0xYann

1️⃣ The Perp DEX Wars are here. Protocols like Hyperliquid, EdgeX, and Extended are throwing millions in rewards and airdrops to attract liquidity. But manual farming across them all? ⛔️ Expensive, time-consuming, and chaotic. 👇 Enter Mithril Money.

🔨We’ve spent the last weeks turning Mithril from “our bot infra” into an execution OS for onchain trading a layer you can build bots, dashboards, and full agentic systems on without touching exchange integrations. The lightpaper is finally ready! On Thursday 26th we’re publishing how it all fits together: - why perp DEX infra is still the bottleneck - how Mithril’s exchange + execution layer works under the hood - what you’ll be able to build on top in the next few weeks If you want the PDF as soon as it drops, reply “lightpaper” and we’ll DM you the link on launch.

Did you guys read the @Overcast_zk manifesto yet? 👇 overcast.fi/Manifesto.pdf

The bot: executing trades Me: checking points Team effort

Tired of grinding for points? What if your bots did it for you… and you still get the rewards? Farming @AftermathFi on autopilot with @mithril_money 🤖 No stress. No manual trading. Definitely something I’m scaling.

The bot: executing trades Me: checking points Team effort

The next wave of commerce will be run by machines. Not metaphorically. As of March, 2026, AI agents are already negotiating contracts, purchasing compute, routing capital, and executing multi-step commercial workflows — autonomously, around the clock. The projected trajectory is unambiguous: agentic e-commerce is on track to grow from $3.6 billion today to $282 billion by 2034. But here is what nobody building in this space wants to say out loud: the entire thesis breaks without the right settlement infrastructure underneath it. Lesson one: agentic systems require determinism. An AI agent that cannot guarantee execution outcomes - that might pay twice, fail mid-flow, or produce a different result on retry - is not an agent. It is a liability. The same logic applies, without modification, to agentic commerce. Lesson two: agentic commerce requires private settlement. Cards don't work for machines. Card rails were designed for humans operating at human speed, with human-legible friction points: authorization windows, chargeback cycles, 2–3% merchant fees that make micropayments uneconomical. An agent executing thousands of sub-transactions per day against distributed counterparties across jurisdictions cannot operate on Visa infrastructure. The latency alone is disqualifying. The cost structure makes it worse. And the problem compounds further: agentic commerce is by definition chain agnostic. Agents don't care about network boundaries - they operate wherever the counterparty, asset, or service lives. A settlement layer that only functions on a single network forces agents into artificial constraints that defeat the purpose. The infrastructure underneath must be chain-agnostic by design i.e. capable of settling across Ethereum, Solana, and beyond. The answer is programmable settlement on blockchain rails. This is not a controversial position - Mastercard, Visa, PayPal, Cloudflare, and Coinbase are all racing to acknowledge it. The question is what kind of blockchain settlement, and on what terms. Here is where the industry has a blind spot. Public blockchain settlement means public transaction graphs. Every payment, every counterparty, every commercial relationship - readable by any observer. For agents operating on behalf of institutions, merchants, or individuals, this is not a privacy preference. It is a structural disqualifier. A business that exposes its supplier relationships, pricing strategy, and transaction volumes on a public ledger is not using blockchain as infrastructure. It is using it as a liability. Lesson three: privacy without identity is not compliance. It is a dead end. If you want commercial privacy on-chain, you cannot simply encrypt and settle. Regulated commerce requires identity. Counterparties need to know they are dealing with verified entities - not to expose those entities publicly, but to satisfy the compliance requirements that govern cross-border payments, institutional transactions, and increasingly, autonomous agent operations. This means KYC/KYB cannot be bolted on after the fact. It must be programmable, composable, and embedded. The identity attestation must be verifiable without being readable. The compliance proof must travel with the transaction without revealing the underlying data. zkKYC is not a product feature. It is the prerequisite. The stack that makes agentic commerce real. zkKYC establishes verified identity without data exposure. Private settlement wraps assets while preserving compliance hooks. Primitives like private x402 extend this infrastructure into native agentic payment flows: micropayments between agents, compute purchases, streaming settlement - all executing within a compliance boundary, all opaque to external observers. This is the stack. Not a nice-to-have. Not a differentiating feature for the privacy-conscious. The necessary condition for agentic systems & commerce to operate at institutional scale, cross-border, and under regulatory scrutiny. Overcast is that infrastructure. The hype around agentic commerce is justified. Existing privacy protocols address parts of the problem - privacy or interoperability or compliance but none close the loop on all three simultaneously at production scale. We are building the layer that does. zkKYC → Private Interchain Settlement → Programmable Commerce Primitives. In that order. For that reason.

@mithril_money Have a good AMA! It will be a replay for me. @Absoluto92 @Ajayconsult_001

🚨 Alpha Friday tomorrow at 1pm UTC: youtube.com/watch?v=N3D7nl… This one’s for the builders. We’ll be sharing: • A sneak peek of the Mithril Light Paper • How the Builder Program works The first cohort is already full. Next cohort opens in 1 week → 10 spots available If you’re building in trading / infra / automation, join us tomorrow, you wont regret it!

DeCharge × ReFi Hub 21 EV chargers live and distributing Real-world usage → infrastructure revenue → investor distributions.

Review & learn about the details here: x.com/CoralTribeNFT/…

Most people think farming points requires constant trading. It doesn’t. Set the system once. Let automation handle the rest. While I’m doing something else, the bots keep generating volume and stacking Pacifica points 🌊 @pacifica_fi × @mithril_money 🤖⚒️

The Agentic Funding & Coordination track just got a serious upgrade. ⚡️ @solana is taking over. If you're building the coordination primitives, funding rails, and autonomous agent infra—this is your arena. Mar 14–15 · Frontier Tower · SF luma.com/ftchack-sf-2026

@mithril_money @pacifica_fi @jeftothemoon6 @MrBitey19 An event not to be missed!

⚡ Alpha Friday tomorrow: 1PM UTC youtube.com/live/sUnaBL5Qs… Big week at Mithril 👇 🚀 #2 Largest Builder on @pacifica_fi ⚒️ Infrastructure upgrade completed (bots + DN fully resumed) 🪂 mORE Points claim live for BorgPad × Mithril BULK Vault And we’ll also talk about what we’re working on next… 📜 Mithril Light Paper: first version dropping to OGs soon. See you tomorrow. ⚒️

New listing on ReFi Hub. FLP Solar Plant Series II — an operating solar asset with: - Fixed monthly payment - 35% share of project revenue Monthly USDC distributions start April 20.

We connect capital to operating energy infrastructure. Here's exactly how the cashflow works:

Returns are only as strong as their source. Target annual return: 21.5% Target IRR: 15.9% This investment entitles holders to a share of monthly distributions generated by the solar asset. See the full details on our website.

We are partnering with @arbital_xyz to bring no-code, 24/7 market making with 0% fees to Hibachi. Market making should be accessible to everyone, and Arbital is building the tech to make that a reality. Arbachio

Welcome @EclipticaOS to the Hibachi family. AI-driven market analysis, robust position monitoring, and fast execution on Hibachi all in a single venue. Check it out, the UX is top tier! x.com/EclipticaOS/st…