Zac Crippen

1.4K posts

Zac Crippen banner
Zac Crippen

Zac Crippen

@ZacCrippen

☦️ Building new things for @hallowapp. Theology, Nat Sec, Tech. IC XC NIKA. Eagles, Phillies, Longhorns.

Katılım Aralık 2009
138 Takip Edilen541 Takipçiler
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
If you're disappointed that the Pope didn't use his encyclical to endorse a materialist/physicalist account of consciousness and intelligence, I don't know what to tell you.
English
5
12
166
4.9K
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
This is a stupid take. I’ve followed Dean for a long time but his response here is a massive swing and a miss.
Dean W. Ball@deanwball

Reading the encyclical, I am reminded that the Vatican is fundamentally a city-state on the continent of Europe, and that its elites, which of course include the Pope himself, cannot resist the myopic preoccupations of the Eurocrat. This document would be much improved if it were less enamored of the traditional academia/civil society talking points on AI (“The apparent objectivity of the responses and suggestions these systems provide can lead us to overlook the fact that they reflect the cultural assumptions of those who designed and trained them” woah! really???) and more engaged with where AI is headed. But instead of doing that, the encyclical dodges in the deepest sense, denying that AI “really thinks” or “really learns” and all that typical strain of cope that amounts to magical thinking: “when a computer does it, it is ‘data processing,’ beep boop, but when a human does it, it is ‘actual learning’” It is probably actively bad for global understanding of AI that the Pope endorsed this viewpoint as late as 2026. In the end, this encyclical reads to me as though ghost written by the blob of Western civil society, the same people whose feckless and incoherent preaching we have heard blanketing our media for decades now. And, in a very important sense, it was written by them; after all, who forms the peer group for the elites of a European city-state? Like that blob, the encyclical is intellectually flaccid at its core, no matter how well intentioned it may be. This document is a missed opportunity to advance global understanding of AI, and yet another blow to the legitimacy and sanctity of storied Western institutions. As if you needed one more.

English
6
1
100
14.3K
🪞
🪞@allldiamonds·
this Pope is the first one of my lifetime that has legitimately convinced me to engage with Catholic literature and their understanding of the world and i'm not Catholic
English
134
720
14.2K
172.6K
Chris Fralic
Chris Fralic@chrisfralic·
I used AI to process the "Magnifica Humanitas" encyclical letter from @Pontifex about AI, turning 37,000 words into a 7 minute video
English
32
65
318
68K
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
To a society that has tried its best to forget, ignore, or supplant God, AI will always promise unimaginable power.
English
0
0
0
100
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
@michael_timbs It's because you reversed the proportions. It's 1 pound of creatine for every 2 grams of body weight.
English
4
3
4.3K
113K
Michael Timbs
Michael Timbs@michael_timbs·
Been trying the whole “2g of creatine for every 1 lb of body weight” thing for a month now and I’ve never felt worse. How do you guys do it. It’s also like $1000 a week of creatine.
English
494
105
18.2K
2.9M
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
@matheus_bazzo_ *speed reads one paragraph of the encyclical* “Wow, bad take from the Pope, ama”
English
0
0
2
20
Matheus Bazzo
Matheus Bazzo@matheus_bazzo_·
It’s a 42,000 word Encyclical. How do we already have such well formulated opinions all around social media? The AI mindset is so impregnated that people think they can verbiage any output without proper meditation. It’s too much to ask for at least a day of thought processing?
English
20
31
313
12.4K
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
@deanwball I would be curious what you think the “fundamental misunderstanding of the reality of AI” is.
English
1
0
7
480
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
You have overinterpreted my claims on a wide variety of dimensions, the cardinal sin of the twitter hater. 1. The regulatory concerns mentioned throughout strongly mirror European talking points, sometimes down to precise phraseology. The centrality of Jesus Christ to the encyclical does not change this. 2. Of course there is a distinction between LLM cognition and human cognition, but the encyclical doesn’t make that claim. Instead it claims that LLMs have no cognition at all, and that it is just “data processing,” “mimicking,” etc. You also inserted a view about consciousness in your reply that is nowhere to be found in my original critique. 3. I am not calling all of CST “intellectually flaccid,” and no reasonable person would interpret my tweet that way. I am calling the encyclical intellectually flaccid, which it is. 4. People look to the Church for guidance, and a guide must understand what he is speaking about. The encyclical is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of the reality of AI, and thus it will actively mislead many followers of the Church. I think that’s a shame.
English
3
0
12
882
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
@deanwball Twitter hater? Come on, Dean. I already said I’ve followed you for a long time. I’ve learned a lot from you!
English
1
0
1
232
Zac Crippen
Zac Crippen@ZacCrippen·
Sure. 1. "The myopic preoccupations of the Eurocrat" is a ridiculous way to describe the focus of the encyclical. Find me a single Eurocrat who in the last 50 years has pointed to the Incarnation of Jesus Christ as the key to understanding all of human history and progress. 2. "[The encyclical] dodges in the deepest sense, denying that AI 'really thinks' or 'really learns' and all that typical strain of cope that amounts to magical thinking." Surely your contention here isn't that there is not a meaningful distinction in kind between the thinking done by a conscious human being and the pattern matching done by an LLM? Come on. AIs will never be consciousness, and that's not "cope," it's a metaphysically well-grounded claim. 3. "Intellectually flaccid at its core" is an ignorant (some might say disrespectful) way to paint the entire Catholic philosophical tradition of the *imago Dei* and Catholic Social Teaching. 4. "A missed opportunity to advance global understanding of AI" -- sure, but in the same way Huxley's "Brave New World" is a missed opportunity to advance global understanding of in vitro fertilization. Advancing global awareness of the technology is explicitly not what the document sets out do to. When has a papal encyclical ever served to advance a global understanding of a technology? You write as if you expected Pope Leo XIV to announce that he's joining Anthropic's technical staff.
English
1
3
46
1.2K
Zac Crippen retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together. In Jesus Christ, this humanity in its grandeur becomes the Way, the Truth and the Life, opening the path for each of us to grow toward fullness. #MagnificaHumanitas vatican.va/content/leo-xi…
English
1K
19K
117.8K
11.6M
Zac Crippen retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
Let us learn to be rich in a different way: more attentive to relationships, more intent on valuing the common good, more attached to the local area, more grateful in welcoming and integrating those who come to live with us.
English
1.3K
5.5K
27.5K
731.8K
Zac Crippen retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
As evidenced by the unbridled promotion and implementation of technology at the expense of human dignity, we are truly experiencing an eclipse of the sense of what it means to be human. It is imperative to recover an understanding of the true meaning and grandeur of humanity as intended by God. It is in this sense that the challenge we currently face is not technological, but anthropological, and it is my hope that the Encyclical Letter to be published within a few days will contribute to answering this challenge.
English
1.1K
4.9K
26.2K
1.3M
Zac Crippen retweetledi
Josh Hochschild
Josh Hochschild@JoshHochschild·
When I see AI from a student, I stop reading, and comment: “I suspect AI. If I’m right, don’t waste my time again. If I’m wrong, come discuss these ideas with me.” (They almost never come) When I see it from an adult professional, I don’t comment but I do stop reading.
eigenrobot@eigenrobot

asking people to read ai-generated text is offensive. this is not because ai text is intrinsically bad. rather, the author has not paid a cost to write the text himself. this cost is a credible signal he finds its communication important. so: not paying that cost is telling

English
38
201
2.4K
120.3K