Sabitlenmiş Tweet
"There is no Persian forest or plain without Kurds. They have countless cavalry and warriors who appear when necessary."
The face of the Earth
Book by Ibn Hawqal 977 AD
English
𐬑𐬴𐬀𐬚𐬭𐬀𐬊 𐬔𐬎𐬭𐬛
7K posts
𐬑𐬴𐬀𐬚𐬭𐬀𐬊 𐬔𐬎𐬭𐬛
@XusrawGurd
Lar , Lur , Kalhur , Goran , Kurmanj Hormuz → Anadolu History, Geography, Tech, Politic
KURDISTAN, Shiraz Katılım Ocak 2022
995 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
@AadNauras New Farsi Language was made by samanid & Turkmen powers
Og language of Persia region was pahlawi like media region or kurdish lori larso deletcs
English
@XusrawGurd In fact, the name Manaea in the map is Mandane, named after the mother of Cyrus the Great; the letter d was counted as an a due to circumstances. Iran is a joke. What is Persian now is 80% Arabic. Old Persia was mix of Luri and Laki of Pahlawi.
English
* #Anshan It must have been the aboriginal name of Persis, Parsa.
* since 835 always spelled parsua After the removal of the tribe from Media to the south(elam), between 697 and 660,
𐬑𐬴𐬀𐬚𐬭𐬀𐬊 𐬔𐬎𐬭𐬛@XusrawGurd
Elamite cuneiform then took a course of its own, and at a point not yet exactly fixed, the later old-Persian cuneiform must have branched off from it. IRAN IN THE ANCIENT EAST by ERNST E. HERZFELD
English
@XusrawGurd خوای گەورە کوردستان بپارێزێت
x.com/zr_mukhtar/sta…
Zrng Mukhtar زرنگ موختار@Zr_Mukhtar
سروشتی جوان و ڕازاوەی کــوردستان…
CKB
هەر وێنەیەکی جوانی سروشتی کە پۆستی دەکەیت
دەبێتە هۆی تەعریب و ڕاکێشانی گەشتیار و جرجەکانی عێراق
تکایە بڵاوی بکەنەوە بۆ هاوڕێکانتان
هۆشیاری بڵاوبکەنەوە
CKB
«انشان (Anshan) باید نام بومی منطقه پرسیس (Persis) یا همان پارس (Parsa) بوده باشد.»
«از سال ۸۳۵ [پیش از میلاد] همواره به صورت پارسوا (parsua) هجی شده است؛ پس از جابهجایی این قبیله از ماد (Media) به سمت جنوب (عیلام/Elam)، در فاصله سالهای ۶۹۷ تا ۶۶۰ [پیش از میلاد].»
فارسی
«خط میخی عیلامی سپس مسیر خاص خود را در پیش گرفت و در نقطهای که هنوز دقیقاً مشخص نشده است، خط میخی فارسی باستانِ متأخر باید از آن منشعب شده باشد.»
فارسی
Elamite cuneiform then took a course of its own, and at a point not yet exactly fixed, the later old-Persian cuneiform must have branched off from it.
IRAN IN THE ANCIENT EAST by ERNST E. HERZFELD
English
چەپی چەتە چۆن ئەو کلتورە جوانەی کوردەواریان ناشرین کرد هەتا تورک پێت ڕابوێرێ
🇹🇷 𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰰 ÖZNUR@SenTurksun
Dinarlı Cin kavmi TÜRK kızı awq
CKB
𐬑𐬴𐬀𐬚𐬭𐬀𐬊 𐬔𐬎𐬭𐬛 retweetledi
دوای سێ ڕۆژی تر، واتە له 1\4 بەردەست دەبێت ♥️
وەرگێڕی شێوەزارە کوردییەکان
✹سۆرانی
kurmancî✹
✹لوڕی
Zazaki✹
✹هەورامی
#kurdistan
CKB
@XusrawGurd زۆر راستە دەستت خۆشبێت، هەموو گەشتیاریەکان کوردستانیان تیک داوە
CKB
Son Soran miri Mir Muhammed’in heykeli.
Revandız.
Revandız merkezli 1399’da kurulan Soran mirliği, 1514 Çaldıran savaşından sonra Osmanlı devletine bağlanmıştır.
1830 yılında Kürt mirlikleri içerisinde Osmanlı devletine karşı bağımsızlığını ilan eden ilk Kürd mirliğidir.
1835 yılında Osmanlı devleti tarafından dağıtılıp, merkezi otoriteye bağlanmıştır.
Türkçe
@Arin_Dasini Your shex say we are arab so go away don't talk about kurds
English
From a Kurdish perspective he is seen as a hero, while from a Yazidi perspective he must be seen as a bloodthirsty monster. He is one of the greatest criminals and mass murderers of the Yazidis. And then they claim that Yazidis are part of them, yet there is almost no real sense of wrongdoing toward the Yazidis. Usually it comes down to a phrase like this: yes, what he did to them should be condemned, BUT he also rendered great services to the Kurdish cause. To the Kurdish cause. If Yazidis were slaughtered for that, then it clearly shows that Yazidis are apparently not considered part of it.
Mehmet Güzeler (Qurdek)@MehmetGzeler3
Son Soran miri Mir Muhammed’in heykeli. Revandız. Revandız merkezli 1399’da kurulan Soran mirliği, 1514 Çaldıran savaşından sonra Osmanlı devletine bağlanmıştır. 1830 yılında Kürt mirlikleri içerisinde Osmanlı devletine karşı bağımsızlığını ilan eden ilk Kürd mirliğidir. 1835 yılında Osmanlı devleti tarafından dağıtılıp, merkezi otoriteye bağlanmıştır.
English
Okay, if you have this attitude, then you also have to accept Kemal Atatürk and acknowledge that he defended and expanded his empire. At the same time, Kurds shouldn’t criticize Atatürk. You can’t on one hand say, “Yes, he was an evil man who built a country on suffering,” and at the same time do the same thing yourselves and celebrate it. That’s a bit hypocritical and double-minded, right? I’m not trying to defend anyone here, I just want to point out the hypocrisy and double standards.
English
