Witold Repetowicz

Our response to Israel's attack on our infrastructure employed FRACTION of our power. The ONLY reason for restraint was respect for requested de-escalation. ZERO restraint if our infrastructures are struck again. Any end to this war must address damage to our civilian sites.

WASHINGTON, March 19 (Reuters) - The U.S. may soon remove sanctions from Iranian oil that is stranded on tankers to help lift global supplies and reduce prices, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday.

Bolton: If Europe says Iran is not its war, Trump could respond that Ukraine is not America’s war. That rhetoric risks weakening transatlantic support and could shift US commitments at a critical moment for European allies. 1/

The U.S. is ready to draw closer to Russia to weaken China — Politico The Trump administration is considering reshaping its relationship with Russia to reduce China's influence. The White House believes that encouraging Russia to end the war in Ukraine and reintegrating it into economic cooperation with the West could shift the global balance of power in favor of the U.S. Economic incentives and investments are being discussed as ways to bring Moscow closer to Washington. However, in Ukraine and among experts, this strategy is met with skepticism, with reminders that similar attempts in the past have been unsuccessful, and the Russia-China alliance remains strong. Experts believe that at best, limited cooperation can be expected, but not a rupture between Moscow and Beijing.

BREAKING Trump threatens to destroy Iran's key South Pars gas field if there are further attacks against Qatar's main gas plant. Trump says on Truth Social that Israel had struck the South Pars field but says the US "knew nothing" of the attack, which spurred Iran to launch an attack on Qatar's Ras Laffan facility

BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Israeli Haaretz reports that Trump has decided to go to the end in his war with the regime in Iran until it falls He no longer listens to the advice of his advisors, and difficult days are coming for the world.

WATCH: After stating that the assessment of the Intelligence Community (IC) is that “Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated” by last year’s airstrikes, DNI Tulsi Gabbard repeatedly refuses to say whether it was the IC’s asessment that Iran posed an “imminent nuclear threat” as of March 1, 2026, as claimed by the White House. “It is not the Intelligence Community’s responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat,” she says. Sen. Jon Ossoff: “This is the ‘Worldwide Threats’ hearing... You are here to represent the IC’s ‘assessment of threats.’ That’s a quote from your own opening statement...”

GOP Rep. Don Bacon: If he broke up NATO on his own, it would be a civil war in the Republican conference. Most of us would find that totally unacceptable...it would probably destroy the party for many years. There would be many that will never forgive that.

I'm here with Israel's Defense Minister, our Chief of Staff, the head of the Mossad, the Chief of Air Force, our senior commanders. In the past 24 hours, we knocked out two of the terrorist chieftains, the top terrorist chieftains of this tyranny. Our aircraft are hitting the terror operatives on the grounds, in the crossroads, in the city squares. This is meant to enable the brave people of Iran to celebrate the Festival of Fire. So celebrate and Happy Nowruz. We're watching from above.

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi: We have no hesitation about giving our lives.

„Uważaliśmy Witkoffa i Kushnera za izraelskie wtyczki/agentów, którzy wciągają prezydenta w wojnę, której on chce uniknąć". The Guardian wypuścił dzisiaj ważny tekst. Okazuje się, że Brytyjczycy brali udział w negocjacjach USA-Iran. Byli obecni podczas rozmów w Genewie 26 lutego, na 2 dni przed wybuchem wojny. Brytyjską delegacją kierował Jonathan Powell, wieloletni współpracownik Tony'ego Blaira, a obecnie doradca premiera Keira Starmera ds. bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Brytyjczycy wyjeżdżali z Genewy z przekonaniem, że oferta złożona przez Irańczyków jest na tyle poważna, że wystarczy aby uniknąć wojny. Brytyjczycy uważali, że drzwi dla dyplomacji pozostają otwarte, a Iran nie stanowi bezpośredniego zagrożenia dla USA. Finałowa propozycja Iranu miała zawierać wstrzymanie wzbogacania uranu na 3-5 lat i dopuszczenie USA do udziału w irańskim programie nuklearnym, a także inne gospodarcze korzyści dla Amerykanów. Obecność Brytyjczyków podczas rozmów USA-Iran tłumaczy dlaczego premier Starmer tak niechętnie podchodzi do pomocy USA w tej wojnie. Londyn zwyczajnie czuje się oszukany przez Amerykanów. Opinia o Witkoffie i Kushnerze jako izraelskich "aktywach" to ocena jednego z dyplomatów, który rozmawiał z dziennikarzami The Guardian.