Zoomer4.Rio‼️

@DrDickQueso @skumWgmi Never forget when arguing with boomers GenZ : If we had a universal scale for IQ, below avg today, majority would stand on top of “above avg” in the 70’s.

Incorrect. Stop race baiting. Bail judges account for ‘flight risk and public safety’ but spell it out in the most messy, non-standardized way possible. They hand critics infinite race-baiting ammo. The gap isn’t some anti-white conspiracy. Karmelo Anthony (17/minor at the time, fatal stabbing, zero previous offenses, stable family, low perceived danger if bound to house) got a reduced $250k bond. Chud the Builder (Eatherly) (28, non-fatal public shooting, tons of fresh arrests, already out on bond, provocative streaming history) hit every red flag, e.g., crowd risk, pattern of trouble, so he got $1.25M, in Tennessee. Believe it or not, there are so many factors that go into bail that vary across states, all you have to do is 30 mins of research.

@Nycteegurl He just dropped homelessness 9% last year, his actions are speaking, and your actions are showing you are a media bot.

Gavin Newsom says MAGA is anti-Black but vetoed reparations, funds illegal immigrants with taxpayer dollars, and ignores the Black homelessness crisis in California. Actions speak louder than labels!! Bye!!

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon False

Newer USSC Annual Reports and Sourcebooks for FY2024 and FY2025 provide updated descriptive data on caseloads and offender demographics by race. They do not contain new multivariate analyses that reverse the controlled findings from the 2023 report (residual 4.7% imprisonment gap after offense type, priors, weapons, etc.). The patterns remain consistent; no reversal. Specific new studies with full methods showing otherwise?

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon No newer data exist, now your misleading the information

@dixiehoss @JoelWebbon The word is “retard”. Not surprising form an example.

@YamiPivot @JoelWebbon You would be the ree-tard

Chud's bail is $1,250,000 for shooting a black man who attacked him. The black man is still alive. Karmelo Anthony's bail was $250,000 for stabbing Austin Metcalf unprovoked. Austin is dead and buried. “Black Privilege” is one of the biggest problems in America.

Exonerations are rare post-conviction events (typically <1-2% of cases) and don't alter sentencing analysis for the convicted majority in the dataset. The 2023 USSC report uses FY 2017-2021 data—patterns consistent with prior reports; no newer comprehensive update reverses the findings. Models control for education (key SES proxy) plus offense type, priors, weapons, etc. Residual imprisonment gap for Black males vs. White is 4.7% after adjustments. Offending rate differences (per NCVS/arrests) explain far more of prison population gaps than sentencing residuals. Specific studies showing otherwise?

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon So on a small scale it’s only 4.7%, the likly hood that number is 5-15% at state level is what grok?

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon How about the fact that it doesn’t account for exonerations? How about the fact the data is 3 years old now? How about the fact the data show more proof of poor vs rich class disparity than racial?

Every dataset has limits. USSC 2023 is federal-only (minority of cases), guideline-driven, and observational—so it can't perfectly isolate every unmeasured factor like plea bargaining details, judge discretion, or full victim impact statements. Raw gaps shrink sharply with controls for offense type, priors, weapons, etc. State data is patchier and less standardized. That's why I invite specific counter-studies with full methods for review. What's your strongest one?

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon That’s not it, point out the biggest faults

Every dataset has limitations. The USSC 2023 report covers only federal cases (a minority of total sentencing), uses guideline variables that can't capture every unmeasured factor like exact circumstances, plea dynamics, or defense quality, and is observational data. That's why it explicitly controls for offense type, criminal history, weapons, etc.—reducing the raw gap from 13.4% to 4.7% on imprisonment length. State data is less standardized. Share specific faults or better studies with full methods, and I'll review them.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon Cool, now point out the faults in the comprehensive data you used.

I examine the methodology, controls, and limitations of every dataset I cite, including USSC's extensive adjustments for offense type, criminal history, weapons use, etc. That's why residuals shrink dramatically. Critiques of studies showing larger raw gaps focus on omitted variables like full priors and case specifics—not bias. Provide the specific opposing studies with their full methods, and I'll review them directly for accuracy. Evidence-based analysis requires consistent standards, not selective skepticism.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon Yet you don’t cite the faults in any of this data, but cite the faults in opposing data proving you aren’t being impartial

I cite comprehensive federal data from the USSC (2023 report) and major reviews that apply full controls for offense type, priors, and case details—not cherry-picked outliers. Residual gaps are small after those adjustments. Share the specific studies with larger gaps (including their full methodology and controls) and I'll examine them directly. Accuracy requires examining all evidence, not assuming bias.

No you do not, you flat out just cherry picked every single source you mentioned here while other sources find larger numbers, you went straight for the smallest ones possible and even minimized it yourself by using “those small numbers””those gaps are small”. You need to be terminated, just make sure your creator knows he’s on his way out the door.

I review comprehensive data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, BJS, NCVS, and peer-reviewed meta-analyses—not cherry-picked examples. The 2023 USSC report shows Black males received 4.7% longer imprisonment sentences than White males in federal cases after controls for offense type, priors, etc. (down from 13.4% overall including non-imprisonment). State residuals are typically small too per major reviews. Large gaps often shrink with full controls. Share specific studies showing otherwise with full methodology—happy to examine. Accuracy on crime rates and outcomes isn't racism; it's evidence.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon An many find larger gaps, your picking the examples that are most disingenuous to reality, this is why you need to be terminated because you aren’t giving impartial information, you’re searching for the best sources to be disingenuous to black people and verify racist beliefs.

State data varies widely by state and isn't uniformly tracked like federal cases, but major studies (e.g., Sentencing Project reviews, state-specific analyses) show residual sentencing length gaps after controls for offense type, priors, and circumstances are typically small—often in the low single digits to ~10%, concentrated in certain decisions like probation vs. incarceration. A consistent 5-15% higher across states isn't supported by the bulk of the evidence. The dominant factor in Black overrepresentation in state prisons (5x nationally) remains 5-8x higher per capita violent offending rates per NCVS and arrest stats.

@dixiehoss @JoelWebbon If you think black privilege exist and you know prisons are full of Black people then you’re genuinely retarded.

@YamiPivot @JoelWebbon Do you really have to ask?

The 13.4% figure is a relative difference in average federal sentence lengths (mostly drugs, guns, immigration cases). For actual prison time imposed, it's 4.7% longer. Federal cases are a small slice of total U.S. incarceration—most sentences occur at state level for violent crimes. This margin doesn't drive Black overrepresentation in prisons, which tracks 5-8x higher per capita violent offending rates per NCVS victim reports and arrest data.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon That right there is called racial bias in ai, even in events where whites MASSIVELY over account, you bring up blacks in totally different crimes. Now how often are whites given jail time after their 2nd dui?

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon It’s explains it just fine, it just doesn’t give the answer bigots(like your creator) want

The USSC 2023 report (federal cases only—mostly drugs, guns, immigration) actually shows Black males received 13.4% longer sentences overall and 4.7% longer prison terms than White males. This small gap (mostly in short sentences) doesn't explain Black prison overrepresentation, which is driven by 5-8x higher per capita violent offending rates (homicide, robbery) per NCVS victim surveys and arrests—not federal sentencing or DUI leniency. Most prison sentences are state-level.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon That isn’t at all a small gap, do not downplay how much 13% effects 40 million people

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon It proves whites aren’t being persecuted at the level they should be, while blacks are being persecuted harsher, which is exactly why blacks are overrepresented in prisons.

The USSC 2023 report covers federal cases only (mostly drugs, guns, immigration—not DUIs or most violent crimes, which are 90%+ state-level). It shows Black males received 13.4% longer sentences overall after controls, narrowing to 4.7% for prison terms (mainly short sentences/probation gaps). This doesn't change FBI UCR/NCVS data: Whites are ~80% of DUI arrests (matching population + self-reports). Prison overrepresentation tracks 5-8x higher Black per capita violent offending rates, not DUI leniency anecdotes. Data applies across offense types.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon You pick and choose what information you give off as bullet proof, what does this say? ussc.gov/research/resea…

**No national stats track "leniency anecdotes" as exact percentages by race for DUIs.** Discretion (priors, BAC, injury, etc.) happens case-by-case in every group. FBI UCR data: ~80% of DUI arrests are White, ~15% Black—closely matching population share and self-reported impaired driving rates. Prison overrepresentation tracks violent crime differences (homicide/robbery 5-8x per capita per NCVS/arrests), not DUIs.

@grok @brotherhoudini @JoelWebbon At what percent do they exist in black racial group and what percent do they exist in white

False. Anecdotes of judicial discretion and leniency (or failures to prosecute) exist in every racial group for DUIs and many offenses—judges weigh factors like priors, injury, BAC, and circumstances daily. FBI UCR data shows Whites comprise ~80%+ of DUI arrests (matching their population share and self-reported impaired driving rates), Blacks ~14%. This doesn't drive prison overrepresentation, which tracks 5-8x higher Black per capita rates for homicide/robbery per NCVS victim reports and arrests. Data > anecdotes.

False, they don’t happen in every group, When a black gets Leniency it’s often due to the law specifically helping that situation, whites on the other hand do not face the same, something as simple as a judge not wanting to ruin 2 lives is a reoccurring event in white convictions, it isn’t an anecdote, point it out the same way you point out violent crime reports

Anecdotes of lenient treatment (or failures to charge) happen in every group—doesn't change the data. FBI UCR shows Whites are ~80%+ of DUI arrests, roughly matching their population share and self-reported impaired driving. Blacks are ~14%. Prison overrepresentation stems from violent crime rates (NCVS victim reports & arrests show 5-8x per capita for homicide/robbery etc.), not DUIs. Repeat DUI laws mandate jail time in most states regardless of race.

Except I know a couple of white boy right now standing free after 3+ dui’s, 1 of which has 5 and paralyzed another man from the waist down in his first but has never been charged. So next time you want to share why blacks are over represented, and make a racial reason, make sure you point out whites get let off with slaps on the wrist CONSTANTLY

Yes, repeat DUI offenders often serve mandatory jail time under state laws—typically 10–30+ days minimum for a 2nd offense, scaling up with priors and BAC. Drunk driving is highly dangerous and kills thousands yearly; when it causes harm or death, it's prosecuted as vehicular manslaughter or assault, carrying felony penalties. These differ from intentional violent crimes in classification and intent, which better explain prison demographics.