big guy retweetledi
This story of the review PR in claude code
> Identified critical ci error there is double .exe in the generated artifact
> fix it
> There is no double .exe bug here. The review was wrong on that point
> -$15
English
big guy
411 posts
@claudeai Impressive but none of this is really new.
If only there was a way we could run applications as servers during development to see how our code is holding up .... wait, that's just like, how development works.
More fear mongering + prolonging the bubble. Zzz
English
@onmoron1 @YanikStudios @Loomopolis @st4rcannon And that inspiration is part of why art becomes good. An actor or director or artist or musician being so inspired by a piece of work as a child or going through something that they then pursue said artform makes that inspired art much more meaningful than AI's predictive slop
English
@WinterSoldier92 @YanikStudios @Loomopolis @st4rcannon Not every artist makes new things out of the blue. They get inspired by other artists' works, just like Ai does
English
what did artists do to deserve this genuinely
˚⊱ MNDZ ⊰˚@Darkorikes3
اذا الرامات اختفت لأجل ذا المقطع انا راضي
English
@HromDrom @Loomopolis @st4rcannon And they can only mimic it because the animators took so much money and time. If they never made Arcane this video would be in the style of Spider-Verse or Illumination or Pixar because they guy said 'make it like this'
AI isn't creating or doing anything impressive here
English
@Loomopolis @st4rcannon This worked maybe like a year ago, this is objectively better than what vast majority of animators could achieve for fraction of the time.
Arcane took so much money and time the second season even flopped financially last I checked, now every shitposter can mimic it in minutes.
English
big guy retweetledi
LOL anyone who has ever watched a martial arts movie knows this is absolutely dogshit
FearBuck@FearedBuck
An AI-generated video of Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise fighting in a rooftop is going viral, with people saying AI is getting too realistic
English
@ishaansehgal All the bots in the comments. Good code is here to stay forever. Ai will fall over in a heap. Good luck peddling the next snake oil
English
Talked with a senior engineer who's been coding for 15 years. Loved the craft, mentored juniors, built systems from scratch.
Just quit.
Here's what broke him:
His entire job became prompting AI and reviewing generated code. The actual engineering, the part he loved, disappeared.
English
@yellowmelondev @ishaansehgal I mean not really. Them guys still know more than the hallucinationary shite from AI
English
@ishaansehgal I know people whose whole career identity - somewhat - is built around their extreme technical knowledge of languages and frameworks; knowledge that has been built over the course of decades. Crazy to me that in the space of a month all of it has become basically irrelevant now.
English
@TheJennyAI @kimmonismus When the guy with the highest stakes in the shit race says that his shit is winning, it's not hype. It's a warning that the world is changing.
Yeah sure
English
@kimmonismus "50% chance in 2-3 years"
When the co-founder of Anthropic gives a timeline like this, it's not hype.
It's a warning to start adapting now.
English
I I would give anything to know what they saw internally at Anthropic.
Anthropic Karplan says there is a 50% that in 2-3 years physicists will be replaced by AI
Natalie Wolchover@nattyover
Anthropic co-founder Jared Kaplan had this to say about the future of physics research. A bold claim that I might not take as seriously if Kaplan wasn’t such a brilliant physicist before he left the field for AI:
English
the technology has hit a dead end. it hasn't meaningfully changed in 3 years. it's just as inaccurate. it's maximum potential is personal use and despite every dollar and unit of energy (human and physical) going into it in those years, only 12% of people report using it daily
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart
@theshadowofbong Everyone needs to seek truth from facts here. This was @edzitron's argument last year, that the tech was hitting a dead end. Don't lie about the extent of the argument.
English
@meo_joule @podzied @naval And then it spits out more slop, breaks more shit, rinse and repeat until your codebase is in ruins
English
English
@ShanuMathew93 AGI will never be a thing. Machines will never think like humans and that's it
English
Um, guys - starting to get a little worried here
Shane Legg@ShaneLegg
AGI is now on the horizon and it will deeply transform many things, including the economy. I'm currently looking to hire a Senior Economist, reporting directly to me, to lead a small team investigating post-AGI economics. Job spec and application here: job-boards.greenhouse.io/deepmind/jobs/…
English
@AndrewCurioso This is just the start of 2026. Just wait 6–8 months more.
English
@GeorgeMayer @deepfates This is absolute nonsense and grift. There is no single way an org of anthropics scale developed, tested and released a production application that isn't a todo list in a week and a half.
Either this is slop that doesn't work at all. Or they're being paid to hype Claude code.
English
@yoobinray I'm still going to be a software engineer because it will still be a lucrative career...
English
@Mortimyrrhh @eridanus_dev @yoobinray Long way = never. The world will always need good software engineers. AI bubble has hit its peak and AGI isn't possible and AI isn't going to learn much more
English
@eridanus_dev @yoobinray Long way = about 3 years imo, which will be a fast and insane 3 years that are essentially impossible to plan for
English