X

4.4K posts

X banner
X

X

@XerifiedNobody

uh oh, look who just showed up.

Minnesota, USA Katılım Şubat 2023
1 Takip Edilen50 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
2MSCMXCINV8
0
0
1
3.8K
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@hayasaka_aryan they gave their life for a complete Will Stancil victory. Kirk got mirked by gun violence and Israel and became a meme.
English
0
0
0
101
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@swamp_ist woah a Hollywood movie was mostly fictional ???
English
0
0
6
1.8K
Yung Entrepreneur
Yung Entrepreneur@goofygray·
@XerifiedNobody @plzbepatient This is the funniest reply I’ve read to this. You say this without a hint of irony. Surely if the democrats would sweep all midterms, then they would have unanimously supported the SAVE act. Reddit has cooked liberal brains
English
4
0
2
441
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@jacobus_sa @plzbepatient ah, now it’s “related” to verifying citizenship so giving the Feds even more personal information is okay. at least this is a cowardly way to admit you were wrong, but it’s an admission nonetheless.
English
1
0
2
40
JacobusDavidSA
JacobusDavidSA@jacobus_sa·
@XerifiedNobody @plzbepatient Again, everything you're opposing is related to verifying citizenship where states have failed to do so, and the reason you're panicking is obvious
English
1
0
1
29
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@jacobus_sa @plzbepatient lmao, when did I say Trump would run in 2026? that doesn’t make any sense. learn to read. federalizing in this context means that it gives the Federal Government much more power over state elections than before. for example, handing over voter databases to DHS.
English
1
0
0
40
JacobusDavidSA
JacobusDavidSA@jacobus_sa·
@XerifiedNobody @plzbepatient You're going off on a tangent. How does the Save Act "federtalize" the elections to such a degree that Trump gets to run again in 2026, as you falsely claim. All you've posted is proof of citizenship requirements--WHICH IS PRECISELY THE AIM OF BILL
English
1
0
0
37
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@jacobus_sa @plzbepatient oh my god, do you think “federalizing” elections just means that the federal government would run all of the elections?
English
1
0
0
56
JacobusDavidSA
JacobusDavidSA@jacobus_sa·
@XerifiedNobody @plzbepatient These are all proof of citizenship requirements (which you oppose for obvious reasons). But none this shows where the electionsa re being "federalized" and how it would let Trump run in 2026. You're full of shit
English
1
0
0
67
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@jacobus_sa @plzbepatient I did back up my claims. you chose to move the goalpost to the legal statues in the actual bill which I guess I can provide if you are too dumb or lazy to understand for yourself:
X tweet mediaX tweet mediaX tweet mediaX tweet media
English
1
0
1
65
JacobusDavidSA
JacobusDavidSA@jacobus_sa·
@XerifiedNobody @plzbepatient No, you are unable to quote any part of the Save Act, other than the ID requriement, that "federalizes the elections" to such a degree that Trump would be able to run again, as you falsely claim. And it's your job to back up your claims, not mine
English
1
0
0
64
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@HankShedwrecker @ImHereToHateOn @plzbepatient this is no longer true when it comes to their voting electorate. educated and wealthy suburban families are trending bluer every year while the drug-addled deviants are now Trump supporters.
English
2
0
7
252
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@Takesfordays @plzbepatient cool man, you’re agreeing with me. a flat law that required passports to vote would benefit Democrats.
English
1
0
14
206
X
X@XerifiedNobody·
@Takesfordays @plzbepatient a higher percentage of latinos have a passport than whites, for obvious reasons. especially more so when you reduce to Trump voting whites.
English
1
0
23
678
DH
DH@Takesfordays·
@XerifiedNobody @plzbepatient It’s delusional to pretend that the entire dem party is composed of UMC Whites living in the Acela corridor. How many blacks have a passport? How many Latinos?
English
2
0
8
821