Zach Parolin

2.3K posts

Zach Parolin banner
Zach Parolin

Zach Parolin

@ZParolin

Professor of Social Policy, Inequality, and Opportunity at University of Oxford. Director, Inequality Programme at INET Oxford. Fellow at Nuffield College.

Oxford, UK Katılım Şubat 2009
1K Takip Edilen3.6K Takipçiler
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
@_cingraham Damn. What a journey. So glad to read the good news after everything you had to through in the meantime.
English
0
0
0
765
Christopher Ingraham🦗
Christopher Ingraham🦗@_cingraham·
For Slate, I wrote about what it's like to get a terminal cancer diagnosis when you're 42.
Christopher Ingraham🦗 tweet media
English
31
76
1.2K
201.6K
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
I'm hiring a post-doctoral researcher to join us at the University of Oxford and our @INETOxford Inequality team. Ideal candidate has experience in the fields of inequality, social mobility, and public policy. We can sponsor visas for non-UK applicants. See link in post below.
English
1
0
2
281
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
@IveMarx 7 years! And what a group. Should have warned the Irish guy on the right to watch out for his job. ;)
English
1
0
1
126
Ive Marx
Ive Marx@IveMarx·
Facebook reminds me of this picture. 7 years from PhD to Oxford professor is not bad ⁦@ZParolin⁩. Not bad at all.
Ive Marx tweet media
English
1
0
9
1.2K
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
Have you picked up your copy of Inherited Inequality yet? You should! Congratulations to @christinajcross on this data-driven, accessible, and profoundly important account of why family structure does not explain the relative disadvantages of Black youth.
Zach Parolin tweet media
English
1
4
7
585
Zach Parolin retweetledi
Florian Scheuer
Florian Scheuer@Florian_Scheuer·
I am delighted to share that Nobel laureates Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee will join our Department of Economics @econ_uzh at the University of Zurich on July 1, 2026, as Lemann Foundation Professors of Economics. 🧵 1/7
Florian Scheuer tweet media
English
80
466
3.5K
1.7M
Zach Parolin retweetledi
INET Oxford
INET Oxford@INETOxford·
FOUR new positions available at INET Oxford! @ZParolin is hiring: 🠺 1x FT Post-Doctoral Researcher in Inequality, Social Policy, and Social Mobility 🠺 3x PT Researchers in Inequality, Social Policy, and Social Mobility Find out more & apply ➵ inet.ox.ac.uk/vacancies
INET Oxford tweet media
English
0
4
6
706
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
3/3 -- For the part-time RA positions -- Great opportunity for PhD/DPhils or advanced masters students studying in the UK and/or from the UK to join our growing research team. See call for more specifics.
English
0
0
2
181
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
2/ Due to conditions of the grant used to hire, candidates should have eligibility to work in the UK (we'll hire without this condition in the future). Desired start date: Jan 2026 or as soon as possible afterward. Great post-doc opp for those currently in need of funding.
English
1
0
2
186
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
Join us at @INETOxford! I'm hiring one post-doctoral researcher and three research assistants in the field of inequality, social policy, and social mobility to join our research team. Deadline: October 24. Read more and apply: inet.ox.ac.uk/vacancies
English
1
3
7
988
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
I'm truly honored to receive the 2025 Kershaw Award. I entered the policy research world almost by accident after a failed run in the Australian Baseball League. Any recognition of my work is a testament to the wonderful mentors & colleagues I've learned from these past 10 years.
APPAM@APPAM_DC

Along with our partner, @mathmaticanow, we are pleased to announce Zachary Parolin as the 2025 David N. Kershaw Award winner. We look forward to recognizing Zach at #2025APPAM. Read more: ow.ly/1tJM50X57Bw

English
1
1
8
837
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
New WP: We study how minimum wage increases affect poverty and food hardship in the U.S from 1981-2019. Different from recent work, we study the Supplemental Poverty Measure + two measures of food hardship, factor in cost-of-living differences, and more. iza.org/publications/d…
Zach Parolin tweet media
English
0
2
7
458
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
@swinshi This is all exaggerating my point. I believe in trade-offs and I'd be concerned if income support reaches a level where we truly are seeing distortive effects on other outcomes, labor market included. I still believe there is inherent value in lifting incomes of the poorest.
English
0
0
1
25
Scott Winship
Scott Winship@swinshi·
@ZParolin So if redistribution had no measurable effect on ANY outcome other than expenditure (including happiness, stress, self-worth, sense of justice, etc.) you’d still support it? Do you have an upper limit on how much redistribution you’d support then? Why not?
English
2
0
0
35
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
Today's @nytdavidbrooks reflection on the BFY cash transfer RCT makes a misleading claim in its opening sentence, but more generally speaks to a broader confusion in recent write-ups of what BFY can vs. cannot tell us about cash transfers & poverty. 🧵nytimes.com/2025/09/05/opi…
English
2
9
42
8.9K
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
@swinshi Clearly that would affect my calculus! If by negative effects you mean that we can detect enough adverse effects to show that the money spent led to worse outcomes. But I don't think a read of BFY or quasi-exp work (ie 2021 CTC) supports that.
English
1
0
1
39
Scott Winship
Scott Winship@swinshi·
@ZParolin And what if there were negative effects of GBI? How would you weigh those against #1?
English
1
0
0
28
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
@swinshi But I fully get that many others condition "success" on #2 and #3, and I think it's worth studying those regardless. My point: when discussing BFY, it's unhelpful to conflate the lack of evidence on #2 and #3 with what we know about #1. It doesn't show that cash can't reduce pov.
English
1
0
1
70
Zach Parolin
Zach Parolin@ZParolin·
@swinshi ... my normative take on cash is not rooted in the necessity of the downstream effects. I see value in reducing immediate pov & hardship, and promoting fams' consumption capabilities. Does it need to lead to reduced stress or more happiness? Great if so, but not essential for #1.
English
2
0
2
93