Z99_pass_thru

15 posts

Z99_pass_thru

Z99_pass_thru

@Z99PassThru

Katılım Mayıs 2024
86 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@guan0804 @dearemon 难道瑞士不算欧洲吗?你这德国这种收入还不如国内一线大城市的少说话,闭嘴,落后国家要闭嘴
中文
1
0
0
53
Nancy
Nancy@guan0804·
@dearemon 这编排的是欧洲哪个国家,白俄罗斯吗😂我在德国看病也不花钱啊,不都走医保吗。你要是编个兽医贵我还能信一信。
中文
6
0
17
835
禿道道🐟
禿道道🐟@dearemon·
发达国家到底发达在哪?这样的发达有何意义? 工资是两倍三倍,日常消费看病也翻两三倍那这样发达有何意义⋯
禿道道🐟 tweet media
中文
63
0
45
17K
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@systematicls Glad I unsubscribed from your stupid $99 monthly substack 各位中国量化同仁,看到这里,别订这个傻逼的付费内容。这傻逼竟然公开歧视华人
中文
0
0
2
533
sysls
sysls@systematicls·
The problem with the chinese is that they are highly secular. Wherever they go, they will establish a little corner with their own little China. They will have their own rules and opportunities. If you do not speak the language, you are excluded entirely and are an “outsider”.
Jeremy Bernier@jeremybernier

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions. Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place. The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin. Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not. Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese) On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days. One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads. I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard. Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general. When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it. I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this. I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity. I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc. But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

English
15
2
175
40.7K
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@systematicls Total bullshit. Already reported. This is projection. White American provincialism is simply normalized, so people don’t notice it. The same behavior gets called “community” when whites do it and “separatism” when Chinese people do it.
English
1
0
3
911
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@wangjupaian 马兴瑞咋还在?不是被拿下了吗?哪年的旧闻还拿出来
中文
0
1
13
42.4K
王局拍案
王局拍案@wangjupaian·
中共政治局委员名单,按姓氏笔画为序排列,丁薛祥排在习近平前。 网友调侃:丁薛祥我劝你赶快改姓!
王局拍案 tweet media
中文
791
20
1.2K
1.3M
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@wangwatchworld 瑞士不用欧元,用法郎。现在欧美普遍都是这个物价,付不起那你就只能待在泰国马来这样的地方
中文
0
0
4
761
王海滨的财经闲谈
王海滨的财经闲谈@wangwatchworld·
得吐槽一下瑞士的物价,一小瓶依云4欧,一个鸡肉卷10欧。
中文
25
0
30
37K
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@BVB_BaselStadt Warum gibt es bei euch ständig Störungen? Die Schweizer Zeichensetzung ist eine glatte Lüge.
Deutsch
0
0
0
30
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@xumouren_yt 图都是错的,欧盟都不包含瑞士。你先问问为啥瑞士不加入欧盟
中文
0
0
0
156
说真话的徐某人
说真话的徐某人@xumouren_yt·
其实川普之乱,总体而言是利于欧盟的。因为这是世界上唯一一块,有足够实力、且坚持开放、多元、包容和普世价值的地方。在混乱的黑暗森林中,这些品质会变得愈发宝贵。 而且最卡BUG的地方在于,它可以不通过战争扩张领土、它甚至可以给入盟者强加一个价值观准则。 卡BUG实在太卡BUG了……
说真话的徐某人 tweet media
中文
146
11
251
63.8K
记者易速利2026
记者易速利2026@yisuli2026·
大兵净多这段批评值得大家看一看,管理美国之音的 @karilake 尤其需要,此例正好可以印证她认为的这个机构已经腐烂到根上。中美对标镜头前的妖妖酱是背稿念稿,背后策划是陈为军。其他自媒体都是脑跟脸长在同一个人身上,但他们一个有脸无脑,一个有脑无脸,所以只能以共生关系行走于社交媒体平台。
中文
22
6
147
30.8K
沈彤
沈彤@jessyshen·
情况不对 这一周是关键 小心台海!
中文
29
1
48
35.8K
Z99_pass_thru
Z99_pass_thru@Z99PassThru·
@christinaqi What are their incentives in doing this? Just want firms to waste more time in hiring?
English
0
0
1
3.6K
Christina Qi
Christina Qi@christinaqi·
RESUME FRAUD ALERT: Grab your popcorn cuz this is wild. 🍿 We noticed a new type of resume fraud, with the following patterns: 1. Overly generic Western + Asian name combo (Kevin Chen, Robert Lee, etc) that's impossible to look up . 2. Graduation year ~2013 on average. 3. School is either: Uncommon tier 1 (Caltech, Tsinghua, etc.), or some school in Texas (Houston, Arlington, Dallas, Austin). No GPA. No courses or activities. 4. Multiple stints in brand name >$1B startups (Clickhouse, Clickup, Block, Stripe, Twilio etc.) and large tech firms (Meta, Google, etc). 5. Non-working LinkedIn URL if included. 6. Too much diversity in technology (resume claims to have everything from devops, to backend, frontend, API, CI/CD, AWS, etc. in too many languages). Word salad. 7. Very similar formatting that doesn't follow a common convention (e.g. LaTeX). If I had endless time on my hands, I'd video-interview one of them just to suss out more info about their operation (blink twice if you need help). This would be fun for an investigative journalist to pursue.
Christina Qi tweet mediaChristina Qi tweet mediaChristina Qi tweet mediaChristina Qi tweet media
English
7
2
28
6.6K
美国大兵净多
美国大兵净多@DaBingJingDuo·
@kingluffywang 在以色列和美国的支持下被违反?原来10月7日,是美国和以色列策划的。这个hasan真是哈马斯亲儿子,下届纽约市长非他莫属了。
中文
3
0
8
2.1K
北美王路飞
北美王路飞@kingluffywang·
一方面,即便这笔“交易”达成,特朗普也不配获得诺贝尔和平奖,因为我们已经见过这些协议、停火,它们来了又去——并且在以色列及美国支持下被违反。能坚持住吗? 另一方面,基辛格都拿过诺贝尔奖了,那不如也给特朗普一个。
北美王路飞 tweet media
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan

On the one hand, Trump doesn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize even if this 'deal' happens, as we've seen these deals, ceasefires, come & go - & be violated by Israel with US support. Will it hold? On the other hand, Kissinger got an effing Nobel so might as well give one to Trump.

中文
4
0
8
8.5K
初码
初码@chumacn·
对了,想起来一个事,可以说道说道,关于李汀的,之前我说过,一个人的意志力都无法战胜的东西,那就是客观规律,那么关于李汀的客观规律是啥呢?那就是她本人的懒惰,她过去40年的生命轨迹中,特别是成年后,看不到勤奋、坚持和自律,只看到懒惰、捷径和投机,所以不管她嘴上讲的多么动听,多么感人,多么颠倒是非黑白,不管她有多少脑子进水又或是没有社会阅历的圣心拥趸,这些统统没用,在客观规律面前,都是个屁,那么好了,我到底想说个啥呢,我想说,她开销很大,没有财务规划,做事无规律,所以呢,但凡她有什么动作,比如说要起诉,比如说突然更新视频,比如说突然搞事情,背后的背后,都只有1个原因,那就是,钱快花完了!世间万物,管你怎么变化,正所谓奥卡姆剃刀总会给你剃的干干净净,关于李汀的第一性原理,就是她用了10多年,向大家证明了她是一个眼高手低、做事没规划、有粉丝也赚不到钱甚至懒得用心赚钱的人,这就是一个事实意义上的废人,以后她所有的人生的所有行为,都一定是以这些基本规律为底层参考的,不需要有任何怀疑,如果怀疑,那就相信时间的力量
中文
42
5
151
46.7K
二大爷
二大爷@tankman2002·
预测失败。向粉丝致歉。人民要选择一个混蛋那也是没办法的事情,这就是民主。乌克兰和台湾都自求多福吧。只能恭喜普京和习近平又多了一个好朋友。
中文
1.2K
55
2.1K
974.9K