Daniel

@Seamus_Donohue There was no newer StaticDatabaseDump available at fuzzwork.co.uk/dump/ I guess it will be available soon ... I hope

@Seamus_Donohue I'm back home. I've updated the SDE on Evemaps and updated the 2 regional maps

@Seamus_Donohue Thanks for the heads up. I’ll see to get it fixed asap

@NoganaSiniy Thanks. I fixed it already yesterday. That happens when you update things in a hurry (new gates)

@Wollari i.e. #alt" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">evemaps.dotlan.net/map/Pure_Blind… and switching to any other representation in the dropdown.

@Wollari there seems to be something wrong with the per-region JS, e.g. /js/Pure_Blind.js returns HTML

@Chris_Barker Oha. Looks like I’ve to update the code. Thanks for the heads up

@hyprviper1 My statistics only contains numbers. What exactly are you looking for?

@Wollari Hey i was wondring. Is there a place where you have the historical alliance character population lists ? I saw the statistics section on dotlan but it doesn't show the end points for the data besides the graph.

@eXeler0n Thanks for the heads up. I heard rumors already, but we need to wait until we know exactly which new routes will appear. I guess it’s an event to restore the old jita <> amarr route

@Fuzzysteve I forgot the fact already, since I’m not really active. But it looks like not everybody is happy about it. Well ... we’ll see. Are the remaining belts real belts or dead spots as well?

@Wollari :D Just added it as I've seen people asking already.

I've updated the database/SDE on DOTLAN EveMaps. CCP has removed 14k old static asteroid belts in the nullsec regions. Here is what it looks before/after in Catch with the belts map overlay #eveonline #tweetfleet

@Fuzzysteve You’re right. I just wanted to provide the info, before people ask If the maps are broken ;-)

@Wollari To clarify for people who are unaware, the removed belts are those which were empty, due to the asteroid rebalance a while back. Nothing would spawn in them. It's just useless points in space gone.

@hanskolba Sorry for the delay, fixed it

@hanskolba I’ll take a look later when the kids are in bed.

@finfleet I just added an overlay option "Sov Alternative Colors" with colors assigned by number of systems held ... this way you've something to choose

@finfleet The colors are selected by order of appearance in the map history (to be consistent over time). In the case between test and goons hmmm. I've tried to better seperate some colors. We'll see if I create more color conflicts now

@Wollari hey bud, any chance you could change colour on test on the delve part of dotlan it's impossible to see between Test and Goons in Delve.. thanks in advance

@Banlish I changed it. As said the color is assigned by order of appearance in the map history. I've not added a detection when duplicate colors are used, the alliance with less systems held gets a temporary color until the color conflict has been solved. We'll see how this goes

@Wollari I know database changes can be highly disruptive in certain ways, I just wanted to bring it to your attention since I know many like me check dotlan only, even before reddit. No politics, no drama, just raw data that tells the facts. It's why after 4+ yrs off I still check u 1st

@Wollari I love your work man, even 4 years after leaving EVE I still check it daily as a 'quick update' for myself. I'm not sure anyone has told you, but in the Delve war for whatever reason, to many alliances have the same color on the sov map. Case in point Can you change it?

All DOTLAN services are back online. The network switch in the datacenter Rack died during night

@Banlish I’ve to take a look into in when I get a free minute. Maybe the younger alliances which has a color conflict should get temporary different one. But that could lead to flipping colors for some ... I don’t want to assign colors it manually

@Barkkor @eXeler0n @dotlan Ich gebe mein Möglichstes.

@eXeler0n @dotlan Ausschließlich dotlan. Ich wäre mit der ingame Map komplett aufgeschmissen, sollte dotlan mal nicht erreichbar sein, oder gar offline gehen. @Wollari wird das geniale Tool hoffentlich noch lange am laufen halten.

@Ragnarork I can't replicate your issue. Neither with chrome, nor with firefox.