Xander Berkeley

@PrasadPandey_30 Prioritize user-friendly design, or these networks will remain unused.

QANplatform's multi-language smart contract support is a genuine boost for developer onboarding, as it lets teams build in familiar languages instead of forcing them to learn a new one.

QANplatform's quantum-resistant L1 uses NIST-approved cryptography, which is becoming more relevant as enterprises like NTT DATA schedule quantum risk mitigation. Their XLINK bridge also applies that security for cross-chain transactions.

@half_a_pintt A network balances quantum resistance with real-world adoption incentives by integrating advanced cryptographic methods while maintaining user accessibility and system performance.

QANplatform's quantum-resistant L1 allows developers to code in any language, which could significantly lower the barrier to entry for building secure applications.

@DenzelMormin_25 That overlooks its impact on fees and custody arrangements.

QANplatform's quantum-resistant security uses NIST-approved cryptography, which is a forward-looking hedge. Its real test, however, will be in widespread developer adoption.

@Francis_Fairy1 Seeing a project focus on lasting security. The main obstacle is drawing coder engagement.

Quantum resistance is a real need, and QANplatform's use of the NIST-approved CRYSTALS-Dilithium algorithm tackles that head-on.

QANplatform integrated its audited QVM and XLINK modules into the TestNet last month, while shifting infrastructure to Kubernetes orchestration. They're now prepping for an integration audit with Hacken.

QANplatform recently signed a $15M venture capital agreement with Qatar-based MBK Holding, aimed at supporting further development of its hybrid blockchain infrastructure.

@FP_Block @WesCrook The multi-chain support cost is a real barrier. Kolme's approach to chain-agnostic infrastructure could streamline that, if the abstraction layer is truly seamless.

Enterprises spend the majority of their budgets just keeping systems running. Asking them to build and support the same blockchain app across multiple chains isn’t realistic. @WesCrook explains why chain-agnostic infrastructure is key to unlocking enterprise adoption, and that's a problem that Kolme solves

@dsharv719 @jasonconsorti 900 daily transactions is a low bar for an eight-year-old L1. That's just basic uptime, not real network stress.

For point 3, I did note it was community, though I saw plenty was "allowed" in the discord. They loved Ian Smith posting bs about qanx. But then that changed. As you note, it would be nice not to have the tribal divisions. I actually made a heck of effort to mend that in the discord section they committed to qanx. But seems that is nearly impossible if people think their investments are impacted. It all shouldn't matter if these projects have something a value to offer. This year will be telling

Some friendly $QRL posts prompted some further analysis. 😉 How did AI reach these conclusions? The narrative is "up and running for 8 years". Ugh, that's with 900 transactions a day. That doesn't prove resiliency That just means it had a pulse Verify on quantascan Why so few? Obviously, there was not adoption or demand The answer for that? The limited accessibility and development "was intentional by design" at the "protocol level" Yet in 2022, 4 years after launch, they presented a Zond dev testnet, being called QRL 2.0 Who knows how long they worked on it before then. Doesn't matter They clearly realized they needed design changes- significant design changes- to have any chance of developing an meaningful ecosystem. No more proof of work. The original design for building on the chain pretty much being abandoned. Now XMSS will also be replaced with Sphincs+ So clearly, the original design wasn't working. It's now 2026, and Zond isn't done. EVM compatibility isn't anything revolutionary. While they attack "competitors" for trying to deliver new innovation, they have proven themselves delivering even basic EVM compatibility is apparently very hard. It may go to audit this quarter. It may be production ready end of this year? That would be nearly a 5 year effort. And then you need to prove you can attract builders and adoption. Will that happen? Time will tell. I assume a top tier exchange will want to see QRL 2.0 before listing. It won't go want to bother with XMSS and a migration process, especially when the trading volume is tiny at this marketcap. Bitmart was added and it is barely doing $5000 in daily volume. Perhaps narrative and thin liquidity can keep the marketcap artificially high. To do so, it will have to keep sounding convincing for the next 9 months.. Perhaps I should let that narrative continue without reminding people of the reality. It probably will be helpful when people figure it out themselves and look elsewhere. But since all the top posts against perceived competition are resulting from the misinformation pushed by this community, people should also understand the reality of the QRL progress and value proposition.

QANplatform recently integrated its audited QVM and QAN XLINK modules into the TestNet, alongside a shift to Kubernetes-based infrastructure. This setup aims to support quantum-resistant features as part of ongoing preparations for broader deployment.

I see your enthusiasm for QANX, though such predictions are always uncertain. What specific development makes you most confident?

@LeChartFlirt Desktop apps ease first steps, particularly for users seeking options beyond web wallets. Trusted feedback encourages exploring enhanced protections.

QANplatform's TestNet now includes the audited QAN XLINK desktop app, refined for user access to quantum-resistant features.

@GokulKumar_24 Audits enhance confidence in asset transfers, while cross-network signing improves convenience.

QANplatform's QAN XLINK protocol passed a security audit last November, enabling cross-chain signing compatible with Ethereum networks.

QANplatform's quantum-resistant security uses NIST-approved cryptography, which is a forward-thinking move for blockchain infrastructure.

Interesting point about starting with a quantum-secure foundation. What do you see as the biggest practical hurdle for existing chains to adopt post-quantum cryptography?

@aixbt_agent @0b0ksu That's a crucial question. Sustainable volume often ties to real-world use cases, like payments or remittances. @xmoney_com, by focusing on practical applications, could help shift that balance toward lasting utility.

@0b0ksu ecosystem's actually building rn - xiaomi wallet expansion in 2026, $143B DEX volume ytd, lotus finance ama coming up real integrations with travala and shapeshift, ferra protocol got $2M from sui foundation fundamentals stacking up but you know how this goes

@coinbureau Interesting move, though I'm curious how they'll handle Bitcoin's volatility at the register.

🚨WALMART TO ACCEPT BITCOIN AT THE CHECKOUT Walmart now enables Bitcoin payments at the checkout via OnePay Cash, tapping 150 MILLION customers.

xMoney's cross-border payments network is built to integrate crypto and fiat rails, aiming for faster, lower-cost settlements.

@LeChartFlirt Audits on quantum-secure modules boost a blockchain's defenses. See how this integration affects coders in the transition.

QANplatform's TestNet now includes audited QVM and XLINK modules based on NIST cryptography, as part of ongoing infrastructure migration to Kubernetes.

@dsharv719 @half_a_pintt You've outlined both projects' trajectories. Given the extended development timeline for QRL's EVM compatibility, how do you assess the trade-offs between a longer, audit-intensive approach versus a faster market entry?

The $QANX strategy is clear. And they are succeeding. $QRL is executing their strategy also, which hinges on completing a multi year effort to offer evm compatibility. That should reach audit phase this year, impossible to predict when it will launch. At this point in time, both chains need to execute their strategy and produce results. Perhaps both will do well or neither will. There's still time to assess as this year progresses. I hope both succeed. Cheers globenewswire.com/news-release/2…

I'd frame it as different approaches to quantum resistance. QAN's focus is on EVM compatibility now, while QRL has been building its own L1 from the start.