Zander Perrigan

2.6K posts

Zander Perrigan

Zander Perrigan

@ZPerrigan25692

Katılım Ağustos 2023
250 Takip Edilen38 Takipçiler
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@marki2059 @TristanSnell And once again, the plain meaning of the text isn’t on your side, legislative intent likely isn’t, and common law precedent isn’t on your side. And the court will likely try to determine this based on the INA, which definitely does not agree with your reading
English
0
0
0
3
Mark Iverson
Mark Iverson@marki2059·
Of course there is more to the 14th, but the impetus was that the freed slaves had no standing in the courts BECAUSE they had no citizenship status. how many cases have you read re the 14th, and citizenship? i have read most of the relevant ones. the other clauses only serve to define the jurisdiction of federal citizens that reside in the states because the states are separate sovereign nations with their own constitutions and state citizens. duh
English
2
0
0
9
Tristan Snell
Tristan Snell@TristanSnell·
If SCOTUS ends Birthright Citizenship Then ANYONE’S citizenship can be revoked Then Trump can deport ANYONE — or let them stay but strip them of voting rights HE ALONE will determine who is a citizen and who is not THAT is what’s at stake here — American democracy itself
English
1.5K
2.5K
7K
87.3K
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@marki2059 @TristanSnell I would say I have read a decent amount of cases considering what my current career path is. And if you have read a bunch h you would know that the second part of your statement isn’t completely true. It also banned confederates from serving in office. Same with the debt clause
English
0
0
0
3
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@BillZooka5 @TristanSnell Huh? They talked about birthright citizenship and what it applied to in the congressional debates. If anything wasn’t present in the “founding documents” (not sure what you are talking about) it’s the domicile part
English
0
0
0
23
BillZooka
BillZooka@BillZooka5·
@ZPerrigan25692 @TristanSnell You just made that up because none of that was in the founding documents. Did you even listen to the arguments today?
English
2
0
0
63
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@marki2059 @TristanSnell You don’t understand if if you think that was the sole purpose. Birthright citizenship is just 1 clause in the14th. There is also Due Process, Equal Protection, immunities, public debt, disqualification, and other things
English
1
0
0
13
Mark Iverson
Mark Iverson@marki2059·
We are all distracted by the wrong question... By now, it should be common knowledge that the sole PURPOSE of the 14th amendment was to confer a citizenship STATUS on the freed slaves. Surprise!  There are NO MORE freed slaves to protect! The 14th is OBSOLETE, and no longer needed. We could all be state citizens... that STATUS still exists SEPARATE from US citizenship. END OF DEBATE, PROBLEM SOLVED I’ve written numerous articles with court citations on citizenship. link is on my profile.
English
2
0
1
183
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@Roguendependent @TristanSnell A. The authors intent makes it very clear he intended everyone but foreign diplomats kids to be apart of this. B. They only go to legislative intent after analyzing the plain meaning, and the plain meaning is clear
English
0
0
0
11
C.G. Rogan
C.G. Rogan@Roguendependent·
It's not ending it you mental midget, it is defining what the 14th was intended to do. If you read the authors intention it is much different. They may or may not take the intention into consideration. That is their fucking job. How can you be so dam dumb and have so many followers. Goes to show a lot of stupid people on X!
English
3
0
45
590
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@BillZooka5 @TristanSnell That is not what any of the congressional debates on the amendment said, and the author of the amendment was very clear on the exceptions he intended. So congressional intent isn’t on your side and neither is the plain meaning of the text, so what is the argument based on?
English
1
0
0
84
BillZooka
BillZooka@BillZooka5·
Oh quit fucking gaslighting people No it wouldn’t 14th amendment was never for someone who just comes over here and visits. It was for the newly freed slaves. Democrats are just scared because they know their policies are shit and unpopular so they have to manipulate scheme and cheat to gain power
English
25
6
246
2.4K
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
John Sauer: “8 Billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who is a US citizen.” Chief Justice Roberts: “It’s a new world, but it’s the same Constitution.” Robert’s is saying we have to let the country be invaded and destroyed?
English
240
962
4.4K
149.3K
LynyrdsMom
LynyrdsMom@Lynyrds_Mom·
@PeteHegseth Fvcking activist Judges. This 💩 needs to stop, they're not ruling based on law
English
6
0
29
982
PunishedNixon🚁🇺🇸
PunishedNixon🚁🇺🇸@NixonPunished·
@RepRoKhanna @DAGToddBlanche Oh, so you’re fully aware that it’s Gwendolyn Beck but decided you want to grandstand so people assume it’s some Republican presidential candidate from 2016. You’re a real bastard, Khanna.
English
31
3
48
9.9K
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@hjessy_ Ro Khanna coined the term. Ossoff is an elite political talent, but Ro is the driving force of whatever democratic resurgence is going to happen
English
0
0
0
25
Jessy Han
Jessy Han@hjessy_·
Coining “Epstein class” and sneaking in an attack on George Soros is elite political ball knowledge
Acyn@Acyn

Ossoff: We were told that MAGA was for working-class Americans. But this is a government of, by, and for the ultra-rich. It’s the wealthiest Cabinet ever. This is the Epstein class. They are the elites they pretend to hate. If you’re Steve Bannon, how do you sell any of this? He’s literally closing rural hospitals to cut taxes for George Soros.

English
43
370
8.2K
597.9K
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@Acyn Football is an Olympic sport and the nfl plays games across the world, it’s no longer an American sport and the NFL doesn’t want it to be
English
0
0
0
55
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Steele: I couldn't understand a darn thing he said. It’s a celebration of American football. Down in the other countries, football is soccer. This is ours and I'm frustrated that the NFL and Jay-Z chose to do something so outside of what our demographic with American football wants
English
583
40
313
372.6K
JJ Watt
JJ Watt@JJWatt·
Did I understand a single word of it? I did not. Was it a vibe? It was.
English
4.8K
23.2K
345.5K
6.7M
Zander Perrigan
Zander Perrigan@ZPerrigan25692·
@wareagle197 @greathouse76185 @ChrisCuomo Who do you think committed the fraud in Minnesota? And you 100% are comparing fraud to raping kids if you’re commenting about fraud in a post that has nothing to do with fraud
English
0
0
0
3
Zander Perrigan retweetledi
Covie
Covie@covie_93·
They said charlie kirk was a unifier who respected everyone but his organization is planning a separate Superbowl halftime show because they don't like that the performer at the regular halftime show is a Latino man.
English
163
2.3K
25K
408.6K
Nyla Bruce
Nyla Bruce@nyla1way·
@DemocraticWins It sucked. Seriously. Worst halftime show in history. Democrats ruin everything 🙄
English
20
4
303
5.4K
Democratic Wins Media
Democratic Wins Media@DemocraticWins·
BREAKING: Bad Bunny’s halftime show was the most watched halftime show in Super Bowl history. MAGA is going to have a tough time swallowing that.
English
1.8K
6.1K
57.2K
1.1M

Keşfet

@marki2059 @TristanSnell @BillZooka5 @Roguendependent @WallStreetMav @scNme43 @ChrisCuomo @NixonPunished