活動をはじめて、デザインの視点でのコマ撮りに取り組んできましたが、今回初めてコマ撮り界の本丸の方々とご一緒でき嬉しいです。今6年目のマッチ撮影素材等を展示しています
日本語
528
27.4K
124.4K
5.1M
w h i t retweetledi
LaurieWired
LaurieWired@lauriewired·
There’s a famous Usenet story about a programmer (Mel) who refused higher level abstractions. It was the late 1950s, and even in that era, Mel was…well today we’d call him a boomer. Mel only wrote in raw hexadecimal. He didn’t approve of compilers, and refused to use optimizing assemblers. "You never know where it's going to put things”, he said. Everyone else in the company was moving on to FORTRAN, and they didn’t understand why Mel was so stubborn about using new tools. He *loved* self-modifying code. “If a program can’t rewrite its own code”, he asked, “what good is it?” Mel eventually left the company, and other engineers were tasked with understanding what was left. Mel’s hand-optimized routines always beat the assemblers; but some of it looked absolutely bizarre. One engineer took ~2 weeks to understand why there were loops with no exit condition…yet the program worked fine. I won’t spoil all the details, you should really read it, it’s short. But it’s a fantastic piece on “what defines a real programmer?”…which is becoming increasingly relevant in this vibe-coded era. I strive to understand computers as deeply as Mel! If we aren’t careful, we’re going to lose the “Mels” of this world to time. That’s part of why I go so deep in my youtube videos. I hope that younger viewers are genuinely fascinated by the inner workings of our machines, instead of handing everything off to higher abstractions.
solst/ICE of Astarte@IceSolst

Interesting article on treating agent output like compiler output (and why) skiplabs.io/blog/codegen_a…

English
200
723
8.8K
583.9K
w h i t
w h i t@whit·
@dotpem Sounds like these things have not changed since 2000 which is kinda dope. And ime the crisis of meaning is perpetual state of angst in NorCal probably dating back to the original gold rush. The secret is, like a tiny microplastic Jesus, the meaning lives in your heart.
English
0
0
1
16
Nathan LeClaire
Nathan LeClaire@dotpem·
7. you can literally vibe out at the park with your friends, go to awesome shows, eat amazing food, go to parades and other sorts of random events that are happening all the time, enjoy hunky Jesuses, run bay to breakers in a costume
Clara Gold@Clara_Gold

6 months ago, I moved to San Francisco. It’s the best place in the world to build, and one of the worst places to stay human. My unfiltered take: 1. SF is both overhyped and underrated The overhyped part: there are a lot of people with incredible resumes who are deeply unimpressive in real life. They were at the right company, at the right time, in the right market, and got carried by the wave. They made money, got comfortable, and now spend their time “exploring opportunities” over coffee, wasting your time. The underrated part: the top 1% here is insane. But almost impossible to get. Hiring in SF feels like being a guy on a dating app: everyone you want is out of your league, and everyone in your league wants someone out of theirs. The best people have unmatchable packages, endless options, and are optimizing for maximum impact: labs, frontier companies, or startups raising $100M pre-seed rounds. If you raised $10M from Tier 1 investors, you’re not hot shit here. You’re a B-player. It’s humbling. 2. There are fewer mission-driven people than I expected Especially on the application layer. A lot of people are in “secure the bag before it’s too late” mode. And honestly, it gives me the ick. The real religious builders I’ve met are often in labs, hardware, biotech, deeptech, defense — places where the work is hard enough that you can’t fake obsession. 3. The status game favors builders This is what SF does better than anywhere else. It rewards obsession. It rewards weirdness. It rewards people who make building their entire personality. Europe punishes that. SF gives it status. If you’ve felt like an outsider your whole life because you care too much, work too much, think too radically, or refuse to be chill about things that matter, this city will make you feel less insane. 4. The market liquidity is absurd Even if you don’t build a billion-dollar company, if you manage to build a strong product with a great team, someone smart might still acquire you for $ 100M. Yeah I know, it’s not your dream outcome as a founder, but on the days you feel desperate, it helps to keep going. 5. SF does not care about the meaning crisis that’s coming Anyone paying attention here can feel that something massive is happening with AI. But I’m shocked by how little people talk about the meaning crisis coming next. Everyone wants to talk about AI liberating humanity. Almost no one wants to talk about what happens when work — the thing that gives most people identity, structure, dignity, status, and purpose — starts disappearing. The vacuum will not be peaceful. People are underestimating the chaos that comes from humans suddenly having no idea why they matter. And I really feel like no one cares. 6. Personally, I’ve never been more unhappy I moved to SF and entered the matrix. I’ve always been intense. I’ve always worked crazy hours. But here, I lost the last parts of myself that were not about building. I don’t go to events. Most networking events feel like theater for people pretending to be important. The only events worth going to are small, curated dinners with people who are actually alive. I’ve made 0 real friends. I don’t do well with transactionality. I don’t do well with people constantly performing greatness. I don’t do well with rooms where everyone is optimizing and no one is being honest. So yes, SF is lonely, transactional, delusional, addictive, inspiring, boring, extraordinary, and completely insane. But it is still the only place to be right now if you’re a founder trying to build the next wave of humanity. And for now, that’s enough.

English
1
0
0
225
Captain Insight
Captain Insight@CaptainInsightX·
4 engineers who shaped modern software. You get 1 as your mentor for a year. Pick one. -DHH (creator of Ruby on Rails, CTO of 37signals) -John Carmack (creator of Doom, ex-CTO Oculus) -Linus Torvalds (creator of Linux & Git) -Guillermo Rauch (CEO of Vercel, creator of Next.js) Who are you picking, and why?
English
216
8
407
94.5K
w h i t
w h i t@whit·
subagent master class
w h i t tweet media
English
0
0
0
28