Who Discuss!

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid …but why is filling the gaps yourself an option because it makes no sense? You have no idea if you’re going to get the right meaning that they were going for.

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid I'm sorry for lashing out at you. It's open to interpretation exactly because it wasn't specified what his true meaning was. You can't just say "Im repulsed by celebrating death" when it's justifiable to celebrate the death of someone who caused the death of millions.

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid That’s alright. What I was asking about originally was what is the junction between a person not specifying their true meaning and it being open for interpretation? Why does one beget the other? Because you can just either ask for specifics or accept you don’t know the full thing

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid People can have questions about explanations, ask for further. In this case you explained that if someone doesn't specify it becomes open to interpretation so I asked why that was. It's just a logical next step to me. We're all different, other people getting it doesn't mean I do

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Not upset, annoyed...And I explained my position already and you just keep coming with BS...Others seem to agree so not sure why it's so hard for you?

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid I honestly did not mean to annoy you either, I am really sorry it came across this way. Yes I get that you explained your position already, but I had questions about your explanation. I mean surely you don't think that once you explain something, that's it? (1/)

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid I’m very sorry to have upset you, but how do I not have a point? I’ve been making a point over these posts. So what’s wrong with what I have been saying over these posts about interpretation? I’m not acting smarter than I am, or at least that’s not my intention at all.

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Because you never had a fucking point to begin with now fuck off and stop acting like you are smarter than you really are....

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Sorry, I’m a little confused as to how it was irrelevant? You’d said that without him specifying it was up for interpretation and the rest of my post was me responding to and asking further about that. So surely that’s extremely relevant as it’s directly responding to you?

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Because the rest was irrelevant...

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid You’ve just ignored the rest of my post which is about 80% of it to say that. That wasn’t even the bit most related to what we’re talking about.

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Apparently you don't know what words mean because coming to his defense is exactly what you did....But keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better...

@mrkphllps1 Are you saying the source here is blaming the actor? Because I don’t see how you’re coming to that conclusion, it doesn’t say that.

Imagine blaming the actor rather than the material she was given to work with... #EastEnders

@DebatingDavid @CurseofConform @seanonolennon So I understand the concept of implication but I’m saying it’s wrong to come at people for an implication you’ve taken from what they said because that doesn’t mean that they meant that. Why should you get to come up with what they mean if it isn’t explicitly said?

The concept of implication is beyond your grasp? If I post “good riddance” on the day the president is assassinated and was criticized for enjoying it. Would you find it acceptable for me to say “find where I specifically said I enjoyed it”? Even if I truly was referencing something else.. you don’t understand the implications in the specific context? You must not have kids or are clearly still one.. “I didn’t say a million dollars.. I said a million doll hairs” type energy. #BeBetter

@DebatingDavid @CurseofConform @seanonolennon See there’s a difference between saying it’s good to be rid of the president and saying you enjoy that he was assassinated. Because you can be relieved he’s gone but wish it was in a more humane way etc. So yes you should get to say “find me where…”. (1)

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid I’ve never said “in defence of” or “I agree with” so once again you’re taking implications. If someone doesn’t specify why should it be open to interpretation? Either you can ask them to specify or just accept you don’t know the specifics. But why should you get to fill the gaps?

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid It's basically what he said and since he didn't specify it's open to interpretation...Stop defending a Nepo Baby just cause you like him...Or maybe you feel the same and it made you realize you would have mourned Hitler as well, lol...

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid But you stated that he said it. Not that you took an implication yourself. That’s not something he’s done. And it doesn’t have to happen. You don’t have to take implications that aren’t there.

@WhoDiscuss @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Yeah...It was implied...That's what happens when you make a broad statement like that...

@CurseofConform @seanonolennon @DebatingDavid Nowhere did he say “when hitler died he should’ve been mourned”. I don’t see those words anywhere. That seems to be an implication you’re taking.

@seanonolennon @DebatingDavid You just did...

@DebatingDavid @seanonolennon @Nu20Beauty Implications are something other people take, not something he gives. Therefore they are not his problem.

@seanonolennon @Nu20Beauty Seán doesn’t understand the concept of *implication*.

@lasagneinmyshoe I’m sorry I did not mean to cause that at all but I’m really not sure how speaking with me is quite annoying.

@WhoDiscuss I don't really enjoy speaking with you it's quite annoying

People suggesting Zoe is the person Max gets arrested for 'killing' in the flash forward - well no because she's left very abruptly and this exit wasn't planned. If it does turn out to be Zoe then it proves the flash forward was loosely/poorly thought out with no actual plot

@lasagneinmyshoe That would be proper evidence but again all of this tells us nothing about when the Zoe decision was made

@WhoDiscuss I read it somewhere AS WELL

@lasagneinmyshoe And again even if it was a fact, that tells you nothing about when the Zoe decision was made.

@WhoDiscuss Let me see - he was in flash forward - when do you think they filmed that? The week before? They stop filming mid December for Christmas break and by that time they have usually filmed episodes for March. Never mind that I actually read he joined in October it's fucking logic

@realseanslater @lasagneinmyshoe What? What on earth would you say that for? Of course I wasn’t.

@WhoDiscuss @lasagneinmyshoe Were you dropped on the head as a kid or sum

@Linda_Bell @Kfastlove @RyanSoapKing25 I did yes and I stand corrected, my apologies. You also stand corrected though like I said about the 3 units being normal thing. And therefore I stand by what I said about it should be acceptable to have one pint and drive (because you would be at the limit not over it)

@WhoDiscuss @Kfastlove @RyanSoapKing25 But you said most were under two........

#EastEnders Yeah why should Ian plead guilty when what happened to Jordan was a tragic accident? Yes there's a chance Ian could get suspended sentence if he pleads guilty and if he doesn't he won't go to trial because of the CPS but still how was Ian meant to know he'd be over the limit? 👀 Yes he could've checked to see what he'd hit but Chelsea is most at fault for shouting at Jordan in the first place even if it was just one lapse in judgement from Chelsea.