j
5.5K posts


@SpencerHakimian It this was real the guy would’ve been shot dead on the spot in two seconds. This is ridiculous.
English

@stoolpresidente @BizNasty2point0 You need to start with the original call on the ice. No ref clearly saw that the puck crossed the goal line and they are not allowed to use video assist in determining the on ice call of a goal or not. They should've originally ruled it no goal and then go to Toronto.
English

@KingsleyPM @HustleBitch_ @TJay0543 They waited for the police to get in their position for the photos before they started moving Trump 🤣🤣. If this were a real situation, the panicking would’ve been off the charts. This is just a scene from a low budget movie.
English


@ScottsOnAir You can’t call a goal on the ice if you literally did not see it go in.
English

No ref behind the goal, how in the world was this called a goal on the ice? You call it No Goal and then review it, not the other way around...
@
THE DUCKS WIN GAME 4 AFTER A LENGTHY REVIEW
English

@patrickbetdavid @jimmykimmel Was Jimmy’s joke in bad taste? For sure. People are all up in arms over what a comedian says yet people forget that Trump disbanded USAID which led to probably at least 200,000 children needlessly dying so far. But hey they're not American so who cares, right?
English

Hey @jimmykimmel, what is funny about this?
Joking is one thing, but wishing death on the President by telling Melania “Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow”?
That’s not comedy, that’s dangerous rhetoric.
We’re better than this.
English

@ryanwhitney6 @spittinchiclets It should never make sense to you. You can't call a goal on the ice if you literally did not see it go in. And if he saw it go in, he would've pointed signifying a goal. That was crazy.
English

@UKhoops1_BBN @Sportsnet Yeah but the ref never clearly saw the puck crossing the goal line or he would've called it a goal. You can't call a goal on the ice if you literally did not see it go in.
English

@WickedSlapper @Sportsnet But after review they said puck completely crossed the line. So they confirmed the call.
They didn't say call on the ice stands. So if it would been no goal on the ice then reviewed it would of been overturned then
English

@BarDown I can't even get that far. EDM got screwed because the ref never pointed signifying a goal nor blew the whistle for losing sight of the puck. How could you call a good goal on the ice then? And that video review wouldn't have overturned the call on the ice of no goal.
English

@loganj2997 @DailyFaceoff He was so clueless back there. He fucked up. I'm a pens fan by the way, no bias
English


@KDPomp The ref never pointed signifying a goal and never blew the whistle because he lost sight of the puck. So shouldn't it be one or the other? Therefore it should've been called no goal on the ice and then reviewed. And they likely would've stuck with the call of no goal. Just imo.
English

@Chicago_J32 @spittinchiclets EDM got screwed. The ref never pointed signifying a goal and never blew the whistle because he lost sight of the puck. So shouldn't it be one or the other? Therefore it should've been called no goal on the ice and then reviewed. And they would've stuck with the call of no goal.
English

@spittinchiclets @BizNasty2point0 EDM got screwed. The ref never pointed signifying a goal and never blew the whistle because he lost sight of the puck. So shouldn't it be one or the other? Therefore it should've been called no goal on the ice and then reviewed. And they would've stuck with the call of no goal.
English

@EdmontonOilers @sentinelstorage EDM got screwed. The ref never pointed signifying a goal and never blew the whistle because he lost sight of the puck. So shouldn't it be one or the other? Therefore it should've been called no goal on the ice and then reviewed. And they would've stuck with the call of no goal.
English


@ryanwhitney6 @spittinchiclets EDM got screwed. The ref never pointed signifying a goal and never blew the whistle because he lost sight of the puck. So shouldn't it be one or the other? Therefore it should've been called no goal on the ice and then reviewed. And they would've stuck with the call of no goal.
English

@MeghanMcCain Yeah he's a comedian. Was this in poor taste? Absolutely. But think about Trump and Musk disbanding USAID which most likely has already led to at least 200,000 children dying. But OK, let's get all up in arms over Jimmy Kimmel. Get some perspective.
English

I am so deeply sick of Jimmy Kimmel and the hate he spreads in the world.
@
Jimmy Kimmel delivered a fake White House Correspondents Dinner speech, saying "Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow."
English

@BizNasty2point0 They freaking switched to the next game and I missed the goal. Nice.
English



















